Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Lucasfilm on Star Wars the Complete Saga Blu-ray: Hands on Report

Interview

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
505 replies to this topic

#21 of 506 Coressel

Coressel

    Supporting Actor

  • 668 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 1999

Posted August 21 2011 - 07:29 AM


But the entire movie was captured on film, so when we went from film process into the DVD, a lot of the things from the DVD magnify the image of the film, and we lost about 8% of the picture there.


Is that 8% additional picture in each of the 6 movies, or just TPM?



#22 of 506 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 07:48 AM

This was posted another forum: "Another example of product confusion is with this HTF review they are providing screen captures which they say came from the DVD yet are at 1540x866 resolution. The 2004 Star Wars DVDs were not that resolution." They are pretty much saying HTF is sheep-like in falling for all the BS Lucasfilm's spokespeople throw at them.

#23 of 506 Brent M

Brent M

    Producer

  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:06 AM

Very nice report, Adam.
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#24 of 506 Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 14,639 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:15 AM


Originally Posted by Steve Bragg 

Thos was posted another forum:
"Another example of product confusion is with this HTF review they are providing screen captures which they say came from the DVD yet are at 1540x866 resolution. The 2004 Star Wars DVDs were not that resolution. HTF is sheep-like in falling for all the BS Lucasfilm's spokespeople throw at them."


The images I provide are never identified above as "screen captures"  They are compressed (even further by me) graphical illustrations of the work that was done.  They serve only to illustrate some of the fixes made, and if you look at them you should be able to see the before and after differences.  Not sure how thats sheep-like.  In later parts I'll discuss answers to why no original cuts, why some documentaries were left off and other questions.




I had set my expectations accordingly about the original versions of the film, but going in was still concerned about the overall package.  After seeing it, a lot of work went into this release and it shows.  Just to set expectations in the end, I will be buying this set and I will recommend it to others. Is everyone going to be happy with it? Nope. Some people (Carlo) will decide to vote with their wallet and that is fine.




#25 of 506 none

none

    Auditioning

  • 12 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2011

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:18 AM

Steve Bragg wrote: Thos was posted another forum: "Another example of product confusion is with this HTF review they are providing screen captures which they say came from the DVD yet are at 1540x866 resolution. The 2004 Star Wars DVDs were not that resolution. HTF is sheep-like in falling for all the BS Lucasfilm's spokespeople throw at them."

If you are going to quote someone, please consider adding a link so people can verify what you are quoting is what they actually said. (you've got some extra sentence which you've formatted in such a way that... oh you don't ;aslkdj;oisjds;oixcoijasl care.) http://originaltrilo...TopicPost525632

#26 of 506 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:25 AM

It was short summary of what is said on that entire forum. Not my opinion, their's. That's why I didn't quote them by name. People are called Sheep-like in that forum a lot. I should have clarified better, that's why I just edited the post.

#27 of 506 Nicholas Martin

Nicholas Martin

    Screenwriter

  • 2,683 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:29 AM

The "Bring my shuttle" line change began what was one of, if not the worst change of the original trilogy, of course referring to that whole stop-the-pacing-of-the-sequence-dead inserts of Vader flying to, and landing in, his shuttle using "Return of the Jedi" outtakes. The Greedo thing is a deal-breaker for some, while that sequence (not so much the line, as poor as it is) is the deal-breaker for me. These sets come out on my 30th birthday (Sept 16) but I can honestly say I don't ever see myself buying them. It's editorial changes like that which annoy and ruin these the most for this consumer.

#28 of 506

  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 08:52 AM

Dang!  What a cool event to go to!  I already have my pre-order in!!!



#29 of 506 Kevin EK

Kevin EK

    Screenwriter

  • 2,645 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2003

Posted August 21 2011 - 09:28 AM

Carlo, I haven't seen these discs yet, but I think the answer to your question is clear.


The cuts of Star Wars, Empire and Jedi are the same ones you saw in 2004.   It's clear that Lucasfilm and ILM spent a lot of time working on those transfers to do color correction, glitch fixes and anything else they could do to make the special editions look as good as they could in high definition.  From what I understand about the sound mix, the same applies to the audio end.


Given that these are the cuts on the discs, you'll see the same simultaneous firing by Greedo and Han from 2004, and the same changed sequence of getting Vader back to his Star Destroyer from 1997.   I agree that the latter change really messes with what was a great score cue by John Williams, but if I want to see the version I prefer I can always put on the 2nd disc from the 2006 DVD.


BTW the swapped surround channels were a deliberate choice, but not one Lucasfilm is likely to repeat.  The new mix will not have this problem.


The 8% figure applies only to Phantom Menace.


