Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Interview with Twilight Time: Nick Redman on who they are, their business model and more.

Twilight Time Interview

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
244 replies to this topic

#1 of 245 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer



  • 15,072 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted December 24 2011 - 12:10 PM



#2 of 245 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer



  • 12,486 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted December 24 2011 - 02:11 PM

A wonderfully detailed interview that helps us get to know Nick and the TGwilight Time folks so much better. Thank you so much for doing this, Adam.,

#3 of 245 OFFLINE   Jack P

Jack P

    Producer



  • 3,507 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 15 2006

Posted December 24 2011 - 02:22 PM

Much as I appreciate the work Nick is doing, I have to disagree quite vigorously on the score replacement on "Major Dundee". I am absolutely 100% opposed to the idea of commissioning a new score for a film decades after the fact in any circumstance. The original Amfitheatrof score is not perfect, but it's the one I want to hear when I watch the film, and I sincerely hope that the Blu-Ray isn't going to deny me the chance of watching the film with it (at least the DVD allowed me to watch it properly).

#4 of 245 OFFLINE   Douglas Monce

Douglas Monce

    Producer



  • 5,514 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2006

Posted December 24 2011 - 02:32 PM

Fantastic interview. And I will be all over The Big Heat!!! Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers

#5 of 245 OFFLINE   Richard Gallagher

Richard Gallagher

    Producer



  • 3,311 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Gallagher
  • LocationFishkill, NY

Posted December 24 2011 - 04:02 PM

Outstanding interview! I'm happy to support Nick & Brian (I already have several Twilight Time titles), and I'm thrilled that they are letting us review their releases.
Rich Gallagher

#6 of 245 OFFLINE   Bob Cashill

Bob Cashill

    Screenwriter



  • 2,381 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2001

Posted December 24 2011 - 04:02 PM

"With Columbia the films that we are releasing are titles they have ready for Blu-ray but are not on their schedule. They are films that are already on DVD in the Columbia catalogue. They want us to focus on Blu-rays they seem to feel there isn't a market for themselves. So that is how we got things like Mysterious Island, Fright Night, Picnic and Pal Joey and other titles." That speaks volumes about how the studios view their catalog titles and our interests. Thanks, Twilight Time, for being their "guinea pig."

#7 of 245 OFFLINE   Bob Cashill

Bob Cashill

    Screenwriter



  • 2,381 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2001

Posted December 24 2011 - 04:18 PM

And this, so key (such a good interview): "For me, I have had many, many great experiences working with studio video divisions over the years on a lot of projects and I never thought the day would come when the studios would allow us to license the films from them. Given how huge DVD was and how much money the studios were raking in hand over fist in the late 90s and early 2000s, right up to 2007-2008. I never thought the business would decline to the degree that they would, in a sense, prefer to outsource to a third party. But that day has come and it’s come in spades, because I don’t see the situation ever reversing. I think that home video, the physical media, is going to be like the soundtrack business became in the 90s, which is when the major labels got out of soundtracks, and the future of releases depended on niche labels to carry the entire weight of that small world. And I think that DVD and Blu-ray particularly is going to devolve to a third party world while the studios concentrate much more on the digital future: downloading and streaming and beaming it into your house directly. Physical media is coming to an end, which is why we called the label Twilight Time. I mean that was the joke: it’s Twilight Time."

#8 of 245 OFFLINE   ahollis

ahollis

    Producer



  • 6,048 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted December 24 2011 - 04:39 PM

This answers a lot of people's questions.  Thanks for the outstanding interview, you asked the right questions and they really expanded on the answers.  I have also just ordered Rapture.  What salesmen they are.

