Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

PILLOW TALK - Way to go, Universal!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 of 16 OFFLINE   Chuck Pennington

Chuck Pennington

    Supporting Actor



  • 861 posts
  • Join Date: May 11 2001

Posted May 01 2012 - 12:28 PM

I first saw PILLOW TALK cropped and scanned on AMC back in 1992 when I was in 7th grade. I loved it. I went on to get the widescreen Laserdisc, which was a revelation at the time. I've had at least 3 different DVD releases, each (save for the cropped and misframed one) an improvement over the last. And now the Blu-ray. I paid $29.99 for it at Best Buy today, more than I've paid for a Blu-ray outside of Twilight Time titles. I was curious about just what kind of work had been done on it as it has a lot of opticals and split-frame scenes that have always appeared terribly dirty and grimy. If every Blu-ray release of a vintage film got the kind of attention that PILLOW TALK received, then there would be cause for celebration. PILLOW TALK on Blu-ray is incredibly colorful and far sharper than I ever thought it would be, even the Doris Day close-up filtered shots. Contrast is strong but whites never bloom, and there is a stability to the image that one could easily take for granted if one had never seen the film before on any of its previous video releases. The optical shots have been degrained and cleaned to a degree, and it is a welcome change. Sometimes the switch to a shot where and optical is going to appear is close to seamless, and even when it isn't, those transitions are wonderfully smooth. The entire film has a light dusting of grain, be it natural or not, but it isn't in the least bit distracting. The sound is remarkably clean and strong as well, be it mono or not. Voices are crisp and clear, and there are sound effects and other subtle sounds that have never sounded so clear to me. No muffling or noise on this track at all. I don't think much of the bonus featurette and commentary track carted over from a prior DVD release, and the trailer is still the mucky standard definition one that we have seen before. I don't really like these book-style releases, as they show up ever fingerprint the moment they are opened. And with all the touting of "digital copy" as a bonus feature, is that "digital copy" ever in HD? Not in my experience, though I can't understand why. Anyway, I just wanted to let you guys know that I thought PILLOW TALK was the real deal on Blu-ray. I can't wait to show it to my boyfriend this weekend - he's never seen or heard of it. http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/ http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/

#2 of 16 OFFLINE   JoHud

JoHud

    Screenwriter



  • 2,728 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 11 2007
  • Real Name:Joe Hudak

Posted May 01 2012 - 12:39 PM

Sounds great! The only qualm I have had from a 2012 Universal release were the "cleaned up" opticals in To Kill A Mockingbird. Those were more of a distraction than an improvement. I hope the opticals shots in this film are handled with more care.

#3 of 16 ONLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter



  • 2,372 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted May 01 2012 - 01:04 PM

I'm dying to get this, but I'm waiting for a better price. Perhaps they'll do a disc-only release later on.

#4 of 16 OFFLINE   moviepas

moviepas

    Second Unit



  • 442 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 13 2011

Posted May 01 2012 - 01:18 PM

My copy of Pillow Talk in Blu was shipped from USA this week but I have seen footage on some Universal featurettes on a disc I got a couple of days ago in the post.


I guess they will do Lover Come Back which I sort of liked better as a film, all the more because I had won tickets on the radio for the family when the film was new and I was still a kid. We went to what we called an Intermediate session then being late afternoon in this ornate late 1920s movie-house downtown that was made later into a twin. It had a ceiling that was of a star-studded night scene and there were statues all over the place. The twin console Wurlitzer Pipe organ was probably still there but is now about 11 miles away in a hall near my home but never heard it there. The film was rather bright and happy considering the dismal weather outside that night and we came into the city via a train service. Never get a car space in a fit then as now.

With this film was a Universal short subject that must have been a 2-reeler as a travelogue made in Tokyo. The showed the people getting kicked into the overcrowded peak time trains, some sumo wrestler stripping off on the way home and doing his thing on a vacant block and scenes in a night club. A patron of the nightclub was obviously American in what we call a suit coat and on the pocket he had a Warner Bros emblem. Never heard of or seen this film since. Any clues???


By the way, the featurettes I watched last night on the Blu Ray Buck Privates(1941) list many titles they say are coming restored on Blu Ray/DVD soon. The titles were too quick to note fully and I was by this time too tired to pause and note them down.



#5 of 16 OFFLINE   Chuck Pennington

Chuck Pennington

    Supporting Actor



  • 861 posts
  • Join Date: May 11 2001

Posted May 01 2012 - 02:57 PM

Sounds great! The only qualm I have had from a 2012 Universal release were the "cleaned up" opticals in To Kill A Mockingbird. Those were more of a distraction than an improvement. I hope the opticals shots in this film are handled with more care.

The restoration featurette included with PILLOW TALK actually addresses that issue pretty well.

#6 of 16 OFFLINE   Will Krupp

Will Krupp

    Screenwriter



  • 1,122 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 02 2003

Posted May 01 2012 - 03:35 PM

Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington 


The restoration featurette included with PILLOW TALK actually addresses that issue pretty well.


Thanks for the great link Chuck!  Mmmmmmm but PILLOW TALK looks good enough to eat with a spoon!  Thanks for the great caps as well.  You've just moved it into my "gotta have it" pile (damn you!)


