Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Drive - quick review


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 of 18 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Advanced Member

  • 37,405 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted September 19 2011 - 04:24 AM

I wanted to like this movie more, but in the end, I just don't have any real affinity to the driver dude (Gosling). Sure, the extended gazing/staring scenes didn't help things, and I never got the idea he really knew what he was getting into when it goes really bad. There are some nice stylistic choices and touches (the whole 70s vibe in terms of tone, cinematography), but having an enigmatic protagonist just didn't work for me. I give it 2.5 stars, or a grade of C+.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#2 of 18 Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator

  • 23,163 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted September 19 2011 - 06:16 AM

I loved this film as it reminded me of films from yesteryear.  Some elements of early Michael Mann films like Thief as well as some R-rated films from the late 1960s and early 1970s.  The Driver character was the best thing from this film and his ambivalent actions even made it moreso for me.  I'm glad he's not one of these characters in which his motivations and actions are easily spelled out.  Obviously, he had a past life in which some events from that past life were contrary in nature which in turn made him a very complex character on how he reacted to certain people and events today.  Film grade-wise I'll give the film a solid B+.









Crawdaddy


Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#3 of 18 Carlos_E

Carlos_E

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 142 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 30 2000

Posted September 19 2011 - 11:19 AM

Great film. My favorite film so far this year. I loved the cinematography. Long camera takes and slow camera tracking shots are so refreshing. This is the anti Michael Bay film. As Robert mentioned, the Michael Mann influence is definitely there. But I was reminded of more recent Mann films. The night scenes including the overhead helicopter perspectives and the way the shots are angled reminded me of Collateral and Heat. The music soundtrack is fantastic. It is awesome. I will buy this soundtrack. I give the film 4 stars or a grade of A

#4 of 18 Elizabeth S

Elizabeth S

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,345 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2001

Posted September 19 2011 - 11:47 AM

I think I liked it more for having an enigmatic protagonist. The trailer for this didn't look that interesting, but from the opening sequence, the film grabbed me. It's more about the atmosphere and how it lulls you by the Driver's soft-spoken and almost shy behavior before it totally jars you by its violent turn. It is admittedly way more graphic than I normally like, but that wasn't enough to turn me off to it. I know some don't like the "staring" and "silences", but I thought it worked perfectly for the mood of the film.

#5 of 18 todd s

todd s

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 6,807 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted September 22 2011 - 03:36 PM

To many awkward pauses in a lot of the scenes. I did get a whole 80's vibe from the opening credits. :) One thing regarding a plot from the end.... [SPOILER=Warning: Spoiler!]Could the driver have left some money for the mother? ;) [/SPOILER]
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#6 of 18 JonZ

JonZ

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 7,793 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 28 1998

Posted September 22 2011 - 04:56 PM

She refused the money.


I found that one song used twice in the film including the ending to be unbearable. A pretty terrible choice that I found to be totally distracting. The music choices for Bronson (which is a film I REALLY like) were so strong, I found the choice to be a baffling.


Thought the film had some real moments of brilliance though. Will have to see it again.


On a side note, it was kind of funny to see the mask used in the film and come out of the theater to see this poster in the lobby...

http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/



#7 of 18 Russell G

Russell G

    Fake Shemp

  • PipPipPip
  • 9,520 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted September 28 2011 - 04:02 AM

I was on the fence with this one. I liked it, and thought it interesting and well crafted. My main problem was that I found it hysterically funny. I left not knowing if it was supposed to be serious or an ironic satire. Which is a pretty big problem I guess. 3/5


My wallet cries me to sleep!
 
This post kills threads!


#8 of 18 Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator

  • 23,163 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted September 28 2011 - 04:18 AM



Originally Posted by Russell G 

I was on the fence with this one. I liked it, and thought it interesting and well crafted. My main problem was that I found it hysterically funny. I left not knowing if it was supposed to be serious or an ironic satire. Which is a pretty big problem I guess. 3/5



What was so funny?



Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#9 of 18 Russell G

Russell G

    Fake Shemp

  • PipPipPip
  • 9,520 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted September 28 2011 - 04:58 AM



Originally Posted by Robert Crawford 





What was so funny?



You had the tone of a film that seemed to be a character study, with the character having zero personality and that dopey, blank look on his face. I didn't find him enigmatic, I found him possibly mentally deficient or slow. Combined with the graphic violence and the ridiculous jacket he never took off (even when it was pretty much ruined!) and I found myself laughing and wondering "Is this for real?"


And Albert Brooks was laugh out loud funny as per usual as the tough guy, as was Ron Perlman when they played off each other.


In the end, I just can't take it seriously.




My wallet cries me to sleep!
 
This post kills threads!


