Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

What Blu-ray discs do you consider as "Reference Video Quality"


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
64 replies to this topic

#1 of 65 OFFLINE   lenlaw

lenlaw

    Auditioning



  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2009

Posted August 13 2009 - 02:57 AM

A few come to mind: The Dark Knight, Coraline, Wall.E.


#2 of 65 OFFLINE   Michael Reuben

Michael Reuben

    Studio Mogul



  • 21,769 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 12 1998

Posted August 13 2009 - 03:16 AM

Moved from High Def Disc Review Archives, which is the archive for HTF disc reviews.


COMPLETE list of my disc reviews.       HTF Rules / 200920102011 Film Lists

#3 of 65 OFFLINE   Frank Ha

Frank Ha

    Second Unit



  • 353 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 21 2003
  • Real Name:Frank Harrison
  • LocationLand of mole, tlayudas and chapulines

Posted August 13 2009 - 03:34 AM

There are several, but I'll limit myself to movies I've recently viewed.  Pinocchio comes to mind.  My wife and I marveled at how good it looked.  Spiderman 2 looked real good the other night when we watched it.  Also, Dr. No and From Russia with Love have great transfers, imo.
 

"And in the end, the only thing you really own is... your story.  Just trying to live a good one" - The Drover 

#4 of 65 OFFLINE   Ray_R

Ray_R

    Screenwriter



  • 1,559 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 22 2004

Posted August 13 2009 - 04:39 AM

I take it this should be a thread for titles which keep their original theatrical look? Perhaps The French Connection doesn't apply but I'm not sure if it does or doesn't.
I'll put up a nomination for ALL OO7 films I own on Blu-ray so far. Can't wait for the remaining 9 out of 20 to be released. Only problem is what do I do with the 4 Volume Ultimate Edition R1 NTSC releases which I bought? I want to keep the booklets...


#5 of 65 OFFLINE   EricW

EricW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted August 14 2009 - 11:09 AM

i'm guessing this thread will eventually get locked when debate gets too heated :P 

anyways, Dark Knight is hardly reference.  sharp and detailed, yes.  edge enhanced, YES. 

also add Benjamin Button to the list of references discs, as well as most movies shot with digital cameras.  although Superman Returns was a bit soft.

"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#6 of 65 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Lead Actor



  • 7,606 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted August 14 2009 - 01:23 PM

Several years ago, with some help from others in AMIA, I attempted to come to a consensus as to what precisely was "film restoration."

There was no agreement.

Before a list of titles comes into play, you must come to an agreement as to the words "reference quality."

RAH

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#7 of 65 OFFLINE   Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor



  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted August 14 2009 - 01:42 PM



Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Harris View Post

Before a list of titles comes into play, you must come to an agreement as to the words "reference quality."

 
I take reference to mean 'maintaining the highest fidelity to the source'.
But I recognize that is NOT what most people who use to the term mean consider it to be.
And even the way I use it is a bit obtuse. I could further qualify it as 'highest fidelity to the original theatrical presentation' which might be better but still leaves room for further contention over various exceptions to the rule.

It seems that most people who use that term invariably mean something that is bright, sharp, finely detailed, and punchy (dimensional). Which of course means a great many films will be disqualified no matter how faithfully they replicate their OTP.

That's why I look down my nose at "tier" threads. 

I'm in the minority here I realize, but there are several Bond Bds that I don't feel are ideal because, while they look pretty, they exhibit too much in the way of 2000 era sensibilities as regard to their gamma curves and the color saturation. Moonraker and License To Kill in particular strike me as looking very manipulated- with crushed blacks in the case of the former and jacked contrast and color saturation in the latter. I'm not a big fan of this current fashion, and when it gets applied to catalog titles it really rubs me the wrong way.

#8 of 65 OFFLINE   Stephen_J_H

Stephen_J_H

    Producer



  • 4,077 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen J. Hill
  • LocationNorth of the 49th

Posted August 14 2009 - 03:52 PM

How the West Was Won. Start there, and build your own list of reference discs. Your eyes will tell you the truth.

