Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Contagion - quick review

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,896 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted September 14 2011 - 07:52 AM

I wanted to like "Contagion" more, as it features Steven Soderbergh at the directorial helm, and an Oscar-studded cast of winners and nominees. Overall, I think the script was too briskly paced, without as much background details to ground the story of a viral outbreak that threatens to reach pandemic levels. There are many players in the story, and the film just bounces from subplot to subplot (or character groupings) until it finally concludes. I didn't like the musical score, it tended to make the film feel too euro-pop-ish, public access station-ish at times, which didn't help things. If you're a germophobe, this film won't help you with that condition. It'll make you think twice about touching any object out in contact with the general public. I give it 2.75 stars, or a grade of B-.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   mattCR


    Executive Producer

  • 10,066 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted September 15 2011 - 02:18 AM

You're much kinder then I'd be.   It's a film that could be surmised as a new-Outer Limits episode or the "results" section of "The Stand" or a different take on the Andromeda Strain.. I don't know, by the time we were about 1/2 way into it, I realized the characters were not very compelling and the story kept bouncing around making me care about them less.

There isn't a very cohesive narrative that grabs you and the drama falls flat.

On your scale, I'd say a C.  Maybe a rental.


Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,896 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted September 15 2011 - 02:59 AM

I probably was kinder than usual (I almost gave it a C+). One more thing that bugged me about the movie, it's not shot on film, so to my eye, the production values looked much cheaper in terms of the look of the movie, it had that Movie-of-the-week video look to it in many scenes.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#4 of 7 OFFLINE   Greg Kettell

Greg Kettell


  • 1,188 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1998
  • Real Name:Greg K.
  • LocationNY Capital Region

Posted September 15 2011 - 06:03 AM

I liked it overall (and I liked the score, too). They were going for realism, which is actually somewhat refreshing for a Hollywood movie. The cast did a great job. The myriad story arcs did serve to limit the drama, though. I think it would have worked much better as a TV miniseries than as a feature film.

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson


  • 5,265 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted September 21 2011 - 01:59 AM

It's "Traffic" with germs.  Enjoyable movie but not as good as it could/should have been.  Agree that it would've worked better in a longer format - it just crams in too many characters/situations for many of them to work.  The one with Marion Cotillard felt especially weak...

Colin Jacobson

#6 of 7 ONLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 14,402 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted October 21 2011 - 01:11 PM

Excellent movie. I loved it. It deliberately lacks oversized characters or big major events. It simply takes a scenario -- what if an epidemic on par with the 1918 flu pandemic happened today? -- and plays it out as realistically as possible given the constraints of the movie format. It's chilling because it starts like the sort of virus we've seen with SARS and the swine flu, and then escalates so much further. The movie maintains its deliberate pacing even as events start to go terribly out of hand. Unlike most horror movies, the boogey man here is very real, and it's probably only a matter of time.

#7 of 7 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Lead Actor

  • 9,761 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted October 24 2011 - 10:22 AM

It's a race against time. The next pandemic vs. scientist's efforts to create a universal flu vaccine. I for one am interested in seeing this movie. I know (and like) Soderbergh's style, so I may be kinder than most towards this film. This is a nice reminder for me to schedule my flu shot though...

XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)