-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

MY FAIR LADY. Has Paramount any plans to release this?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
42 replies to this topic

#1 of 43 OFFLINE   CULTMAN1

CULTMAN1

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 179 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 1999

Posted January 18 2011 - 06:47 AM

This acknowledged classic I assume is currently owned by Paramount.


(If only Warner still owned the rights, this would be out by now on Blu)


Therefore does anyone know if there are any plans to release My Fair lady on Blu Ray?


Robert Harris restored this for 70mm back in 1993, so therefore I assume the elements are there to carry out this important release?



#2 of 43 OFFLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 14,231 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted January 18 2011 - 03:54 PM

I don't remember the exact details, but it's my understanding that the rights for this one are quite sorted. IIRC, CBS Films might actually hold the rights right now but I'm not 100 percent on that.




#3 of 43 OFFLINE   Hollywoodaholic

Hollywoodaholic

    Screenwriter

  • 1,298 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 08 2007
  • Real Name:Wayne Carter
  • LocationSomewhere in Florida

Posted January 19 2011 - 01:18 AM

I know that I read somewhere it was coming out this year because I already traded my regular DVD copy a few months ago in anticipation.



#4 of 43 OFFLINE   MatthewA

MatthewA

    Producer

  • 6,225 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted January 19 2011 - 02:57 AM

CBS owns the copyright and has since 1971. Since the Viacom split, Paramount has had a "gentleman's agreement" with CBS to release their stuff. I'm guessing they'll be dipping into the Audrey Hepburn titles soon, as there's no more that they can possibly do with them on DVD.


Enough is enough, Disney. No more evasions or excuses. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray along with the uncut version of Bedknobs and Broomsticks on Blu-ray. I will not support anything your company produces until then.


#5 of 43 OFFLINE   Eerik

Eerik

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 64 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 02 2011

Posted January 22 2011 - 09:36 AM

It seems that Paramount only wants to release one classic title on Blu-ray per year so when there is a discussion forum regarding classic films on Blu-ray or something like that they could defend themselves. Last year it was African Queen and this year it is The Ten Commandments.



#6 of 43 OFFLINE   GMpasqua

GMpasqua

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2010
  • Real Name:Greg

Posted January 22 2011 - 03:42 PM

CBS should just let Warner release it, after all it was Warner who filmed it



#7 of 43 OFFLINE   ahollis

ahollis

    Producer

  • 5,742 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted January 23 2011 - 04:19 AM




Originally Posted by GMpasqua 

CBS should just let Warner release it, after all it was Warner who filmed it



But CBS is the one that owns it.  The poor judgment was with Jack Warner who agreed to a limited ownership of the film.  Even in those days before home video there was some money to be made in television sales and theatrical re-releases.

"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#8 of 43 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Lead Actor

  • 7,512 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted January 23 2011 - 04:29 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by ahollis 

Originally Posted by GMpasqua 

CBS should just let Warner release it, after all it was Warner who filmed it



But CBS is the one that owns it.  The poor judgment was with Jack Warner who agreed to a limited ownership of the film.  Even in those days before home video there was some money to be made in television sales and theatrical re-releases.
Where is this "poor judgment" by Mr. Warner?  He wanted to produce the film, and made the best deal that he could.  He won a Best Picture award for the studio, and decades later the studio made millions from a new license for home video.  The best thing for the film, and toward a continuous and hefty income stream for all concerned, would have been for CBS / Viacom to extend the WB home video license.  Millions more would already have come in.


There is no proper high quality HD master for the film, and  a great deal of work needs to be performed toward a quality Blu-ray release.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#9 of 43 OFFLINE   GMpasqua

GMpasqua

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2010
  • Real Name:Greg

Posted January 23 2011 - 06:10 AM



Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Harris 


There is no proper high quality HD master for the film, and  a great deal of work needs to be performed toward a quality Blu-ray release.


RAH


Warner is very good about working to restore their films for Blu-ray. It would be great if they were to re-new the license.


Mr. Harris - There are better versions of Audrey Hepburns vocals floating around (and for all of the songs) . Could these be re-incorporated into the film as an alternate track?



#10 of 43 OFFLINE   CULTMAN1

CULTMAN1

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 179 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 1999

Posted January 23 2011 - 06:21 AM

Thank you for your informative reply. (we recently went to the BFI national Film Theater to see MFL  and were disappointed by only seeing a 35mm print...slightly muddy..... I was under the impression the ACADEMY SCREEN ARHIVE had a decent 70mm print, but the BFI claimed it was already faded since your restoration in 1993!)