"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player."-- Roger Ebert

#9 of 65 OFFLINE   Ray_R

Ray_R

    Screenwriter



  • 1,559 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 22 2004

Posted August 14 2009 - 03:59 PM

I'll agree with Pauls sentiment. To me the best transfers keep the original look of the film, whether it be soft focus, heavy grain, washed out colour pallette and even different looks for differing scenes.
If I ever were a director and made a movie, I'd have different locales look different compared to each other. Possibly heavier film grain for dark jungle scenes or slightly washed out colours for cities. Sort of in the style of Spy Game. But of course if I were a director, a dream project of mine would be THE FLASH. With highly stylised colours and differing film grain stock as the film goes on.
I'd never use DNR/EE or digital tape if I ever made movies.
Do titles from other Regions count? Such as the USA BD of Pan's Labyrinth has DNR while the AUS, I think or UK, has the film grain intact. Case in point, one of my most hated transfers on DVD was DIE HARD: With a Vengeance. The DNR/EE was so bad I just had the commentary go on but the display turned off on purpose.
I can't wait for FIGHT CLUB (November 17th according to Amazon) and Saving Private Ryan (Sapphire Series Wave 2?) to be on Blu-ray. I'd love it if both retain their stylised heavy grain structure and color pallettes. Alot of persons who are against original look for films and prefer DNR/EE for that pasty, waxy look would have a field day with the two.
I'm glad I have my noise reduction filter on my display disabled. And black bars? I pay attention to the movie.
Although I own these on HDDVD and quite sure the Blu-ray is nearly similar, I'd nominate:
12 Monkeys
The Adventures of Robin Hood
BLADE RUNNER
KING KONG (2005)


#10 of 65 OFFLINE   Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Executive Producer



  • 11,620 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted August 15 2009 - 02:03 AM

The best transfer I've seen this year so far has been SIN CITY. That was breathtaking.

#11 of 65 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Lead Actor



  • 7,606 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted August 15 2009 - 04:14 AM

There should also be a differentiation between ports, down-rezzed files from data and transfers.

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#12 of 65 OFFLINE   Mark Walker

Mark Walker

    Screenwriter



  • 2,618 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 1999

Posted August 16 2009 - 05:53 AM

This far into this thread and no one has mentioned BARAKA!?!?!?!

To quote Bill Hunt at TheDigitalBits, "...Quite simply, is the best looking live action Blu-ray release I have EVER seen."

And this isn't some old review before the format had quality discs out.


Paramount, please release DRAGONSLAYER on Blu-ray

Dragonslayer_1981HTF_zps4e370848.jpg

 

 

Vermithrax Pejorative deserves to be seen in high-def.


#13 of 65 OFFLINE   Ray_R

Ray_R

    Screenwriter



  • 1,559 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 22 2004

Posted August 16 2009 - 11:51 AM



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Walker 

This far into this thread and no one has mentioned BARAKA!?!?!?!

To quote Bill Hunt at TheDigitalBits, "...Quite simply, is the best looking live action Blu-ray release I have EVER seen."

And this isn't some old review before the format had quality discs out.

I don't go by anything what The Digital Bits says.

And THE DARK KNIGHT being reference quality only pertains to the IMAX scenes. The 35MM ones were DNR'd. Thanks Warner Bros. I was even considering purchasing BATMAN (1989) but read it has DNR too. Might as well get the UK release along with BATMAN RETURNS.
So, no titles which have DNR/EE if they were derived from a film source. Completely digital I really don't care.
Another reference quality which retains the film look is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. What isn't reference quality is the Skynet Edition of T2.



#14 of 65 OFFLINE   Big Ben

Big Ben

    Agent



  • 26 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 23 2009

Posted August 16 2009 - 03:57 PM

Of all the Blu-Ray's that I own these are my favorite Video Transfers, keep in mind that I feel these transfers best replicate the appearance the film had during their theatrical presentations and are not limited to big-budget action spectacles.

Batman Begins
Any Pixar title currently availible
National Treasure 1 & 2
The Fast & the Furious 1, 3, & 4
Casino Royale
Hellboy I & II
Constantine
Leatherheads
Children of Men
Knocked Up
The Hulk (2003)
The Incredible Hulk (2008)
30 Days of Night
Primeval
Kung Fu Panda
Iron Man
Sunshine (2007)
V for Vendetta
The Prestige
Surf's Up
Zodiac
Coraline
Max Payne
Body Of Lies
The International
Quantum of Solace


There are still over a dozen titles I've purchased that I have yet to watch, but these titles listed above looked glorious on my 52 inch Sharp Aquos.
"After Fight Club, watching football on television will feel like watching pornography when you could be having great sex." - Jack the Narrator
 

#15 of 65 OFFLINE   Vincent_P

Vincent_P

    Screenwriter



  • 1,748 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted August 17 2009 - 11:06 AM


Many folks at another website consider BARAKA to be ridden with EE and DNRed/"filtered" to boot...

I think the Blu-ray is stunning myself.

I'd also vote for HOW THE WEST WAS WON and THE SEARCHERS, two large-format classics that look ravishing on Blu-ray.