Watching that featurette though, I admit to having concerns.  Obviously, I'm all for restoration but some of what they're doing is bordering on downright revisionism.  Stabilizing the natural camera weave of Meryl Streep and Robert Redford walking in Out of Africa?  Yikes, it looks as though someone is more concerned with showing off their fancy new software than anything else.  I applaud their overall efforts but sometimes people can get "overzealous" in fixing problems that aren't really problems (I fee the same way about "fixing" the increased grain in the optical zooms in MOCKINGBIRD) to begin with but, oh well.  You take the good, you take the bad.....


Thanks again Chuck (my wallet is angry with you though) Posted Image



#7 of 16 ONLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter



  • 2,372 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted May 01 2012 - 03:49 PM

I agree with you, Will. The camera weave in Out of Africa was part of the original presentation even if it may have been a failure of the cameraman to hold the shot steady, and the optical zooming on To Kill a Mockingbird would always have enlarged the grain, so yeah that's revisionism. Even with the flicker in some of the old movies that was due to faulty shutters, they are fixing something that was always part of the original presentation. I guess it's a fine line because it's all stuff that the original filmmakers would have fixed if they had had the ability to do so, but still... But using digital tools to eliminate scratches, tears, dirt, hiss and bring back color is all terrific!

Watching that featurette though, I admit to having concerns.  Obviously, I'm all for restoration but some of what they're doing is bordering on downright revisionism.  Stabilizing the natural camera weave of Meryl Streep and Robert Redford walking in Out of Africa?  Yikes, it looks as though someone is more concerned with showing off their fancy new software than anything else.  I applaud their overall efforts but sometimes people can get "overzealous" in fixing problems that aren't really problems (I fee the same way about "fixing" the increased grain in the optical zooms in MOCKINGBIRD) to begin with but, oh well.  You take the good, you take the bad.....



#8 of 16 OFFLINE   haineshisway

haineshisway

    Screenwriter



  • 2,373 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2011
  • Real Name:Bruce
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted May 01 2012 - 05:23 PM

Sounds great! The only qualm I have had from a 2012 Universal release were the "cleaned up" opticals in To Kill A Mockingbird. Those were more of a distraction than an improvement. I hope the opticals shots in this film are handled with more care.

Those opticals are very different than the Pillow Talk opticals - the To Kill a Mockingbird are BLOW UPS/opticals and no they shouldn't have really done anything to them because they were never going to look good no matter what and leaving them be would have been the best approach. Pillow Talk's opticals are opticals not blow ups and making them more of a piece with what's before and after them seems fine - they would have done it back then had they been able - and although I don't judge anything from screen caps, the opticals above look very sharp and so whatever they've done has not lost the detail.

#9 of 16 OFFLINE   JoHud

JoHud

    Screenwriter



  • 2,728 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 11 2007
  • Real Name:Joe Hudak

Posted May 01 2012 - 05:34 PM

Oh, gotcha. Having not seen the film, I assumed optical shots referred to in the title post were blow-up opticals. Thank you for the clarification. I happily rescind my previous reservation.

#10 of 16 OFFLINE   haineshisway

haineshisway

    Screenwriter



  • 2,373 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2011
  • Real Name:Bruce
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted May 01 2012 - 06:56 PM

I'm hoping to have it tomorrow and I'll report back. Very excited.

#11 of 16 ONLINE   JohnMor

JohnMor

    Producer



  • 3,471 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2004
  • Real Name:John Moreland
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted May 01 2012 - 07:28 PM

Just finished watching.  Wonderful blu ray, visually and aurally.  The extras are what they are, but Universal did a GREAT job on the feature.  Can't wait for the Uni Monster sets later this year.



#12 of 16 OFFLINE   Billy Batson

Billy Batson

    Screenwriter



  • 1,502 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 19 2008
  • Real Name:Alan
  • LocationLondon

Posted May 01 2012 - 10:58 PM

Great movie, TV used to have a lot of fun with the split-screen when they panned & scanned it!

#13 of 16 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer



  • 11,630 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted May 02 2012 - 12:20 AM

I'm looking forward to it, too, when I can find it for a better price. It was always my favorite of Doris' sex comedies not only for the bright writing but also due to the legendary Thelma Ritter. Even though many like Lover Come Back more (and it was the bigger hit at the box-office), Pillow Talk remains my favorite. It was also the first movie I ever saw at a drive-in.



#14 of 16 ONLINE   Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Extremely Talented Member



  • 4,270 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted May 02 2012 - 12:27 AM

Yes, one of many such films I was taken to drive-ins for with the family.  A quintessential example.  Really looking forward to it.



#15 of 16 OFFLINE   moovtune

moovtune

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 123 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 2010
  • Real Name:James
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted May 02 2012 - 02:48 AM

I hesitate in spending $30.00 for a Blu-Ray title also and would never spend that for a recently made film - especially if I'm paying for a DVD copy and a digital copy as well, that I'll never use and don't want. But at the same time, in a title like this we want the studio to spend the time and expense to restore these classics back to their original glory - but don't want to pay any extra to help them pay for it?



#16 of 16 ONLINE   JohnMor

JohnMor

    Producer



  • 3,471 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2004
  • Real Name:John Moreland
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted May 02 2012 - 04:51 AM

According to the flyer in my Pillow Talk set, all these digi-books, blu-ray & dvd combos are for a limited time only, which I wasn't aware of.  So I'm sure there will be single disc blus of the titles before too long.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users