"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#9 of 245 OFFLINE   AnthonyP

AnthonyP

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 145 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003

Posted December 24 2011 - 08:27 PM

Great interview. Thank you. As much as I acknowledge the realities of the market, I still wish there was a middle ground. I know that isn't ground a boutique label like TT has much of any say on as they are just trying to be one of the few middle men left in a horse and carriage marketplace. I do wish the final debate wasn't about consumers being entitled or a market solely driven on new releases, top tier catalog titles and then MSRP limited pricing models for die hards as I think, though I'm sure I'm wrong in a marketing and accounting driven world, that is a model destined to shrink and hasten an already retreating mindset of purchasing movies. Instead of studios licensing things for up to 50%, or whatever it is, of a ~$30 MSRP model for some of the titles they do, they would feel less entitled about movies being of a certain value to consumers and take greater effort licensing things for a lower amount which then might help lessen that retreat. Entitled is such a loaded word in my opinion but seems to come up no matter where this discussion takes place. Personally, I see it more about value. Consumers, in terms of the so called Walmart shopper, place a different value on buying movies than studios place on them and what any middle men then needs to sell them for in order for a sustainable market to exist. It is part of the reason, one of many, that things have dramatically shifted back towards a consume and forget renting, streaming and download market. Consumers no longer find the value worth it in comparison and at the same time studios feel entitled for them to continue to sell at a higher price range. Ultimately, the studios probably don't care since they seemingly have diverted their attention to that model also but I fear that drawing such a huge wedge between that and MSRP for die hard collectors is going to do as much to further that. Back to wishing there was more of a middle ground. Instead of shrinking the pie at higher prices in order for studios to price enforce the value they place on some of their catalog titles (again, not speaking about all, or even most as a ton of them aren't going to have much of any market no matter the price), bring some attention back into keeping as many people buying as possible. Even die hards are going to eventually siphon off if the catalog model becomes $30 a pop. At first, it will become about lessening blind buys, which catalog titles need since fewer people are going to remember and love a number of these films. Then it will be about just buying select favorites. Then about buying less in addition to other films at those price points. Then supplementing that via streaming, downloads, and things like the HD movie pack channels from Sony, MGM, etc. It will be like the baseball audience after a strike. Though the marketplace is moving in that direction due to fatigue, changes in consuming behavior in general, tiring and seeing (no matter if accurate or not) things released and re-released, recycled less than quality HD masters (finally starting to improve from the majors.. if not a number of others), there is going to be a a 5-10 year decline in movie audience until the streaming model fully kicks in. I just wish studios were looking to sustain as much of that audience as possible short of resorting to accepting a MSRP market for some catalog titles that, perhaps wrongly, I think is going to cause some long term decline in film fans which might impact the industry as whole (theatrical, physical media and then eventually some form of streaming or what not). Perhaps that is all a known factor though. Knowing that there is more/enough money in the ~$100 month tiered plans 5-10-20 years in the future so that even non-film fans will still pay the top tier price just to know they can then watch anything they want even if they rarely do. I know there are many different sides so I hope no one will take anything I said as anything more than just some random thinking aloud. Everyone from the studios to labels to retailers to consumers are going to do whatever they feel meets there needs so none of this is meant as anything more than just an impulse to share and discuss. I'm glad and grateful for as many films that get released in quality presentations from the lower to highest prices models. I'll try to buy as many as I can for as long as I can. Though even now, when six months ago I wouldn't have even entertained the thought, I'm struggling envisioning my place in what physical media has in store. Whether it is to buy as many as the more affordable releases as I can, a mix and match favoring one model over or another or, gasp, maybe considering moving to just enjoying what I already have with something like MGM HD and such. I'd buy nearly every single quality catalog I could from companies like Criterion but, even with their frequent 50% off sales of ~$20, I never could justify the cost/value for myself personally when I've seen so few of them. Maybe I should spend more time watching TCM. :)

#10 of 245 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted December 24 2011 - 11:07 PM

Thank you Adam Gregorich for that informative interview. I will make a point of keeping up with Twilight Time releases. Some of the titles do interest me. I share Nick Redman's interest in the films of Cy Endfield and John Guillermin. I didn't realize Rapture was a Guillermin film: I thought it was the more recent Rapture with Mimi Rogers. In any case I will buy the Twilight Time release now. To release such an obscure art film with virtually no cult following testifies to Twilight Time's dedication. Let's hope it finds an audience. I do wish you had found a way to ask Nick Redman what he thought of Paul Seydor's recut version of Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, and also, if he actually directed the featurettes for WB's Sam Peckinpah box-set. It is difficult to reconcile the amateur quality of those featurettes with the high degree of professionalism and artistry of Redman's other work.

