Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Die Hard 5 in the works


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
132 replies to this topic

#1 of 133 OFFLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,542 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted June 13 2010 - 05:59 AM

I was surprised to read this on wikipedia. Excuse me if this has already been discussed. I did a search and didn't find anything.


I was watching Live Free or Die Hard last night. Hadn't seen it in a while. And I found it interesting how so many elements from past films are used here or subtly been incorporated. So I did a search on wikipedia to see the writing and producer credits and I found a entry about Die Hard 5.


So far, they say Bruce Willis is going to star and it will be called Die Hard 24/7. I knew Bruce was really excited about Live Free or Die Hard and doesn't usually really praise a film he's in in case it bombs and comes back to haunt him. But he was really happy with the last film. So I am not totally surprised he's in for a fifth one.


I just hope they do a good job with a storyline.


What I liked about the 4th film is how they replace Holly with Lucy, essentially and this gives John his focus. I liked how the bad guy has his computer geek guy like Hans Gruber did with Theo. This bad guy reminded me more of Simon. The cops here are like the cops in Die Hard with a Vengeance. They are not stupid. Though I like how McTiernan didn't make all the cops stupid in the first film, just the right ones were stupid and the right ones were smart cops.


http://www.aintitcool.com/node/45415




#2 of 133 OFFLINE   Mike Frezon

Mike Frezon

    Studio Mogul



  • 30,178 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 09 2001
  • LocationRensselaer, NY

Posted June 13 2010 - 06:18 AM

As far as I'm concerned...that's great news.  I loved what they did with DH4.  And, I think Willis is a very charismatic screen presence.

There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself.Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!


HTF Rules | HTF Mission Statement | Father of the Bride

Dieting with my Dog & Heart to Heart/Hand in Paw by Peggy Frezon


#3 of 133 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer



  • 11,676 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • LocationVermont

Posted June 13 2010 - 10:38 AM

I agree. DH4 was an exciting film and I thought it was the best in the series since the first. I just wish it were coming out now so there'd be a reason to go to the theater this summer.


The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#4 of 133 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,297 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted June 13 2010 - 11:44 AM

I don't mean to threadcrap, but I'm *really* getting tired of the endless "reboots/reimaginings/rehashes" and the pointless sequels. Die Hard 24/7? How completely boring.


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#5 of 133 OFFLINE   Mike Frezon

Mike Frezon

    Studio Mogul



  • 30,178 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 09 2001
  • LocationRensselaer, NY

Posted June 13 2010 - 01:02 PM



Originally Posted by dpippel 

I don't meant the threadcrap...


Too late, Doug!  /img/vbsmilies/htf/laugh.gif




There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself.Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!


HTF Rules | HTF Mission Statement | Father of the Bride

Dieting with my Dog & Heart to Heart/Hand in Paw by Peggy Frezon


#6 of 133 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,297 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted June 13 2010 - 01:05 PM

"I don't meant the threadcrap..." /img/vbsmilies/htf/laugh.gif Guess I should proofread my threadcrapping a little more carefully before I apologize for it! HAHAHA!!!


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#7 of 133 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,711 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted June 13 2010 - 06:08 PM

Wait 'til #6, Die Hard in a 7/11.


"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#8 of 133 OFFLINE   Paul D G

Paul D G

    Screenwriter



  • 1,621 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 24 2001

Posted June 13 2010 - 07:32 PM

I heard something about this a few months ago.  Just found this (and, honestly, it's the first thing I thought of when I saw the title):

http://www.denofgeek..._crossover.html


Rumours suggest that Die Hard 5 could star Bruce Willis and Kiefer Sutherland. And just what until you see what it might be called...

Published on Jun 11, 2010

The Hollywood rumour mill throws out some bizarre stories on occasions. Over the last day or two, an unnamed source told Aint It Cool News that the title for the fifth John McClane action saga would be, oddly, Die Hard 24/7.

The story goes that Bruce Willis was so inspired by Sylvester Stallone's The Expendables ("He went gaga for it," Sly reportedly said), that it has encouraged him to press on with a new Die Hard film with the harder edge of the earlier trilogy.

Now, further rumours have surfaced that Fox was considering making a John McClane/Jack Bauer crossover adventure, which explains the thinking process behind the curious/shit Die Hard 24/7 title.

It's a plausible story, and the thought of seeing Bauer and McClane's characters teaming up for a joint adventure is an appealing one, but is there any truth to behind the rumours? Only time will tell. More news on this as we get it.



#9 of 133 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,944 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted June 14 2010 - 04:25 AM

Hey, Clint Eastwood made his fifth Dirty Harry movie when he was 58, so Willis still has time to make more McClane movies if he wants 'em.



#10 of 133 OFFLINE   Greg Kettell

Greg Kettell

    Screenwriter



  • 1,187 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1998
  • Real Name:Greg K.
  • LocationNY Capital Region

Posted June 14 2010 - 05:46 AM

A Die Hard/24 crossover just sounds like an exceedingly bad idea.



