-

Jump to content



Photo
Blu-ray Reviews

HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: Teen Wolf



This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
20 replies to this topic

#1 of 21 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer

  • 11,266 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted March 30 2011 - 01:47 PM

http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/


Teen Wolf (Blu-ray)
Directed by  Rod Daniel

Studio: MGM
Year: 1985
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1   1080p   AVC codec  
Running Time: 92 minutes
Rating: PG
Audio: DTS-HD Master Audio 2.0 mono English; Dolby Digital 2.0 mono Spanish, French
Subtitles: SDH, Spanish, French


Region:  A
MSRP:  $ 19.99



Release Date: March 29, 2011

Review Date:  March 30, 2011

 

 

The Film

2.5/5

 

Abbott and Costello had lots of fun coming into contact with various Universal monsters in a series of horror farces beginning with Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. Too bad some of that considerable humor and charm couldn’t have been siphoned off for Rod Daniel’s Teen Wolf, a rather tedious werewolf teen comedy whose sole virtue is its star, the young and very talented Michael J. Fox. Everyone and everything else about this feeble comedy is lackluster from the teen pals and the girls he’s friends with to the unimaginative comic set-ups that lead to one of the most predictable and unsatisfying championship basketball games in recent memory.

 

Teen athlete Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox) begins having strange sensations both on and off the basketball court, from a rushing in his ears to heart palpitations, long stray hairs sprouting and disappearing at random, and ears, teeth, and fingernails extending at odd moments. When he finally gets home and looks in his bathroom mirror, he sees himself as a full-fledged werewolf, a little genetic family fact his father (James Hampton), also a werewolf, had neglected to warn him of its possibility. During a basketball game, Scott’s passion about winning prompts his transformation into a full-fledged werewolf, one who miraculously can play basketball like a pro. Instead of being horrified, the fans are overjoyed that they now have a star player who can actually win games for the school, and very quickly Scott becomes the most popular boy on campus. His new popularity, however, doesn’t get him very far with the girl of his dreams Pamela Welles (Lorie Griffin), but gal pal ‘Boof’ (Susan Ursitti) and buddy Stiles (Jerry Levine) remain friends no matter which incarnation Scott chooses to use at school though they, like the rest of the student body, find the wolf persona infinitely cooler than the human one.

 

Joseph Loeb III and Matthew Weisman’s screenplay doesn’t offer any explanation about the origins of the Howard family curse nor do they bother to explain how Scott can turn on and off his werewolf persona either during the day or night. Their romances for Scott are uninvolving as well, not helped by the two mediocre actresses who play the girls (there’s a studly rival at school for the girl Scott’s really interested in, and yet he ends up nonsensically playing on the opposite team for the climactic game). The lengthy set pieces like a beer party or the endless basketball game finale (done in montage) are ploddingly staged by director Rod Daniel who doesn’t seem to have much of a flair for comedy. And the film is sloppily assembled, too. There are continuity gaffes (Fox closes his school locker in one shot and when we go out to a wider angle, the locker is open), and looping of dialogue often doesn’t match at all what the actors’ lips are saying. And the cast is in many ways one of the film’s great liabilities. In fact, the younger cast members (apart from the star) who have to provide a lion’s share of the comedy are rather inept at the physical stuff and don’t have a way with dialogue either. Of course, what they’re given to say is pretty witless, so it’s a lose-lose situation all around for them.

 

But Michael J. Fox, hot off of his big success in Back to the Future, proves that his ease with lines and physical business was no fluke turning in the only truly interesting performance in the movie among the younger actors. His most outstanding moment in the film, however, doesn’t involve the rather dreadful werewolf make-up they’ve caked on him but a much earlier scene when he bolts from his classroom feeling a spell coming over him and skitters down a slippery school hallway on the way to the bathroom. His frantic slipping and sliding body language down endless corridors attempting to find a boys’ restroom is comic gold and the high spot of the movie. Other scenes with him in werewolf regalia ruling the basketball court despite his tiny stature are likewise endearing. Of the adults in the cast, Jay Tarses as the world’s most uninvolved coach is a treat as he dispenses bad advice or worse yet no advice contrary to almost every movie trainer in the history of cinema, a nicely ironic touch in a screenplay that could have used a few more fresh ideas.

 

 

Video Quality

3.5/5

 

The film has been framed at its theatrical 1.85:1 aspect ratio and is presented in 1080p using the AVC codec. Everything about this transfer is fairly good but none of it is outstanding. Color saturation levels are fine, and flesh tones are realistic, but black levels are mediocre. Worse, sharpness is never what it could be, and some shots are very soft as if the focus puller was asleep at the switch. There are dust specks to be seen throughout, but they aren’t a major concern. The film has been divided into 16 chapters.

 

 

Audio Quality

4/5

 

The DTS-HD Master Audio 2.0 mono track is surprisingly full and contains no aural artifacts such as hiss or crackle. There’s very good fidelity, too, with the healthy dose of pop music that dots the soundtrack and some impressive bass in the sound mix. Miles Goodman wrote a score for the film that is less interesting, however. Dialogue is cleanly recorded though the use of ADR is very frequent and quite noticeable and sometimes jarring in its uneasy fit with the direct recordings.

