What's new

A Few Words About A few words about...™ The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011) -- in Blu-ray (1 Viewer)

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,393
Real Name
Robert Harris
There's nothing quite like a foreign hit with tremendous domestic potential for a U.S. re-make to bring out funding and talent, and TGwtDT is a perfect example.

Budgeted at just below 100 million dollars, and with a worldwide gross currently at over 230 million, the film portends to be a financial winner once receipts from home video begin to roll in.

One would presume that the new Blu-ray from Columbia / Sony would be a perfect match to the theatrical, and that presumption would be correct. Needle sharp, when necessary, with shadow detail and color also dead on, this is a gorgeous Blu-ray.

But it should be. Data in. Data out.

Shot on Red -- both Epic and Red One -- at over 4k resolution, and taken to a DI, also at 4k, http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y5H5HY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=afewwordsabout-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003Y5H5HYhttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=afewwordsabout-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B003Y5H5HY
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
42,469
Location
The basement of the FBI building
As with all of David Fincher's special editions, the extras are top notch. For my money, Fincher is the best filmmaker since the heyday of the great directors of the 1970's and having tons of footage of him working and talking about his work is going to be fascinating for film buffs in the coming decades (imagine if this much footage of Hitchcock or Kubrick at work existed).
 

theonemacduff

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
425
Location
the wet coast
Real Name
Jon Paul
Absolutely agree with TravisR. One of the joys of the Panic Room DVD set was not so much the film (which is okay, but not, shall we say, for the ages), as it was the massive supplementary package, which told you everything you needed to know about how the film was made, including fascinating sidebars on such things as using Super 35 to best advantage, and the implications of using a two perf system as opposed to (I think) a three perf. As to that, Fincher noted that producers, of course, wanted him to use the two perf, because it was cheaper and you can hear the scorn for that decision in his voice as he says the words. I love Fincher's films (except maybe The Game, which I have only seen once, and which I thought had plot-hole problems; but maybe I should see it again), and absolutely love hearing him talking about his work.
 

SeanAx

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
158
Location
Seattle, WA
Real Name
Sean Axmaker
Allow me to chime in to agree with all that has been said above. David Fincher Blu-ray releases are perhaps the only discs that justify a purchase on the quality of the supplements ALONE. All of the discs over which Fincher has exerted creative control over the supplements provide thoughtful, in depth, articulate documentaries, featurettes, interviews and commentary tracks that tell more about the process of making a film, from both the creative and the practical (technical) aspects, than almost any other disc out there. (Peter Jackson's releases are in the same category.)
 

JParker

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
309
Real Name
James Parker
One would presume that the new Blu-ray from Columbia / Sony would be a perfect match to the theatrical, and that presumption would be correct. Needle sharp, when necessary, with shadow detail and color also dead on, this is a gorgeous Blu-ray.
But it should be. Data in. Data out.
Shot on Red -- both Epic and Red One -- at over 4k resolution, and taken to a DI, also at 4k, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo goes a huge step further in David Fincher's use of digital technology, and a long way from the textural look of his 2007 Zodiac, which was shot at 1920 x 1080. I recall viewing that film, and being not totally impressed by the digital work.
Only four years later, and with both Benjamin Button and Social Network added to his technical scorecard, and with Jeff Cronenweth, who also shot Social Network at the visual helm, this is a film that takes the latest innovations in digital technology, and uses everything available to best advantage.
If anyone has any concerns regarding the ability of digital cinematography to properly tell a story and capture the world as desires, this is a film that proves the format's abilities.
I confess I've no interest in this particular film, with its rather sordid and brutal subject matter. However, if you are out in the ether somewhere, Mr. Harris, I've a question for you, although I've no idea if you've worked behind the camera but I suspect you know cinematographers. And my question is the art of lighting a lost art, that is the way painting with light was done in some of the classic black and white films of the 1930s and 1940s, and even color. I have seen the Criterion Collection Blu-ray of Fincher's Benjamin Button, and that looked like film.
But do 21st century 'cameramen' have the knowledge of the late Jack Cardiff, whom you wrote about here:
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/313883/a-few-words-about-cameraman-the-life-and-work-of-jack-cardiff-in-blu-ray
To me the recent Oscar winner, The Artist, looked as if 1980s ILM blue screen photography were stripped of color: flat.
I wonder your thoughts. It's not a digital versus film issue, I suspect, I wonder if Mr. Cardiff discussed the passing of his skills to future generations. I think the knowledge may be lacking. Of course true artistry is a gift that can't be taught. Do you see in any recent work skilled use of chiaroscuro, for example?
Thanks.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,393
Real Name
Robert Harris
JParker said:
, looked as if 1980s ILM blue screen photography were stripped of color: flat.
I wonder your thoughts. It's not a digital versus film issue, I suspect, I wonder if Mr. Cardiff discussed the passing of his skills to future generations. I think the knowledge may be lacking. Of course true artistry is a gift that can't be taught. Do you see in any recent work skilled use of chiaroscuro, for example?
Thanks.
It has little to do with digital vs. film.

