Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

PHE Press Release: Hondo (Blu-ray)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
67 replies to this topic

#61 of 68 ONLINE   Bob Furmanek

Bob Furmanek

    Producer



  • 3,658 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2001

Posted March 13 2012 - 07:23 AM

Film Forum, and other revival theaters, presented these films 1.37 because they assumed that was correct and didn't know they were composed for widescreen. Dial M is composed for 1.85, House of Wax is not. Bob

Bob Furmanek

www.3dfilmarchive.com


Bubbleweb_edited-1_zpsc986b444.jpg


#62 of 68 OFFLINE   Jack Theakston

Jack Theakston

    Supporting Actor



  • 854 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2003

Posted March 13 2012 - 08:43 AM

I wouldn't judge anything by video frame grabs. You never know how far in the original picture has been zoomed-in on.
-J. Theakston

#63 of 68 OFFLINE   Stephen_J_H

Stephen_J_H

    Producer



  • 4,075 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen J. Hill
  • LocationNorth of the 49th

Posted March 13 2012 - 09:11 AM

Not to mention these grabs are 7 years old. Jack, when did you write your comprehensive article on Hondo?

"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player."-- Roger Ebert

#64 of 68 OFFLINE   Jack Theakston

Jack Theakston

    Supporting Actor



  • 854 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2003

Posted March 14 2012 - 04:06 AM

Bob and I published that article in October, 2007.
-J. Theakston

#65 of 68 OFFLINE   Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Producer



  • 4,263 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted March 14 2012 - 04:13 AM

It was wonderful.  Got any more of those??  Posted Image



#66 of 68 ONLINE   Bob Furmanek

Bob Furmanek

    Producer



  • 3,658 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2001

Posted March 14 2012 - 06:33 AM

That article was a LOT of work and was basically done to combat all the PR and spin that Hondo was only shown in a few theaters in 3-D and that it was originally anaglyph. Plus, they were claiming it was a new restoration when in fact, Dan Symmes and Michael Wayne had already restored it on 35mm film years earlier. Of course, the same myth exists about KISS ME KATE hardly playing anywhere in 3-D in 1953... Bob

Bob Furmanek

www.3dfilmarchive.com


Bubbleweb_edited-1_zpsc986b444.jpg


#67 of 68 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted March 14 2012 - 10:52 AM

I remember posting a link to the HONDO article back in 2007 or 2008. So much mis-information was circulating. Solid research and lucid writing actually did a lot of good, I think.

#68 of 68 ONLINE   Bob Furmanek

Bob Furmanek

    Producer



  • 3,658 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2001

Posted March 15 2012 - 06:54 AM

Thank you Richard. Our goal was to set the record straight... Bob

Bob Furmanek

www.3dfilmarchive.com


Bubbleweb_edited-1_zpsc986b444.jpg