Much as I appreciate the work Nick is doing, I have to disagree quite vigorously on the score replacement on "Major Dundee". I am absolutely 100% opposed to the idea of commissioning a new score for a film decades after the fact in any circumstance. The original Amfitheatrof score is not perfect, but it's the one I want to hear when I watch the film, and I sincerely hope that the Blu-Ray isn't going to deny me the chance of watching the film with it (at least the DVD allowed me to watch it properly).

Properly? How any one can listen to Mitch Miller and the Gang chant "Fall in behind the major!" and think it's a proper song, or a proper score is beyond me. It was a willfully destructive score imposed on the film to sabotage the director. Daniele Amfitheatrof must have been writing for War and Peace. Watching Major Dundee with a score that the director adamantly opposed as being wrong for the film is not watching it properly. Or don't you think the director should have a say in how his story is told? I don't see what you have to complain about. You can watch the film with the wrong score anytime you want. It's an option on the DVD, and there's no reason to assume the Blu-ray won't be exactly the same. Or you can listen to every bang and clash of Daniele Amfitheatrof and the sing-alongs with Mitch Miller and the Gang on the DRG soundtrack CD. Christopher Caliendo's score is a rescue, not a replacement. It may not be perfect, but it is less further away from Peckinpah's style and intentions than what the film ended up with. You don't have to choose the Christopher Caliendo option if you don't want to. Sometimes, things happen at the bureaucratic level -- a personality conflict between the director and the bean counters, a studio executive who thinks he knows better than the filmmakers, or a rush job to meet a schedule -- resulting in a bad score imposed on a film. Or a silent film score is lost and a new one is needed for a restoration. In such cases a new score by a composer who is sympatico with the film is necessary. Posted Image Now if only MGM would rescue John Huston's The Unforgiven (1960) from Dimitri Tiomkin's hideously adversarial, inappropriate, and poorly recorded score ...

#11 of 245 OFFLINE   Michael Allred

Michael Allred

    Screenwriter



  • 1,718 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000
  • Real Name:Michael
  • LocationMI

Posted December 25 2011 - 12:29 AM

People keep talking about streaming like it's viable. It's not. There are so many issues/problems/variables involved with that whole way of thinking that it will take so much time to iron out and even then, there will be people like myself who don't consider it "owning" a movie via some cloud streaming service. Anyway, it was indeed an insightful interview that gave me a new perspective on the whole thing. I don't agree with everything the gentleman said but it is what it is.

#12 of 245 OFFLINE   Jack P

Jack P

    Producer



  • 3,507 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 15 2006

Posted December 25 2011 - 12:49 AM

Properly? How any one can listen to Mitch Miller and the Gang chant "Fall in behind the major!" and think it's a proper song, or a proper score is beyond me. ..