The fully-digital SIN CITY also looks incredible, and as for recent 35mm/DI sourced films, you can scarcely get better than THE INCREDIBLE HULK (anamorphic 35mm) or TROPIC THUNDER (Super-35mm).  They are both very film-like and detailed in appearance.

Vincent
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Walker ">

This far into this thread and no one has mentioned BARAKA!?!?!?!

To quote Bill Hunt at TheDigitalBits, " is the best looking live action Blu-ray release I have EVER seen."

And this isn't some old review before the format had quality discs out.



Edited by Vincent_P - 8/17/2009 at 11:19 pm GMT
Edited by Vincent_P - 8/18/2009 at 03:55 am GMT
Edited by Vincent_P - 8/18/2009 at 03:56 am GMT

#16 of 65 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,947 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted August 18 2009 - 12:23 AM

I don't have a definition of reference quality, but I certainly think that films like Dr. No and From Russia With Love have never looked better to the human eye -- not unless you were present when they were filmed and had better than 20/20 vision. For films that are nearly 50 years old to look this good is a testament to the brilliant technology that is Blu-Ray.

Many recent films also look sharper on BD than they did when I saw them in the theater. When an eventual release of Revenge of the Sith pops up, I suspect it will blow people's minds, as the DVD is quite good. 


#17 of 65 OFFLINE   Brian Borst

Brian Borst

    Screenwriter



  • 1,137 posts
  • Join Date: May 15 2008

Posted August 25 2009 - 08:47 AM



Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_P 


Many folks at another website consider BARAKA to be ridden with EE and DNRed/"filtered" to boot...

I think the Blu-ray is stunning myself.
I read that too, but it doesn't seem likely. Why go through all the effort and money to do an 8K scan to scrub out all the detail in the picture?

Never go out with anyone who thinks Fellini is a type of cheese

My Blu-Ray/DVD Collection

#18 of 65 OFFLINE   ManW_TheUncool

ManW_TheUncool

    Producer



  • 5,874 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 18 2001
  • Real Name:ManW

Posted August 25 2009 - 09:32 AM

Baraka looks excellent on my 61" DLP from just about any viewing distance (though I didn't actively try to look for defects in PQ).  It's actually one of a small handful of BDs that makes me want to get much closer to the screen to soak it all in.

If it has any EE, it's probably just a mild tweak (to get a tad bit more of that Discovery Channel look).  It's certainly not quite like The Dark Knight in that regard -- TDK definitely looks a bit overcooked in many places though I'm not sure that's not partially intentional (for a more gritty look to suit the film itself).

_Man_


Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

"Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things..." (St. Paul)

#19 of 65 OFFLINE   EricW

EricW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted August 25 2009 - 11:57 AM


Quote:
I read that too, but it doesn't seem likely. Why go through all the effort and money to do an 8K scan to scrub out all the detail in the picture?

i don't know, but saying that 'it doesn't make sense' doesn't change what my eyes see.  whether it was applied or not, there is obvious halo'ing in Baraka.  questioning the logic of why it would be there doesn't change the fact that it's there.

"Reference" is a volatile word.  do you mean "looks exactly like the way it was in the theater" or do you mean "something i can show off the system with"?  because if it's the former, a movie could look blurry, dark, and muddled and still be considered 'reference'. 




"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#20 of 65 OFFLINE   Gekkou

Gekkou

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 102 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 01 2006

Posted August 25 2009 - 02:11 PM

I agree wholeheartedly with Paul_Scott; I consider reference quality to be as close to the original source as the format will allow, whether demo material or not.  I also find that at this stage of the format's life, most new DI-based films from the major studios come out looking that way.  It's to the point where I hesitate to use the term out of concern that it might lose its meaning.  I mean, if every week or so we get another Blu-ray disc that qualifies as "reference quality," then it ceases to be a real special honor.  I suppose that's a good thing, though.  Even though to this day there are still too many films- mainly catalogue titles- that get molested with DNR, EE, and other revisionist post-processing, I think that new releases tend to be excellent in terms of technical quality.

The main obstacle is getting studios to strike fresh masters for films that need it rather than trying to dress up the outdated ones.  Garbage in, garbage out.

That being said, I can think of some titles offhand that struck me as being perfectly presented on video (in no particular order):
Quantum of Solace
Coraline
Sin City
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Apocalypto
WALL-E
Ratatouille
Iron Man
'Pirates of the Caribbean' trilogy
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Zodiac (though I have the HD DVD, not the Blu-ray)
Seabiscuit (see above)
Rescue Dawn
Taken
Wanted
Die Hard