Every cinematographer that I have met or know, is a craftsperson.

Every project is different.

And one cannot compare Freddie Young's shafts of light, filtering their way through the apple barrel in Treasure Island (1950), to a multitude of new films, which are able to create an image with little or no light.

Many DPs are still "lighting cameramen," be they men or women. But it is the project that creates the demands for the specific look.

Do our current DPs know cinematography?

Absolutely.

They carry on a tradition, adding to the what came before, and taking away nothing, and adding.

Constantly adding.

To me, the cinematographers are the true heroes of film.

RAH
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,393
Real Name
Robert Harris
Originally Posted by JParker
I wonder your thoughts. It's not a digital versus film issue, I suspect, I wonder if Mr. Cardiff discussed the passing of his skills to future generations. I think the knowledge may be lacking. Of course true artistry is a gift that can't be taught. Do you see in any recent work skilled use of chiaroscuro, for example?
Thanks.

I neglected to hit "chiaroscuro," which brings us back to the concept of painting with light.

And I don't have an immediate answer for you. We can re-visit older films, especially those of Gordon Willis, like The Godfather, which are more of situation of taking away the light until you reach your goal.

This is actually an interesting point of discussion, as it relates to newer films, and the abilities of various chips to capture light and dark.

I'm going to have to reach out for answer.

RAH
 

JParker

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
309
Real Name
James Parker
Robert Harris said:
I neglected to hit "chiaroscuro," which brings us back to the concept of painting with light.
And I don't have an immediate answer for you.  We can re-visit older films, especially those of Gordon Willis, like The Godfather, which are more of situation of taking away the light until you reach your goal.
This is actually an interesting point of discussion, as it relates to newer films, and the abilities of various chips to capture light and dark.
I'm going to have to reach out for answer.
RAH
Mr. Harris, I can't thank you enough for your kind reply, it made my day! :) I hope others see this thread or you can elaborate on a special new post for the forum.
My best wishes,
James
 

JParker

Second Unit
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
309
Real Name
James Parker
Robert Harris said:
I neglected to hit "chiaroscuro," which brings us back to the concept of painting with light.
And I don't have an immediate answer for you.  We can re-visit older films, especially those of Gordon Willis, like The Godfather, which are more of situation of taking away the light until you reach your goal.
This is actually an interesting point of discussion, as it relates to newer films, and the abilities of various chips to capture light and dark.
I'm going to have to reach out for answer.
RAH
One final thought (and I wish this thread was in the Cardiff Blu-ray post) -- I still think the older films have a beauty, no matter the method, that so many modern day films don't have. For example, even if the lighting is highly 'theatrical' Gone With The Wind and Rebecca and Queen Christina exemplify 'painting with light' in a fashion that recent films can't match (my opinion, naturally). Of course, you did mention The Godfather but that is so many years ago. But the CGI comic books obviously are an entirely different genre.
Even Capra's Lady for a Day makes amazing use of light.
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/319458/lady-for-a-day-blu-ray-review
Well, anyone who has thoughts is welcome to contribute.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,393
Real Name
Robert Harris
Interesting where the mind goes...

Brought me to Freddie Young's work on Treasure Island (Disney), and Bobby Driscoll in the apple barrel.

RAH
 

Michel_Hafner

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 28, 2002
Messages
1,350
Finally watched it. There is a scene where I saw what usually would be called a grading error, a grading inconsistency within a scene. Now, I know Fincher is a stickler for technical perfection. There are no grading errors in his films. So I wonder why he graded that way. Anybody know which scene I'm talking about?
 

Dortmunder

Grip
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
16
Real Name
joe frady
Is it the lesbian club scene?
If so, the 'noise' was apparently deliberate on the part of the film makers, according to a discussion over on reduser.net with contributions from Ian Vertovec, the digital colour grader at Lightiron.
Personally, I never noticed anything outstandingly distracting, either on the 4K theatrical screenings I saw, or on my blu- ray.
 

Michel_Hafner

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 28, 2002
Messages
1,350
No, grading issue, not noise. It's the scene where Craig goes to Skarsgard's house the first time and they drink something together. It's evening or night I think and lights are on in the room...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,998
Messages
5,128,042
Members
144,228
Latest member
CoolMovies
Recent bookmarks
0
Top