Well suit yourself, to me it's beyond me to understand at all why substituting a music score decades after the fact is somehow okay. I despised the music replacement on the DVD releases of "The Fugitive" and I despise the tamperings George Lucas has made to the SW trilogy. I do not want a film to be a mishmash of things concocted long after the fact and out of the time in which they were first made on general principle and I'm sticking to that rule regardless of what film it is. Besides, the music is not the problem that dragged the film down it was the script and Peckinpah's inability to know what the hell he was doing. The first half of the film is terrific, the second half detours with pointless turns in the plot that bring everything to a halt. Is the song a little jarring? Yeah, but I like the main theme and I also like the "stingers" when the Apache are mentioned because when they pop in again after a half hour they end up offering a reminder of how far off-track the film has gotten. Amfitheatrof has gotten a bum rap on all levels IMO to try and obfuscate the fact that Peckinpah only had himself to blame for what was going wrong with the film, and maybe that's why I'm even more inclined to not trust his judgment on the music given that his judgment on the story was all off. Defering to the director on everything all the time is a standard I've never accepted, and I'm not about to begin for a guy who singlehandedly screwed up the film in areas more important than the score. The alternate score gets zero listening from me on any version, and I make no apology for sticking to that perspective. At least I'm staying consistent in terms of how I judge music replacement on other properties. Music replacement is as wrong as colorization is for films, period and the ONLY circumstance in which I will accept an alternate music score track is if we are dealing with an alternate score composed AT THE TIME but was rejected. If you want to included Herrmann's rejected "Torn Curtain" score on an alternate track that's one thing, but a score composed decades later to replace a pre-existing one because of as subjective opinion that is not a truism etched in life is a stupid idea whether for "Major Dundee" or with the Mark Heyes replacement music on "The Fugitive". What about films that we think "ruined the director's vision" as a result of someone's belief that a key part was miscast? Do we someday, when we perfect the technology "rescue" the film by digitally removing the actor and replacing him with another one who wasn't alive at the time? If you're going to use technology to tamper with one part of the creative process for the sake of "improving" it, then you might as well go the whole enchilada. Let's digitally replace actors that someone thinks weren't good enough, let's get soundalikes to redub lines actors didn't properly deliver or digitally alter their words to "improve" the dialogue....it all stems from the same wrongheaded impulse that was behind the Caliendo score and it destroys the ability of a film to stand the test of time properly as a product of when it was made. Footage shot at the time and cut I'm all for seeing. Seeing alterations that wrench the film out of its era is another thing entirely.

#13 of 245 OFFLINE   Felix Martinez

Felix Martinez

    Screenwriter



  • 1,459 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 27 2001
  • LocationSouth Florida

Posted December 25 2011 - 12:57 AM

Outstanding interview.  And I'll be closely following what TT does going forward. My only thought/concern about this very limited model is that an increasing number of speculators will see gold in them thar hills, and buy up the lion's share of certain titles to re-sell at a premium - effectively becoming additional distributors generating revenue streams beyond the control of TT and the studio.  Of course this isn't new and there are things that can be done to mitigate this, but there will be ways around them.

#14 of 245 OFFLINE   RickER

RickER

    Producer



  • 5,130 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 04 2003
  • Real Name:Rick
  • LocationTulsa, Oklahoma

Posted December 25 2011 - 01:55 AM

That was a great interview. Thank you Adam, and Nick. I also have to make a comment about the entitlement that "we" may have toward cheap product. The way i see it, I had no problem spending $35 for Fright Night. It was well worth it. However, if that title were being sold at Wal-Mart, or Best buy, I would be crazy to spend that much for it. Why? Because as sure as I buy it, the next week it would be $15. Then you could call me a sucker. I also bought laser disc back in the day. I had no problem spending $40-$80 for a title. But I also didn't have to worry about it being $20 the next week. The price was the price. It was rare that you would get a "deal". I also never owned more than 200 LDs, compared to the thousands of DVDs and Blu-rays I have bought, and in many cases, re-bought! So yes, if Blu-rays cost $30-$40 I would still buy them, but I would be buying fewer. I only have so much money to spend on that kind of stuff. I might buy something now cause it is $15, but I will be a bit more selective if it is $35. Nick, thanks for what you guys at TT are doing. I wish you well, and hope to buy from you again. If i may make a suggestion? Sci-fi, horror, action, and westerns make this 48-year-old man a happy boy! :)

#15 of 245 OFFLINE   ahollis

ahollis

    Producer



  • 6,048 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted December 25 2011 - 03:38 AM



Originally Posted by Felix Martinez 

Outstanding interview.  And I'll be closely following what TT does going forward.


My only thought/concern about this very limited model is that an increasing number of speculators will see gold in them thar hills, and buy up the lion's share of certain titles to re-sell at a premium - effectively becoming additional distributors generating revenue streams beyond the control of TT and the studio.  Of course this isn't new and there are things that can be done to mitigate this, but there will be ways around them.


