Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

GI Joe Retaliation..


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 of 37 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,262 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted May 23 2012 - 04:03 PM

Just moved from it's June 29 date this summer to.. NEXT MARCH


 


http://www.deadline....ign-box-office/


 


 


Quote:


EXCLUSIVE: The sequel G.I. Joe: Retaliation was supposed to come out this summer on June 29th. But I’ve learned that Paramount is moving the movie nine months to March 29, 2013, to add 3D. “We’re going to do a conscientious 3D job because we’ve seen how it can better box office internationally,” one of the studio execs just told me. “Jim Cameron did all of Titanic‘s 3D in post — and look how well that movie turned out.” Hollywood is shocked that Paramount vacated the primo date, especially because Paramount blew a wad on a Super Bowl commercial and already was starting TV and outdoor ads for GI Joe 2.

 


They can say whatever they want, but they just spent a ton of marketing, and to move it back 9 months now.. something tells me the test screenings must be HORRIBLE to vacate one of the biggest box office weekends (before 4th of July) to move to.. early spring 9 months later.. it's like flushing all that advertising money down the toilet.. wow.
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#2 of 37 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,986 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted May 23 2012 - 04:33 PM

That was my first thought as well: Retaliation must stink to high heaven and Paramount knows it.  I don't buy the 3D reason, to be honest.  There could be a ton of reasons for the movie:   1) Movie is terrible 2) 3D IS the real reason 3) Too much Channing Tatum this year (21 Jump Street, The Vow, Magic Mike, Retaliation) 4) Battleship is doing terribly domestically vs. Avengers   Because, here's the thing: Paramount is going to have a TON of high profile product next year.  This movie, Star Trek 2, Anchorman 2, World War Z, the new TMNT movie...and they prolly (maybe...kinda...I forget how this works) have their hands on Thor 2 in some way.   Retaliation is now going to have to deal with the bad publicity from the long delay, the remake of Carrie, Oz, Percy Jackson 2 and Jack the Giant Killer (Bryan Singer) all in March.   Yes, the delay for Star Trek "worked" (I still contend it would have made more money at Christmas than in the summer).  I just have a bad feeling about this.

#3 of 37 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer



  • 11,843 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationVermont

Posted May 23 2012 - 05:39 PM

Yes, the 3D story must just be a smokescreen. There must be a different reason, as the decision on 3D would have been made long before now, before all the marketing was underway and millions of dollars had been spent that will now be wasted and have to be spent again to re-promote the film next year. I saw a trailer for this before Battleship. I thought it looked better than the first film (though that may not be saying much).
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#4 of 37 OFFLINE   dmiller68

dmiller68

    Supporting Actor



  • 667 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2009

Posted May 23 2012 - 05:42 PM

Crazy I thought this may have had a better chance then the first one.
Equipment: Panasonic TC-P65VT25, Panasonic DMP-BDT100, Pioneer Elite SC-37, TiVo Premiere XL, Limited Edition MW3 XBOX 360s with Kinect, Apple TV
Speakers: Definitive Technology Mythos XTR60 (3), Definitive Technology Mythos XTR20BP (4), Definitive Technology SuperCube II


#5 of 37 OFFLINE   Zack Gibbs

Zack Gibbs

    Screenwriter



  • 1,687 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 2005

Posted May 23 2012 - 05:46 PM

I think the movie just didn't have a chance in hell this summer. It's a C level action 'franchise.' It has far more potential in an early spring slot than wedged between Pixar and Spider-Man. It was a mistake to ever put it in that spot in the first place. (moved there when Star Trek got pushed to next year, I think it was originally scheduled for August?)
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

#6 of 37 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,237 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted May 24 2012 - 04:15 AM

It's pretty obvious that there's a problem if they're pulling a movie this close to the release but I think I'm more interested in why they chose late March as its new date. I can only hope that Paramount hasn't deluded themselves into thinking that the success of The Hunger Games had anything to do with its release date and that late March is some heretofore undiscovered magic time for movie releases.

#7 of 37 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,986 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted May 24 2012 - 07:01 AM

If Paramount is scared of The Avengers, they shouldn't be.  The Avengers should be gone by the end of June (DVD release is just three months after that).  Aside from The Dark Knight Rises, there isn't another summer juggernaut out there.  Spider-Man is going to do well, but I don't think it's going to set records.   Paramount is scared they have a huge bomb on their hands and Retaliation is going to be the butt of so many jokes, especially with other, hopefully high quality films around it-Avengers, Dark Knight Rises, Brave, Prometheus.  
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR /t/320940/gi-joe-retaliation#post_3928926 It's pretty obvious that there's a problem if they're pulling a movie this close to the release but I think I'm more interested in why they chose late March as its new date. I can only hope that Paramount hasn't deluded themselves into thinking that the success of The Hunger Games had anything to do with its release date and that late March is some heretofore undiscovered magic time for movie releases.
  They'd do well to remember what happened to Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance or John Carter this year.  They had largely non-competitive weekends to themselves and couldn't make a dent in the BO.  Why?  Quality, not 3D.