#11 of 133 OFFLINE   cineMANIAC

cineMANIAC

    Screenwriter



  • 1,928 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2008
  • Real Name:Luis
  • LocationNew York City

Posted June 14 2010 - 06:30 AM




Originally Posted by Malcolm R 

I agree. DH4 was an exciting film and I thought it was the best in the series since the first. I just wish it were coming out now so there'd be a reason to go to the theater this summer.



I thought I was the only one who doesn't think there's much to see this season. In previous years it seemed like there was a major film opening every week. The last film I saw theatrically was Iron Man 2. A fifth Die Hard would be welcome in my book, especially if they bring Holly back in a story that would bring the series full circle and end it for good.


 

RIP Roberto Gomez Bolanos. 


#12 of 133 OFFLINE   Jerome Grate

Jerome Grate

    Screenwriter



  • 2,935 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 1999

Posted June 14 2010 - 08:50 AM

Die Hard 5, I'm with it, 24/7 with Jack Bauer, not so sure.  Too much for me I think.  How do you focus on a character, John McClane or Jack Bauer.  That's like putting Terminator and Rambo in the same movie.  Two major characters, you can't focus but one thing for sure, things are going to blow up and people are going to die.

Listen Up People.., Rack Em and Pack Em.., We're Phantoms in 15.

#13 of 133 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 22,316 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted June 14 2010 - 09:11 AM

^ That's exactly why there's no chance of it happening. Fox isn't going to turn either series into a joke which is usually the result of doing a crossover. They want to turn 24 into a movie franchise and a crossover is what you do at the end of the road- not when you want to get a movie series started. From Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man to Freedy Vs. Jason to Alien Vs. Predator, the crossover concept usually just reeks of "We're even out of ideas for sequels so we'll just combine both characters and fans will still pay money".



#14 of 133 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,261 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 14 2010 - 12:07 PM



Originally Posted by dpippel 

I don't mean to threadcrap, but I'm *really* getting tired of the endless "reboots/reimaginings/rehashes" and the pointless sequels. Die Hard 24/7? How completely boring.



So don't go see it...


Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#15 of 133 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,297 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted June 14 2010 - 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Colin Jacobson 

So don't go see it...


I don't plan to. Is this the Die Hard 5 appreciation thread? Excuse me for expressing an opinion.


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#16 of 133 OFFLINE   Paul D G

Paul D G

    Screenwriter



  • 1,621 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 24 2001

Posted June 14 2010 - 08:15 PM

Upon further investigation the McClaine/Bauer crossover idea has already been debunked.



#17 of 133 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,944 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted June 15 2010 - 12:35 AM



Originally Posted by Luisito34 

I thought I was the only one who doesn't think there's much to see this season. In previous years it seemed like there was a major film opening every week. The last film I saw theatrically was Iron Man 2. A fifth Die Hard would be welcome in my book, especially if they bring Holly back in a story that would bring the series full circle and end it for good.


I think we are seeing the results of the 2008 writers' strike this season.



#18 of 133 ONLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer



  • 5,230 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted June 15 2010 - 02:10 AM


 that it has encouraged him to press on with a new Die Hard film with the harder edge of the earlier trilogy


I hope this means abandoning the PG-13 rating.


STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#19 of 133 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer



  • 3,043 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted June 15 2010 - 05:01 AM



Originally Posted by dpippel 

I don't mean to threadcrap, but I'm *really* getting tired of the endless "reboots/reimaginings/rehashes" and the pointless sequels. Die Hard 24/7? How completely boring.


How do you know it's "boring"?  It doesn't even have a script yet!


 

 


#20 of 133 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,711 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted June 15 2010 - 05:08 AM

I wonder where they can go with this series already? The fourth one really wasn't very good. Sometimes the film just felt like a parody of the series as a whole. The major action set piece was laughable.


That business with the truck trying to climb up the collapsed part of the freeway looked like it belonged in a Wile E. Coyote cartoon. I almost expected the roadrunner to show up and go "beep beep" as McClaine's truck started sliding down the slope. If that wasn't enough, they upped the ante by having a supposedly professional fighter pilot position his multi-million dollar jet in a position that allowed a bunch of junk to fall into the engine just so they could get a "money shot" of the jet going down. McClaine was trapped. All the pilot had to do was go up twenty feet and basically rip him apart with the chain gun
 The writers had written McClaine into a corner that he couldn't logically get out of, so they had to resort to making the pilot stupid. The "Die Hard" films aren't any paragons of reality but what occurred in DH4's major action set piece was just bad writing. It was the Die Hard equivalent of Fonzie jumping the shark in Happy Days. At least, IMO.


So, what can they do in #5 to redeem this series or is the concept just played out as #4 seemed to suggest?

"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users