Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

A&E Press Release: The World At War (Blu-ray)


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 of 5 OFFLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 42,988 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted October 22 2010 - 09:52 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image


 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#2 of 5 OFFLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 42,988 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted October 22 2010 - 09:53 AM

Have watched many WWII documentaries including Ken Burns THE WAR and WWII in COLOR. This is supposed to be the grandaddy of all WWII documentaries and I have always wanted to see it. However, looking over at Amazon (see link) there seems to be an uproar about the aspect ratio that I am guessing is being proposed for this release.

 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#3 of 5 OFFLINE   Steve Tannehill

Steve Tannehill

    Producer



  • 5,550 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 1997
  • Real Name:Steve Tannehill
  • LocationDFW

Posted October 22 2010 - 10:10 AM

The Horrors, The Horrors!



To crop or not
Some controversy surrounds the release though following the news that it had been decided to crop the original 4:3 visuals to 16:9. As Fremantle's Anthony Thomas revealed, this was the result of not only numerous comparative tests, but also commercial pressures such as the fact that when it comes to worldwide broadcast rights, 'there simply aren't any HD TV channels that are willing to consider 4:3 material. However, it's worth pointing out that all of the grading and restoration was done to the original 4:3 material, before it was cropped to 16:9. So, if for some reason we ever need it, we do have the restored version in its original aspect ratio'.


While purists will undoubtedly moan, the new framing has the approval of series' producer Jeremy Isaacs and supervising editor Alan Afriat. And as Glaridis is keen to point out, 'it's not an automated process - we're adjusting the image manually, moving it up and down, left and right to ensure that the focus remains on the most important part of the image. You are going from 4:3 to 16:9 so, unavoidably, you do lose a little of the original image. But back when all of this material was shot, even then it was pretty much on the fine line, there weren't many rules going on with framing anyway. So while some people might look at the 16:9 version and think that it's cropping a little head and that, if you go back to the original, it's often shot like that anyway, or it's blurred, and it's like "No, no, this is how it is anyway". Hopefully it won't be judged that much because if you did go back and compare it's really not far off from the original'.


From: http://hcc.techradar...lu-ray-12-08-10



#4 of 5 OFFLINE   James Luckard

James Luckard

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 210 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2003

Posted October 22 2010 - 01:34 PM



back when all of this material was shot, even then it was pretty much on the fine line, there weren't many rules going on with framing anyway. So while some people might look at the 16:9 version and think that it's cropping a little head and that, if you go back to the original, it's often shot like that anyway, or it's blurred, and it's like "No, no, this is how it is anyway". Hopefully it won't be judged that much because if you did go back and compare it's really not far off from the original'.



Wow! Officially the most scattered, desperate, incoherent explanation I've ever seen for cropping.


At least it starts off honest, saying it's all about selling it for foreign distribution in HD.


But then it devolves into this gibberish, which makes Vittorio Storaro's "Univisium" nonsense seem lucid in comparison.



#5 of 5 OFFLINE   James Luckard

James Luckard

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 210 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 21 2003

Posted October 22 2010 - 01:36 PM

One of my favorite TV films ever, the Aussie miniseries BANGKOK HILTON starring Nicole Kidman, was also cropped from 4:3 to 16:9 for the most recent DVD, as was the series VIETNAM that she was in. I have a horrible feeling that while classic films like Casablanca and Citizen Kane will be safe, old television shows will all soon be cropped.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users