I think your concerns are correct.  On another forum, a poster was commenting on his five FRIGHT NIGHT Blu-rays he has on sale at e-bay and is concerned with all the previous posts that are insisting that Twilight Time has produced more that 3000 copies and will release them later in 2012.  I think that we know that is not true and 3000 is the limit and FRIGHT NIGHT is sold out but this guy has five and he bought five to re-sell at a premium.  Oh well that is private enterprise and what the market will bare.


"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#16 of 245 OFFLINE   Ryan Megan

Ryan Megan

    Auditioning



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 25 2011

Posted December 25 2011 - 03:45 AM

Great interview except for the "Occupy Twilight Time” quip, I don't come here to read about your personal feelings on the Occupy movement. Just really weird comment to put into this interview unsolicited. If you want to spend time comparing people in the Occupy movement with kids whining for free Blu-rays - might I suggest Foxnews.com. It's a shame because other than that it was an excellent read.

#17 of 245 OFFLINE   Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor



  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted December 25 2011 - 03:56 AM

Great interview Adam- probably the best I can ever recall reading on this forum. It pulls the curtain back and answers or confirms most of my questions and suspicions. It helps greatly as a consumer to understand the forces swirling around behind everything, to adjust and anticipate as far as budgeting goes, going forward.

The way i see it, I had no problem spending $35 for Fright Night. It was well worth it. However, if that title were being sold at Wal-Mart, or Best buy, I would be crazy to spend that much for it. Why? Because as sure as I buy it, the next week it would be $15. Then you could call me a sucker. I also bought laser disc back in the day. I had no problem spending $40-$80 for a title. But I also didn't have to worry about it being $20 the next week. The price was the price. It was rare that you would get a "deal". I also never owned more than 200 LDs, compared to the thousands of DVDs and Blu-rays I have bought, and in many cases, re-bought! So yes, if Blu-rays cost $30-$40 I would still buy them, but I would be buying fewer. I only have so much money to spend on that kind of stuff. I might buy something now cause it is $15, but I will be a bit more selective if it is $35.

These are my feelings as well. I can accept the higher price tag of a limited run item. But the downside is it will definitely curtail a lot of my purchasing in the future. It's going to be hard to put the genie back in the bottle as far as mass market pricing goes. I'm sorry the studios made the mistake of devaluing their product so quickly- but I always assumed that was a last ditch strategy to get some kind of mass adoption taking hold which it apparently wasn't doing naturally. While I understand the need to pay $35 for one of only 3000 copies, I certainly don't see the need to pay $25 for one of 75,000. Also if Mr. Redman is keeping an eye on this thread- Fox had indicated years ago that it was on the cusp of releasing a Pre-Code boxset which would include the two Clara Bow Talkies (Call Her Savage and Hoopla) along with Story Of Temple Drake and others. Then the market imploded and this dissolved into the ether. Any chance you or Shout could pick this project back up and release it yourselves? A box set like this seems to me a big no-brainer because it hits several niche groups that are starved for quality content- the pre-code fans as well as Bow fans. And since none of these have shown up on home video before, a release in one fell swoop would be a very big deal. I'd be willing to kick out some substantial coin for a truly limited release set done well ("well" meaning good masters properly encoded).

#18 of 245 OFFLINE   Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor



  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted December 25 2011 - 04:04 AM

I think your concerns are correct.  On another forum, a poster was commenting on his five FRIGHT NIGHT Blu-rays he has on sale at e-bay and is concerned with all the previous posts that are insisting that Twilight Time has produced more that 3000 copies and will release them later in 2012.  I think that we know that is not true and 3000 is the limit and FRIGHT NIGHT is sold out but this guy has five and he bought five to re-sell at a premium.  Oh well that is private enterprise and what the market will bare.   

Yeah, we'll see just how rabid the fan base is for that title when the buy-in price hits $60 and up. Maybe he'll sell em all- but maybe he won't. Maybe he'll hit a ceiling and have to reduce the price to unload them all. In any event, now we know the window is only three years. While Sony still may not want to release it in 2014, the odds are someone else will license it then and put it out again.

