Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Battleship (2012) - starring Taylor Kitsch and Alexander Skarsgard

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#21 of 32 ONLINE   TravisR


    Studio Mogul

  • 23,020 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted May 30 2012 - 06:26 PM

I'm not sure why it's failing at the box office either...
I think part of it is that it's caught in the wake of The Avengers but mostly it's that the movie is based on a board game and people, rightly or wrongly, just think that's too stupid of an idea to pay $12 to see. I'm sure I've said it before but if this movie was called The Battleship That Fought Aliens rather than acknowledging a connection to the game, I think it would have done pretty well.

#22 of 32 OFFLINE   dmiller68


    Supporting Actor

  • 667 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2009

Posted May 30 2012 - 06:37 PM

The funny part of it is that they did a great job incorporating the game into the movie. In fact I thought it was one of the best parts of the movie. The grid system and the alien bullets that looks like pegs.
Equipment: Panasonic TC-P65VT25, Panasonic DMP-BDT100, Pioneer Elite SC-37, TiVo Premiere XL, Limited Edition MW3 XBOX 360s with Kinect, Apple TV
Speakers: Definitive Technology Mythos XTR60 (3), Definitive Technology Mythos XTR20BP (4), Definitive Technology SuperCube II

#23 of 32 OFFLINE   DavidJ



  • 2,683 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 23 2001
  • Real Name:David

Posted May 30 2012 - 08:11 PM

Travis you are not alone in thinking part of it was caused by The Avengers: "The Blockbuster That Ate Hollywood: Why ‘Avengers’ Is Crowding the Box Office" http://thewrap.com/m...struction-41156

#24 of 32 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,240 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted May 30 2012 - 09:51 PM

I guess Hollywood is going to have to cut back on the number of films they release because the "major" players are going to continue to kill off the "other" films. People talk about G.I. JOE being pulled but how much room is there for it (or many others) to make money? If you have THE HUNGER GAMES and then THE AVENGERS then you're still not left with much time because you then have SPIDER MAN and THE DARK KNIGHT RISES to kill off more films. If monster hits are going to take over complete months then studios really need to think about how many big budget titles they put in between them. Again, I'm not an expert on the box office because I really don't think quality has anything to do with it. The board game aspect is what made me decide not to watch this movie but the reviews here changed that. It's funny but I still hear so many people make fun of comic movies and yet they're the ones making all the money at the box office. Board game movies might get looked down on but I do wonder how many younger people even know it's a board game. It's funny but sci-fi is my least favorite genre and I've enjoyed the two biggest bombs among some fans and critics. This film about BATTLE LOS ANGELES. I don't know what that says about me but it's just confusing as hell to see so many negative reviews when I found both films to be fun if dumb whereas a lot of these movies are just dumb without being fun. BATTLESHIP really did remind me of those Hollywood films made during WWII where the pride of patriotism was waived right in your face. I could easily see John Wayne in the Neeson role and a young, heroic MGM guy playing the lead here. The entire film reminded me of something we'd see in the 1940s and perhaps that's why the old crowd I saw the movie with gave it a standing ovation at the end. I don't do that sort of thing but I must admit that I walked out of the theater happy that I wasn't the only one who enjoyed it so much.

#25 of 32 OFFLINE   cineMANIAC



  • 1,987 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2008
  • Real Name:Luis
  • LocationNew York City/San Lorenzo, PR

Posted May 31 2012 - 04:34 AM

It doesn't surprise me that many of the film's fans seem to be people over 30 despite the fact that the producers were obviously targeting the under 24 crowd by casting Rihanna. The movie is, as everybody point out, based on a board game - something today's generation knows nothing about. I think it's safe to say BATTLESHIP will never air on NBC - they don't like old people :D
RIP Roberto Gomez Bolanos.

#26 of 32 OFFLINE   Edwin-S



  • 5,738 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted May 31 2012 - 04:22 PM

Basically more Hollywood recruiting propaganda. At least it was more entertaining than BATTLE:LA. These films never fail to amaze me in that the primitive culture always wins out, even though our own history tells us that the truth is the exact opposite. It also was one of the loudest movies that I have seen in quite some time. The game elements were actually incorporated fairly well. Satisfying as long as a person didn't think too hard. It made more sense than Transformers: Dark of the Moon: barely.
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#27 of 32 ONLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson


  • 5,389 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 01 2012 - 12:48 PM

Saw it yesterday and thought it was passable entertainment much of the time.  The climax was pretty good - absurd but exciting - but much of the rest was borderline idiotic and not fun enough to overcome the massive holes and flaws. And I didn't think they developed the lead character well at all.  One minute he's breaking into convenience stores for burritos and the next he's a Naval officer?  Buh?   They should've made his brother wear a red shirt - his fate was preordained.   Almost nothing about the movie made sense.  Still, it was better than any of the "Transformers" movies!
Colin Jacobson

#28 of 32 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 15,034 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted June 10 2012 - 09:10 PM

Originally Posted by Robert Crawford /t/313436/battleship-2012-starring-taylor-kitsch-and-alexander-skarsgard/60#post_3928919 Yes, there was a post credits scene as I was the only one in my audience that stayed to the very end.  Let's just say that not all of those creatures were accounted for, at least not in Scotland.
I forgot all about this.  I finally got around to seeing it today.  Good popcorn film if you check your brain at the door.  Unfortunately I had to cut out as soon as the credits started as the rest of the family was seeing Madagascar 3 (3D) which they all enjoyed. My wife said it was better than the first two.

#29 of 32 OFFLINE   todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor

  • 6,995 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted June 11 2012 - 09:30 AM

Ugh...I didn't see the after-credit scene. What happened?
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#30 of 32 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 15,034 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted June 11 2012 - 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by todd s /t/313436/battleship-2012-starring-taylor-kitsch-and-alexander-skarsgard/60#post_3937207 Ugh...I didn't see the after-credit scene. What happened?

#31 of 32 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 15,034 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted July 09 2012 - 09:46 AM

Universal just announced the Blu-ray for August.  Ron posted all of the details here: http://www.hometheat...ay#post_3946448

#32 of 32 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 15,034 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted August 30 2012 - 11:44 AM

Kevin just posted his review here: http://www.hometheat...iew-recommended

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users