#10 of 18 Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator

  • 23,163 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted September 29 2011 - 11:15 AM



Originally Posted by Russell G 

You had the tone of a film that seemed to be a character study, with the character having zero personality and that dopey, blank look on his face. I didn't find him enigmatic, I found him possibly mentally deficient or slow. Combined with the graphic violence and the ridiculous jacket he never took off (even when it was pretty much ruined!) and I found myself laughing and wondering "Is this for real?"


And Albert Brooks was laugh out loud funny as per usual as the tough guy, as was Ron Perlman when they played off each other.


In the end, I just can't take it seriously.





Interesting take, not one I share, but interesting.



Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#11 of 18 Henry Gale

Henry Gale

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,633 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 10 1999

Posted September 29 2011 - 02:37 PM



Originally Posted by Patrick Sun 

...the extended gazing/staring scenes didn't help things...

 




One of the things I loved best, the luxury of taking time. Reminded me somewhat of Noodles stirring his tea in "Once Upon A Time In America".


"Drive" was excellent.


"I was born to ramble, born to rove
Some men are searchin for the Holy Grail
But there ain't nothin sweeter 
Than riden' the rails."
-Tom Waits-

#12 of 18 Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 7,075 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted September 30 2011 - 06:35 AM

I thought the film was excellent and it was certainly unlike anything I have seen before. Yes, there are obvious influences but the director took them and did his own thing with them. Sort of what Tarantino has been doing his entire career. Films like BREATHLESS and PULP FICTION really changed how movies were made and I can see this one doing the same thing. It's a shame not too many people are eating it up but doing an arthouse action film was pretty brave. Too many movies today are made for mindless zombies. Movies are pretty much expected to follow the "rules" and give the audiance what they want. What was so refreshing about this picture is that it did what it wanted. The slow pace. Not spelling everything out with the characters. The Gosling/Mulligan relationship. The ending. The money. The film had balls, which is something lacking from 99% of those movies opening with $30+ million weekends.

#13 of 18 R-T-C Tim

R-T-C Tim

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 192 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2006

Posted October 02 2011 - 08:56 PM

A superb art-house take on the crime movie. Long languorous driving scenes with beautiful long-lensed camera work, combined with a kick-in-the-teeth storyline (the ending was superb). Obviously not one for audiences wanting a Hugh Jackman car-porn action flick (which this was originally going to be before Gosling came on board and brought director Refn in).
Mondo Esoterica.net - From the Wild West to Gothic Europe...

#14 of 18 EricW

EricW

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted February 04 2012 - 03:28 AM



just watched this and i had a plot question:


in the hotel scene, just before the 2 hitters come in, the Driver gets a call or text or something, that might be a "get out of there" message.  what's the story behind this?

thanks


btw loved the movie.

"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#15 of 18 Jeff Cooper

Jeff Cooper

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2000

Posted February 06 2012 - 05:37 AM

If I remember correctly, that was Christina Hendrick's phone, that got the text, not the Drivers.  We didn't see what it was, but it was presumably some message to her, that tipped the driver off that something was about to go down.

Originally Posted by EricW 



just watched this and i had a plot question:


in the hotel scene, just before the 2 hitters come in, the Driver gets a call or text or something, that might be a "get out of there" message.  what's the story behind this?

thanks


btw loved the movie.





-Jeff Cooper

"Curse you inspector Dim! You are too clever for us naughty people."

#16 of 18 Walter Kittel

Walter Kittel

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,472 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 28 1998

Posted February 06 2012 - 06:35 AM

If I remember correctly, that was Christina Hendrick's phone, that got the text, not the Drivers. We didn't see what it was, but it was presumably some message to her, that tipped the driver off that something was about to go down.

I had my first viewing of Drive this weekend (via Blu-ray) and yes, that is how I interpreted the scene. Very impressed with this feature which felt like an instant noir classic combining B movie sensibilities with excellent craftsmanship. The film had a very dreamlike quality which was a result of the stripped down nature of the narrative combined with exquisite cinematography that used long static takes, gradual zooms, excellent framing, and slow motion tracking shots to produce something that felt very much out of the ordinary. The quiet nature of some sequences provides a very stark contrast to the moments of violence in the film; making the latter produce a visceral response. From the standpoint of relating the film to predecessors; Drive felt influenced by Michael Mann's Heat; the much earlier Bullitt for both the car elements and Steve McQueen's performance that is echoed in Gosling's driver; Breathless and possibly Le Samorai and even Vanishing Point for the existential nature of the plot and the concept of a individual that works by a code or precept. All in all a film that I am happy to mention in the same breath as these classics. - Walter.
Fidelity to the source should always be the goal for Blu-ray releases.

#17 of 18 EricW

EricW

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted February 06 2012 - 11:15 AM

thanks - that makes sense


"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#18 of 18 Todd Smigelski

Todd Smigelski

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2001

Posted February 06 2012 - 02:10 PM

I found this take on drive interesting and not mentioned here. Drive




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users