I hope one day Paramoun or whoevert will produce a decent HD Master as I am sure this would sell well on blu ray. A most informative update, thank you. Bruce Campbell



#11 of 43 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Lead Actor

  • 7,512 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted January 23 2011 - 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CULTMAN1 

Thank you for your informative reply. (we recently went to the BFI national Film Theater to see MFL  and were disappointed by only seeing a 35mm print...slightly muddy..... I was under the impression the ACADEMY SCREEN ARHIVE had a decent 70mm print, but the BFI claimed it was already faded since your restoration in 1993!)


I hope one day Paramoun or whoevert will produce a decent HD Master as I am sure this would sell well on blu ray. A most informative update, thank you. Bruce Campbell


You've been misinformed.  1994 prints are not faded, and if they were running a 35 of the restoration, it should have been in no way "muddy."  Sound like low amperage or a problem lamp house, unless it was a pre-1994 print.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#12 of 43 OFFLINE   CULTMAN1

CULTMAN1

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 179 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 1999

Posted January 23 2011 - 09:03 AM

points taken on board...

All I can add was when I was fortunate enough to see the 70mm restoration of MFL at the ABC Shaftsbury Avenue back in 1994 I do remember viewing an exemplary vibrant 70mm print- an absolute joy.


The print shown at the NFT did have the restoration credits at the end so I assume it was struck from  the restored master around then. There were one or two splices where scenes were missing but the sound was tremendous.

BC



#13 of 43 OFFLINE   GMpasqua

GMpasqua

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2010
  • Real Name:Greg

Posted March 01 2011 - 05:08 AM

Don't look for "My Fair Lady" any time soon As reported: CBS Films owning some of the rights but some of these elements will revert to the Lerner & Loewe estate later this year (2010) So Paramount may no longer hold the videio rights through CBS - unless a new deal is reached Plus, SONY is preparing a new film version with possible star Colin Firth

#14 of 43 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Producer

  • 5,264 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted March 01 2011 - 06:26 AM



Originally Posted by GMpasqua 


Plus, SONY is preparing a new film version with possible star Colin Furth

What!  Is this for real?  Boy, talk about a film with a high bar of excellence to achieve to be considered a success.



Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#15 of 43 OFFLINE   Joe Caps

Joe Caps

    Screenwriter

  • 1,933 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2000

Posted March 03 2011 - 01:40 AM


the last I heard, the remake of My Fair Lady will have  Hugh Grant and Carey Mulligan



#16 of 43 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer

  • 11,301 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted March 03 2011 - 03:20 AM

Is Emma Thompson still writing the screenplay?



#17 of 43 OFFLINE   GMpasqua

GMpasqua

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2010
  • Real Name:Greg

Posted March 03 2011 - 04:07 AM




Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Caps 


the last I heard, the remake of My Fair Lady will have  Hugh Grant and Carey Mulligan



That was true until Colin won the Oscar. I hope Grant doesn't do it, he is one actor I never liked and he hasn't a hit in years




#18 of 43 OFFLINE   Brian Borst

Brian Borst

    Screenwriter

  • 1,137 posts
  • Join Date: May 15 2008

Posted March 04 2011 - 05:25 AM

I thought Keira Knightley was supposed to be in the remake? If it speeds up a Blu-ray release, then they can do with that remake what they want. Just let them hurry up, I want the original on Blu-ray Posted Image.


Never go out with anyone who thinks Fellini is a type of cheese

My Blu-Ray/DVD Collection

#19 of 43 OFFLINE   Everett Stallings

Everett Stallings

    Second Unit

  • 386 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 24 1998
  • Real Name:Everett
  • LocationWilmington,De

Posted March 04 2011 - 07:06 AM

Last week TCM showed it & on the end it said it was dist. by some small co. I never heard of. Why don't they remake something that turned out bad,like

Mame? Or one that has not been filmed! No matter how good this remake is it will not be liked. I saw MFL at the McArthur theatre in D.C. in 70mm but got

our money back as the lamp was too old.The manager said it was new. Anyway it was dark. We saw it at the Senator in balto.Md. when they got it. Great

showing as usual!


Former projectionist @ all downtown theatres in Balto. City.Which are all closed. frown.gif

#20 of 43 OFFLINE   GMpasqua

GMpasqua

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2010
  • Real Name:Greg

Posted March 04 2011 - 07:31 AM

Remember when they remade "The King and I" - as a cartoon.

Remakes of classic films usually don't make of an impact