 

 

Special Features

1/5

 

A sneak preview of the new Teen Wolf television series on MTV, coming in 2011, seems to suggest a suspense show rather than a comedy. It runs 2 ¾ minutes in 1080p.

 

The film’s theatrical trailer is in very poor shape, but it is presented in 1080p and runs for 1 ¾ minutes.

 

 

In Conclusion

2.5/5 (not an average)

 

Teen Wolf must have been sold on its title and its star alone because the script is woefully lacking in charm and inventiveness. The Blu-ray release is slightly above average in look and sound with very little in the way of bonus features to recommend the set.

 

 

 

Matt Hough

Charlotte, NC



#2 of 21 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer

  • 14,831 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted March 30 2011 - 03:46 PM

Thanks for the review Matt.



Teen Wolf must have been sold on its title and its star alone because the script is woefully lacking in charm and inventiveness. The Blu-ray release is slightly above average in look and sound with very little in the way of bonus features to recommend the set.


Yes it was. I remember liking this as a teen.  I'm afraid based on your review that this is going to be one of those movies that I look forward to watching again and afterwards wonder what I saw in it when I was a kid.



#3 of 21 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 22,008 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted March 31 2011 - 01:16 AM

Originally Posted by Adam Gregorich 



Yes it was. I remember liking this as a teen.  I'm afraid based on your review that this is going to be one of those movies that I look forward to watching again and afterwards wonder what I saw in it when I was a kid.



You might want to skip rewatching it and just keep your good memories. When I was a little kid and Teen Wolf was on cable in the 1980's, I must have seen it twenty times. Then I saw it again about a year or two ago and saying that it's a terrible movie is being kind.



#4 of 21 OFFLINE   Christian Preischl

Christian Preischl

    Screenwriter

  • 1,376 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2001

Posted March 31 2011 - 01:55 AM

I'm in the same camp as you in that I used to watch it countless times in the 80s. I still get a kick out of it though, despite its obvious flaws.


The same CANNOT be said about Teen Wolf Too. :)



#5 of 21 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer

  • 5,219 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted March 31 2011 - 03:59 AM


The same CANNOT be said about Teen Wolf Too. :)

Saw that one on cable recently. So bad that I was amused by it.


You would think they could have just thrown Too on this BD though.

STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#6 of 21 OFFLINE   orlandomovieguy

orlandomovieguy

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2011

Posted April 01 2011 - 12:07 AM

You guys are way too critical on this film. Most people I know consider Teen Wolf to be a classic 80's comedy and I totally agree with them. This isn't supposed to be Shakespeare people. This is a coming of age teen comedy which shows the awkwardness of that time and trying to fit into high school, not unlike a number of John Hughes movies and Can't Buy Me Love. I am definitely looking forward to Teen Wolf on Blu-ray.



#7 of 21 OFFLINE   lukejosephchung

lukejosephchung

    Screenwriter

  • 1,201 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2007
  • Real Name:Luke J. Chung
  • LocationSan Francisco, CA., USA

Posted April 04 2011 - 10:58 AM

orlandomovieguy...you're the one who's giving way too much credit to "Teen Wolf"...to even compare this with legitimate '80s classics like John Hughes' "The Breakfast Club" or "Pretty In Pink" doesn't work in this case. It's b-movie story and production values are a huge comedown from the heights of Fox's "Back To The Future", which this movie was designed to capitalize on.



#8 of 21 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer

  • 5,235 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted April 04 2011 - 12:06 PM



Originally Posted by lukejosephchung 

orlandomovieguy...you're the one who's giving way too much credit to "Teen Wolf"...to even compare this with legitimate '80s classics like John Hughes' "The Breakfast Club" or "Pretty In Pink" doesn't work in this case. It's b-movie story and production values are a huge comedown from the heights of Fox's "Back To The Future", which this movie was designed to capitalize on.



Actually, "Teen Wolf" was in the can before "BTTF", so it wasn't some quickie shot to get more Fox product out there.  It was RELEASED at when it was released to capitalize on Fox's popularity, but it wasn't shot with that in mind.


And it indeed is pretty awful 80s teen filmmaking.  I think it'd be totally forgotten without its star's fame...


Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#9 of 21 OFFLINE   orlandomovieguy

orlandomovieguy

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2011

Posted April 05 2011 - 07:20 AM

That is the great thing about movies, everyone has their own opinions. I think we will agree to disagree on Teen Wolf. Like I said, aside of a few posts on this site, the overall opinion of this movie I have found over the years has been very positive. I am sure there are a number of movies we would disagree on. As far as production values, the movie did not have an A-type of budget and to be honest, it didn't really need to have one. There are plenty of A-budget movies that are bad movies. Big budgets do not necessarily equate to a good movie. And as was pointed out, the movie was in the can prior to Back to the Future and was released after BTTF was released. BTTF itself was a sleeper hit as Universal did not place alot of faith in that movie.