The comment about HTF being sheep-like is an unfortunate phrase.  Adam is presenting verbatim what he was told by the Lucasfilm people at this promotional event.  We can disagree with their statements or take issue with them, but all Adam has done is take the time to bring their statements to us.  His evaluation of the rest of the material is honest - he's fine with how the menus lay out and with the extras that have been included.  Calling that sheep-like is really going too far for me.  Steve, I understand you were just summarizing what someone on another forum was saying, but I honestly don't agree with that assessment.  People on that forum are coming from a position that would expect Adam to have been hostile at this event and would want him to grill the Lucasfilm people about why Lucas won't do something we know he won't do.   The short answer is that the original theatrical release versions will not be on this set.  The other response likely from Lucasfilm as to why they will not be on this set would be "asked and answered."


I'm looking forward to this set.  I see it as a supplement to the pre-existing 2004 set.  If the original versions were ever to be made available in high definition, I would likely pick them up, but I don't see that happening for quite a long time.


And I appreciate Adam taking the time to both attend this event and to compile the information for us to see here.  This took a full day of his time and I appreciate that he did it.



#30 of 506 Shelldweller

Shelldweller

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2011

Posted August 21 2011 - 09:29 AM

Great report. Can you say whether the US-set will be regionfree. I intend to buy the US version since it looks way better than the european one.

#31 of 506 Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul

  • 38,944 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted August 21 2011 - 09:39 AM



Excellent report.  Looking forward to the updates to come
over the next day(s).


Count me in as VERY disappointed with the artwork in the box.


Was that the best they could do?  Other than that piece of

criticism, I am very optimistic about this release and will have

it in my hands day one.




Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

gallery_269895_23_10043.jpg Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders gallery_269895_23_1316.jpg Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

gallery_269895_23_773.jpg Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive gallery_269895_23_992.jpgClick Here for our complete DVD review archive

gallery_269895_23_7246.jpg Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule gallery_269895_23_3120.jpg Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#32 of 506 dargo

dargo

    Extra

  • 17 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2008

Posted August 21 2011 - 09:56 AM

Thanks for all the hard work and getting this info so we can make a informed decision whether to purchase or not. I do find it troubling that you only got to see one film, I can see no reason for not having all six films playing and allow you to view them as you please. I wait eagerly for the next installment of your report.

#33 of 506 Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 14,639 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted August 21 2011 - 10:48 AM



Originally Posted by Shelldweller 

Great report. Can you say whether the US-set will be regionfree. I intend to buy the US version since it looks way better than the european one.


I will attempt to find out.  Will probably take a couple of days to get an answer.



#34 of 506 Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 14,639 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted August 21 2011 - 10:55 AM




Originally Posted by dargo 

Thanks for all the hard work and getting this info so we can make a informed decision whether to purchase or not.
I do find it troubling that you only got to see one film, I can see no reason for not having all six films playing and allow you to
view them as you please. I wait eagerly for the next installment of your report.


Thanks Dargo.  I wouldn't read too much into that.  It was simply a factor of time and the number of displays in the rooms we were in.  If we had asked to see another film we could have.  There was another instance when one of the prequels was playing, but I didn't discuss as I wasn't actively watching.  In my defense I was too busy talking to Lucasfilm and looking at disc seven Posted Image.  Like I mentioned earlier those of us there made a beeline for the extras discs and only had time to scratch the surface of what they had.




#35 of 506 Shelldweller

Shelldweller

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2011

Posted August 21 2011 - 11:08 AM



I will attempt to find out.  Will probably take a couple of days to get an answer. 

 

Great, thank you!

#36 of 506 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 11:23 AM

The "book" holding the discs looks like it will get worn very quickly.



#37 of 506 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 11:28 AM

Some people insist these transfers have "CRUSHED BLACKS"? Does the HT picture quality enthusiasts all in here agree with that? Is it a somewhat subjective thing? I keep reading posts like GeorgeC's: "These movies have been so butchered and screwed up it's disgusting. Crushed blacks, changed hues, brightened images, loss of detail, recolored lightsabers... It goes on and on. It's like a chef compensating for flavor by continually adding different ingredients, but no matter how hard he tries the desired flavor is unattainable. Eventually he starts over Lucas, just go back to the original sources and rescan them without all this tampering. It's not that hard."

#38 of 506 Bryan Ri

Bryan Ri

    Screenwriter

  • 1,636 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 31 2004

Posted August 21 2011 - 11:38 AM

Thank you Adam for all of your hard work, it makes me very much looking forward to the release! Am I the only one that actually REALLY likes the artwork?...

#39 of 506 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted August 21 2011 - 11:41 AM

I never have bought the films for the artwork, it could be all black and just say STAR WARS SAGA and I would be happy. That being said, I never have understood what they have against using the original posters for at least some of the artwork.

#40 of 506 Scott D S

Scott D S

    Supporting Actor

  • 830 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 23 2000

Posted August 21 2011 - 12:23 PM

Thank you Adam for all of your hard work, it makes me very much looking forward to the release! Am I the only one that actually REALLY likes the artwork?...

I wouldn't say I REALLY like it, but I do like it. :) It's funny... a friend of mine has a young son who's a huge Star Wars fan. As far as the original trilogy is concerned, I don't think that generation of kids knows what the old theatrical artwork looks like!





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Interview

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users