#19 of 245 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted December 25 2011 - 04:21 AM

Well suit yourself, to me it's beyond me to understand at all why substituting a music score decades after the fact is somehow okay. I despised the music replacement on the DVD releases of "The Fugitive" and I despise the tamperings George Lucas has made to the SW trilogy. I do not want a film to be a mishmash of things concocted long after the fact and out of the time in which they were first made on general principle and I'm sticking to that rule regardless of what film it is. Besides, the music is not the problem that dragged the film down it was the script and Peckinpah's inability to know what the hell he was doing. The first half of the film is terrific, the second half detours with pointless turns in the plot that bring everything to a halt. Is the song a little jarring? Yeah, but I like the main theme and I also like the "stingers" when the Apache are mentioned because when they pop in again after a half hour they end up offering a reminder of how far off-track the film has gotten. Amfitheatrof has gotten a bum rap on all levels IMO to try and obfuscate the fact that Peckinpah only had himself to blame for what was going wrong with the film, and maybe that's why I'm even more inclined to not trust his judgment on the music given that his judgment on the story was all off. Defering to the director on everything all the time is a standard I've never accepted, and I'm not about to begin for a guy who singlehandedly screwed up the film in areas more important than the score. The alternate score gets zero listening from me on any version, and I make no apology for sticking to that perspective. At least I'm staying consistent in terms of how I judge music replacement on other properties. Music replacement is as wrong as colorization is for films, period and the ONLY circumstance in which I will accept an alternate music score track is if we are dealing with an alternate score composed AT THE TIME but was rejected. If you want to included Herrmann's rejected "Torn Curtain" score on an alternate track that's one thing, but a score composed decades later to replace a pre-existing one because of as subjective opinion that is not a truism etched in life is a stupid idea whether for "Major Dundee" or with the Mark Heyes replacement music on "The Fugitive". What about films that we think "ruined the director's vision" as a result of someone's belief that a key part was miscast? Do we someday, when we perfect the technology "rescue" the film by digitally removing the actor and replacing him with another one who wasn't alive at the time? If you're going to use technology to tamper with one part of the creative process for the sake of "improving" it, then you might as well go the whole enchilada. Let's digitally replace actors that someone thinks weren't good enough, let's get soundalikes to redub lines actors didn't properly deliver or digitally alter their words to "improve" the dialogue....it all stems from the same wrongheaded impulse that was behind the Caliendo score and it destroys the ability of a film to stand the test of time properly as a product of when it was made. Footage shot at the time and cut I'm all for seeing. Seeing alterations that wrench the film out of its era is another thing entirely.

I'm with you. I like the original score better too.

#20 of 245 OFFLINE   Michael Allred

Michael Allred

    Screenwriter



  • 1,718 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000
  • Real Name:Michael
  • LocationMI

Posted December 25 2011 - 07:52 AM

That was a great interview. Thank you Adam, and Nick. I also have to make a comment about the entitlement that "we" may have toward cheap product. The way i see it, I had no problem spending $35 for Fright Night. It was well worth it. However, if that title were being sold at Wal-Mart, or Best buy, I would be crazy to spend that much for it. Why? Because as sure as I buy it, the next week it would be $15. Then you could call me a sucker. I also bought laser disc back in the day. I had no problem spending $40-$80 for a title. But I also didn't have to worry about it being $20 the next week. The price was the price. It was rare that you would get a "deal". I also never owned more than 200 LDs, compared to the thousands of DVDs and Blu-rays I have bought, and in many cases, re-bought! So yes, if Blu-rays cost $30-$40 I would still buy them, but I would be buying fewer. I only have so much money to spend on that kind of stuff. I might buy something now cause it is $15, but I will be a bit more selective if it is $35. Nick, thanks for what you guys at TT are doing. I wish you well, and hope to buy from you again. If i may make a suggestion? Sci-fi, horror, action, and westerns make this 48-year-old man a happy boy! :)

I would also suggest sci-fi and horror as well. I'd be willing to bet those will sell far faster than VERY niche "classic" titles as "Fright Night" has proven.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users