#10 of 21 OFFLINE   orlandomovieguy

orlandomovieguy

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2011

Posted April 05 2011 - 07:42 AM

Once again, depends on who you talk to. I know more people that love this film than dislike it. So if you dislike it, more power to you. We can agree to disagree on its merits. It is certainly not a forgotten movie, quite to the contrary.


#11 of 21 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer

  • 5,235 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted April 06 2011 - 02:17 AM



Originally Posted by orlandomovieguy 

Once again, depends on who you talk to. I know more people that love this film than dislike it. So if you dislike it, more power to you. We can agree to disagree on its merits. It is certainly not a forgotten movie, quite to the contrary.



I know it's not forgotten - I said I think it WOULD be forgotten if MJF didn't star in it.  Then again, it never would've been a hit in the first place without him...


Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#12 of 21 OFFLINE   orlandomovieguy

orlandomovieguy

    Auditioning

  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2011

Posted April 06 2011 - 08:41 AM

Actually you could say the same thing about Back to the Future if MJF was not in that movie and they had kept Eric Stoltz in the role. You can say that about pretty much any actor with a successful movie. Would Raiders of the Lost Ark been the same with Tom Selleck rather than Harrison Ford?


#13 of 21 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,037 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted April 06 2011 - 08:45 AM

Both Back to the Future and Raiders of the Lost Ark had great, charismatic actors in the lead roles, but they also had a lot of other things going for them.  They might not have been as good, but I'm sure they's still have been remembered and well-regarded with different leading actors.  I'm not sure the same is true for Teen Wolf.


 

 


#14 of 21 OFFLINE   Russell G

Russell G

    Lead Actor

  • 9,901 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted April 11 2011 - 10:08 AM

I still have my sweet Teen Wolf logo T-shirt from when it came out on video! It's a medium, and I'm now XL, but I'm going to wear it and watch this puppy on a movie night with friends I don't like!





#15 of 21 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer

  • 5,235 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted April 11 2011 - 12:13 PM



Originally Posted by orlandomovieguy 

Actually you could say the same thing about Back to the Future if MJF was not in that movie and they had kept Eric Stoltz in the role. You can say that about pretty much any actor with a successful movie. Would Raiders of the Lost Ark been the same with Tom Selleck rather than Harrison Ford?



No, but I don't think they'd be FORGOTTEN, and I suspect they still would've been hits.  Would they have done as well?  Dunno, but it's clear that "Teen Wolf" got an audience largely because of MJF Mania.  "Raiders" and "BTTF" both had great directors and interesting stories.  "Teen Wolf"?  Not so much...


Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#16 of 21 OFFLINE   Bryan^H

Bryan^H

    Screenwriter

  • 2,649 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 2005

Posted April 14 2011 - 05:57 AM

Looks fantastic!  Glad I upgraded.

For those that hate the film....why?

It's an 80's cheeseball.  Never meant for anything more than a few laughs, and a message of being true to yourself.

Where's the harm in that?


And it also has Lorie Griffin:

 http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/


housekeeping 2.jpg

"She always does that, she just wanders away"

 

 

 


#17 of 21 OFFLINE   jra166

jra166

    Extra

  • 15 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2007

Posted November 01 2011 - 05:02 PM

Commentary track available! For those of you who love this movie, and wish it had a commentary track...your wish has come true. Just discovered that Rod Daniel recorded his own track for this and released it online. Brilliant! Hopefully more filmmakers do this, even if the studios won't pay them to. http://www.roddaniel.com/about.html Mp3 can be downloaded at the link above, and it is FREE. Love this blu-ray, flaws and all! Looks exactly like it did when I saw it on the big screen, 3 years ago on Halloween. I think there were 8 people in the audience :D Now with this commentary, I am a very happy camper! Now if we can just get those deleted scenes...

#18 of 21 OFFLINE   Christian Preischl

Christian Preischl

    Screenwriter

  • 1,376 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2001

Posted November 02 2011 - 02:45 AM

Brilliant, thanks!! Will download later today.

#19 of 21 OFFLINE   Paul_Warren

Paul_Warren

    Second Unit

  • 400 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2002
  • Real Name:Paul Warren
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted November 02 2011 - 07:33 PM

Like this movie its a decent enough teen horror considering the ultra low budget. MJF gives a solid early performance. UK does not get until Feb 2012 as this is locked to Region A I will wait until then rather than import. Fox are releasing this for a low budget price of £7.99 which is good value & only $13 on current exchange rates. Shame Sony do not do the same on Fright Night as that's a similar cult movie which has its followers yet Fox of all studios are happy to press this on BD & market for retail in EU & arguably this is a slightly weaker movie than Fright Night!!!

#20 of 21 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer

  • 11,266 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted November 03 2011 - 12:22 AM

I actually think it's a MUCH weaker movie than Fright Night. It may, however, have a greater following due to its star.