#8 of 37 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,262 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted May 24 2012 - 07:41 AM

I have to tell you though moving "Ted" up to that weekend - a move by Universal is brilliant counter programming; a Hard-R Seth McFarland comedy might find some traction there on a weekend it didn't have a shot at before
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#9 of 37 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,237 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted May 24 2012 - 08:44 AM

In all fairness, Paramount might be making the right call with this delay. If the movie was that bad, I think they'd either just let it come out as scheduled or move it to August and just hope that The Rock's fanbase is enough to move some tickets. Since they're moving the date so far, maybe they think the movie can be salvaged with some reshoots or editing, etc. I've seen plenty of big budget movies where the release date dictated everything and more time might have been asset for the filmmakers. I can't say that I'm that optimistic or even care about G.I. Joe 2 but I'd rather see them delay it months than churn out anything just to hit June 29.

#10 of 37 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer



  • 11,843 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationVermont

Posted May 24 2012 - 09:12 AM

They'd do well to remember what happened to Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance or John Carter this year.  They had largely non-competitive weekends to themselves and couldn't make a dent in the BO.  Why?  Quality, not 3D.
Exactly. Release date is irrelevant if you have a film people want to see. If you have a stinker, you can bomb on any date.
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#11 of 37 OFFLINE   Zack Gibbs

Zack Gibbs

    Screenwriter



  • 1,687 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 2005

Posted May 24 2012 - 11:10 AM

Release date is irrelevant? Bull. I don't know what's going to open the week after March 29... but it sure as hell won't be a Spider-Man movie. That's going to hurt your Box Office whether you're G.I. Joe or the next Batman flick. It looks like a major reworking is going to take place because apparently... [SPOILER=Warning: Spoiler!]Channing Tatum, who's found some recent success, had his character killed of in the first 10 minutes of Joe 2. They're making changes not only to add more of him, but most likely he'll no longer be dead either. [/SPOILER]
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

#12 of 37 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,986 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted May 24 2012 - 04:21 PM

Here's another, non-spoilery reason.  Kinda.


 


Which then leads to my question, if the quote from Jon Chu is accurate: why didn't Paramount go for 3D in the first place?  Cost?  That doesn't seem right since whatever extra money they're going to make is being negated by all the money they already spent in advertising plus what they will need to spend again next year to re-advertise.


 


Something else just occurred to me.  We know Paramount has a lot of product coming next year.  I'm gonna guess one of those other films is going to get bumped shortly. 

#13 of 37 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor



  • 7,249 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted May 24 2012 - 06:17 PM

SHUTTER ISLAND was a pretty good movie. I remember when this was pushed back people went crazy asking if it was because Scorsese had finally screwed up. Now, I'm not saying this film is Scorsese quality but if they pushed it back because it's bad then they'll certainly have to do some reshoots, won't they? If there aren't any reshoots and the only difference in the March version is the 3D then perhaps they really did think the summer was too busy. However, the biggest thing, to me at least, is the fact that overseas markets are now calling the shots on these movies. I can't remember if it was Entertainment Weekly or Rolling Stone who had the article but it's clear that America isn't the big dog on the street and that studios are going to start pushing what other places want. If China wants 3D then I understand the delay here.

#14 of 37 OFFLINE   darkrage

darkrage

    Auditioning



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: May 25 2012

Posted May 25 2012 - 05:36 PM

Sign this petition and let Paramount know we won't put up with this garbage!

#15 of 37 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,262 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted May 25 2012 - 06:53 PM

Sign this petition and let Paramount know we won't put up with this garbage!
Which part is the garbage? Delaying or green lighting the script to begin with?
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#16 of 37 OFFLINE   David9Hester

David9Hester

    Extra



  • 18 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 20 2012

Posted May 27 2012 - 08:38 AM

The director of GI JOE is not bad. He just shouldn't have tried to make GI JOE so...serious. I am guessing someone at Paramount should be fired for deciding to make another sequel.

#17 of 37 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,262 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted May 29 2012 - 09:20 PM

Major script changes and reshoots appear to be ahead:   http://www.deadline....e-2s-big-delay/
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#18 of 37 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,237 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted May 30 2012 - 04:05 AM

I've basically said it before but given the circumstances, this is a GREAT thing that everyone should be applauding. They looked at their crappy movie and instead of saying "Oh well, we gotta make the release date", they've chosen to try to fix it. The costs associated with that must be tremendous (millions to be spent on reshoots, millions wasted on an ad campaign that's going to need to restarted in 8 months and a toy line that Hasbro had to be counting on as their biggest earner of the summer no longer has a movie backing it and will probably result in a large negative effect on their financial year) so while the release date change probably shows how bad the movie was, I give Paramount credit for trying to get it right or better.

#19 of 37 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer



  • 11,843 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationVermont

Posted May 30 2012 - 05:34 AM

Well, it seemed obvious that it had to be more than a 3D conversion as they first tried to claim. That's not a decision you would leave undecided until 4 weeks before release date when your marketing efforts are all underway. That's a decision you make in pre-production.
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#20 of 37 OFFLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer



  • 15,072 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted May 30 2012 - 11:46 AM

Don't underestimate the power of 3D in foreign markets. It's what saved two other big budget stinkers, "John Carter" and "Battleship", from financial oblivion.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users