What's new

The Lightroom 3 beta 1 was meh but beta 2 is AWESOME SAUCE (1 Viewer)

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
Check out these changes:
http://www.computer-darkroom.com/lr3_beta_2_preview/lr3-beta2-1.htm
http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2010/archives/9165
http://lightroomers.com/my-take-on-lightroom-3-beta-2-2/924/

Wow look at that noise reduction. If you take a lot of low light shots (and I do, which is why I want a D3s =) hehe) this is a pretty incredible bump and reduces or removes the need for a dedicated noise tool almost completely. Sharpening likewise gets a nice bump. Add in perspective lens correction and they will have this trifecta locked up.

Adding in an initial cut on video handling is more a annoucement that 'this is in our future big time' rather than a comprehensive suite of video tools in this cut, but it's a bold statement!

Sam
 

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,865
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
Do all the different Adobe products (Photoshop, Lightroom, Elements) use the same Adobe Camera Raw processing engine? I only have Elements, and find that I use Canon's own Digital Photo Professional application instead for the vast majority of my post processing, preferring the results I get in Raw conversion with it over Elements. It also offers lens correction for most Canon lenses. The one area DPP lacks in, though, is noise reduction.
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
Essentially yes, but there were major improvements to the rendering engine over the last few updates and big big changes today.

I have tried DPP. It is a UI disaster, regardless of the results =) Nikon's in house app is even worse tho.
 

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,865
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
I have the latest version of Elements (version 8), so I should have a pretty recent version of ACR. While the user interface for DPP may not be stellar, it works fine for the basics required to post process raw files, and that is all I need most of the time.
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
OK, now that CS5 is official, watch this and tell me you are still satisfied:
http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/03/caf_in_ps.html

And then these
http://cs5launch.adobe.com/

=)

Also, this video partly explains how ACR has evolved from 2003 to 2010:
http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/03/video_whats_new_in_lr3_beta_2.html

More details on that to come.

More on Lr3:
http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/4906#more-4906
 

Jon_Are

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2001
Messages
2,036
Sam and Scott -

When I heard CS5 was looming, I said, naw, I'm totally happy with CS4.

Then I ran across that same video demonstrating Content-Aware fill.

Damn! I gotta get me some of that!

(still not sold that I need LR3, though)
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
If you are happy with bridge and CS stick with it. I love that LR let's me do all of what I want to do with my photos quickly and elegantly tho, it's a matter of mindset more than capability now...
 

DavidJ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2001
Messages
4,365
Real Name
David
Jon, are you currently using Lightroom? I wasn't sure what to think about it, but kept hearing good things about it and decided to give it a try. I love it and am looking forward to the improvements in version 3. I believe you can download a trial version. I'd suggest giving it a try. And the content-aware fill in PS CS5 is amazing.
 

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,865
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
The content-aware fill and noise reduction do look impressive. Not being a person who does a lot of image manipulation, though, I'm wondering if it's worth the cost?

A tool I could really use would be something for easily creating HDR images. How is Lightroom for this? Elements was very tedious the couple of times I tried the technique. Would getting a tool dedicated to this function be a better way to go?
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Merryfield

A tool I could really use would be something for easily creating HDR images. How is Lightroom for this? Elements was very tedious the couple of times I tried the technique. Would getting a tool dedicated to this function be a better way to go?
There are no real specific tools for HDR or Panos built into Lr, you are expected to round trip to Photoshop for those. Wouldn't surprise me to see Panos, HDR and lens correction being the big features for LR4. After those (and maybe softproofing) are in I have no idea what they will focus on, it will have to be the esoteric techy stuff because they simply have outdone themselves so far at the core idea of what Lr is all about. How can they continue to add more real functionality without it looking like bloat?

Look at Kelby's wish list:
http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/932

How much of that hasn't been accomplished? Not much I'd say.
 

DavidJ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2001
Messages
4,365
Real Name
David
Originally Posted by Scott Merryfield

The content-aware fill and noise reduction do look impressive. Not being a person who does a lot of image manipulation, though, I'm wondering if it's worth the cost?

A tool I could really use would be something for easily creating HDR images. How is Lightroom for this? Elements was very tedious the couple of times I tried the technique. Would getting a tool dedicated to this function be a better way to go?
For HDR, you'll find a lot of recommendations for Photomatix Pro from HDRsoft (http://www.hdrsoft.com/). It is easy to use and works well--- much better than Photoshop's Merge to HDR.
 

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,865
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
Originally Posted by DavidJ




For HDR, you'll find a lot of recommendations for Photomatix Pro from HDRsoft (http://www.hdrsoft.com/). It is easy to use and works well--- much better than Photoshop's Merge to HDR.
David,

I have heard good things about Photomatix elsewhere, too. When I have some time, I need to download a trial version of the program and check it out.
 

DavidJ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2001
Messages
4,365
Real Name
David
Originally Posted by Sam Posten

I dislike all but the most subtle of HDR so not much help there other than I've heard good things about photomatix too
I'm not a big fan of the surrealistic style either. Well, I do appreciate the art behind them, but it is not my type of photography. I do like HDR for the fact that it allows you to do a better job of capturing and representing the range that the eye can see.
 

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,865
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
Originally Posted by DavidJ




I'm not a big fan of the surrealistic style either. Well, I do appreciate the art behind them, but it is not my type of photography. I do like HDR for the fact that it allows you to do a better job of capturing and representing the range that the eye can see.
That's all I am looking for in HDR -- for those shots where the dynamic range is just too great to capture with a single exposure. I've started experimenting with split ND filters, too, but those only work where you have a fairly straight line transitioning light to dark.
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
I'm all for that. I think the Trey Ratcliffe stuff is a bit too much tho. He's an excellent communicator but I just don't dig his style.
http://www.stuckincustoms.com/

If you are into HDR he's got some tutorials on it, linked top right on that page.
 

Sam Posten

Moderator
Premium
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 30, 1997
Messages
33,674
Location
Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
Real Name
Sam Posten
CS5 just shipped, you can go get a FULLY FUNCTIONAL 30 day trial, no more half assed trials of Premiere!, at www.adobe.com

I'm currently downloading all 9GB of CS5 Production Premium =)
 

TonyD

Who do we think I am?
Ambassador
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 1, 1999
Messages
24,249
Location
Gulf Coast
Real Name
Tony D.
Well I seem to have won a copy of [SIZE= 14px]Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 from a contest I barely remember entering.[/SIZE]

[SIZE= 14px]Got an email a few weeks ago asking for my shipping address.[/SIZE]

[SIZE= 14px]Seemed a little shady but gave it to them anyway, and today the package came in the mail.[/SIZE]

[SIZE= 14px]Hmm.[/SIZE]


[SIZE= 14px]Anyone remember a contest anytime in the last few months for this, I have a vague memory of something....[/SIZE]


[SIZE= 14px]Btw, I'm not really sure what I'd use it for since I'm not much of a photog.[/SIZE]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top