Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Premium glasses for 3D movies?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 of 18 OFFLINE   Kenneth Harden

Kenneth Harden

    Screenwriter



  • 1,365 posts
  • Join Date: May 13 2002

Posted February 16 2009 - 05:48 PM

With the (seeming) rise in popularity of 3D movies, assuming they have the same standard across all theaters, is there a market for premium 3D glasses? While you will probably end up paying extra no matter what, it would be nice to have a pair of 'studio' grade glasses to use when watching these movies, as opposed to the cheap junk ones you get. I assume there are high-end ones they use when making the movie? Thoughts?

#2 of 18 OFFLINE   Eric Peterson

Eric Peterson

    Screenwriter



  • 2,959 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 02 2001

Posted February 17 2009 - 02:45 AM

I would certainly spend the money for a good set as long as the movies continue to be good ones. I'm really looking forward to seeing Coraline and Up!

#3 of 18 OFFLINE   todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor



  • 7,017 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted February 17 2009 - 07:12 AM

I have had enough of these 3-d movies...Why? It's bad enough to spend between $6 & $10 for a movie (depending on if its a matinee). But, then to have to pay an additional $3 per person to get the glasses is outrageous. I took 2 of my kids to see a matinee and it was $27 for the 3 tickets!!! If you want to have 3-d fine. Just don't charge extra for the glasses. And yes I know you can save them and not pay again.
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#4 of 18 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor



  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted February 17 2009 - 07:48 AM

Actually, I don't know if you can. I've got a bunch of 3-D glasses from before theaters started setting up recycle/return drop boxes, and I've never heard of one offering to cut you a break on the price if you brought your own glasses. Would be cool if they did, but I don't expect to see it. And these days, $9/ticket is close to what an adult pays for 2-D matinees here in Boston. Of course, that's in part because the savings for going to the early show aren't really substantial any more.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#5 of 18 OFFLINE   Scott McGillivray

Scott McGillivray

    Supporting Actor



  • 852 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 1999

Posted February 17 2009 - 09:44 AM

Last two 3D movies I went to ("Bolt" and "Beowolf") they had some very nice glasses handed out. Nice sturdy plastic and large enough to wear glasses underneath. They just collected them as you left. There was no extra charge for them either. That said, I certainly can see a market for some high-end glasses that properly fit your head etc.
Scott A. McGillivray
Vancouver, B.C.

Struggling Actor and Movie Nut!
(Check out my profile on IMDB!)http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1425496/

#6 of 18 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter



  • 1,747 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted February 17 2009 - 05:19 PM

Heaven forbid we go back to the crappy cardboard specs they gave out at 3-D flicks in the 80's! I had to tear those suckers apart and jam them under my eyeglasses, because no way in heck would they fit over them!

Not to mention the lenses were like granny specs in their scope. Posted Image

The current glasses are a big improvement.

#7 of 18 OFFLINE   ChrisBEA

ChrisBEA

    Screenwriter



  • 1,657 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 19 2003

Posted February 19 2009 - 11:25 PM

I would also suggest the increased price is not merely for the glasses, but to help pay for the expensive projectors needed for 3D, not to mention the increased cost of the prints. I have no numbers to back this up, but it seems logical.

#8 of 18 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor



  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted February 20 2009 - 01:48 AM

Yes on defraying the costs associated with 3-D (new projectors, lenses, often a new reflective screen), but not prints, as most of today's 3-D films don't even have prints; they're entirely digital, and one of the supposed benefits of digital projection is that distribution costs are supposed to drop nearly to zero.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#9 of 18 OFFLINE   3d Movies Fan

3d Movies Fan

    Auditioning



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 11 2009

Posted August 10 2009 - 03:58 AM

RealD and Dolby3d have nice Glasses. Can wait for Avatar in 3d!

#10 of 18 OFFLINE   Todd Erwin

Todd Erwin

    Screenwriter



  • 2,392 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 16 2008
  • Real Name:Todd Erwin
  • LocationOrange County, CA

Posted August 10 2009 - 04:39 AM

There are no "prints" to speak of. You are watching a digital video file that was either shipped on a hard drive or downloaded from a secure site. The hard drives are reformatted and used again after they are returned to the distributor. The actual "print" cost along with freight is negligible compared to the cost of a 35mm print plus the massive freight costs of shipping 5-8 reels per print to each theater.

Originally Posted by ChrisBEA 

I would also suggest the increased price is not merely for the glasses, but to help pay for the expensive projectors needed for 3D, not to mention the increased cost of the prints. I have no numbers to back this up, but it seems logical.



#11 of 18 OFFLINE   Todd Erwin

Todd Erwin

    Screenwriter



  • 2,392 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 16 2008
  • Real Name:Todd Erwin
  • LocationOrange County, CA

Posted August 10 2009 - 04:53 AM

I finally found a theater not too far from me that is a true bargain, especially for 3-D: Cinema City Theatres in Anaheim Hills, CA.

Matinees before noon are $5
Matinees before 6pm are $6
Seniors are $5 ($4 on Wed & Thurs)
Children are $6
Students, police, fire, and military are $8
Evening shows are $9
Dolby 3D surcharge is only $2

Regal charges upwards of $13 for a 3-D matinee!!

#12 of 18 OFFLINE   Big Ben

Big Ben

    Agent



  • 26 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 23 2009

Posted August 10 2009 - 06:06 AM

That's a sweet deal.

My local theater chain Carmike Cinemas have 3-D showings and charge $9 for a matinee and $12 for an evening show.  Except on "Stimulus Tuesdays" where 3-D tickets are $7 for matinees and $9 for evening shows.

I'm pretty sure the "Stimulus Tuesday" special is only availble at select Carmike theaters across the Midwest.  Just FYI.
"After Fight Club, watching football on television will feel like watching pornography when you could be having great sex." - Jack the Narrator
 

#13 of 18 OFFLINE   Leo Kerr

Leo Kerr

    Screenwriter



  • 1,699 posts
  • Join Date: May 10 1999

Posted August 10 2009 - 02:06 PM

One of the problems is, I think right now there are three competing digital systems, that do not use compatible glasses.

Semi-old schooled, used now in 15/70mm Imax 3D halls, using simple polarized lenses.  Linear polarization, angled, I believe, 45-degrees +/- from vertical.

"New schooled" polarized, using clockwise and counter-clockwise circularly polarized lenses.  These don't "ghost" or cross-talk if you tilt your head.  Can be a single projector solution.

New-fangled, without using polarization, using two different color pallettes.  These use projectors with two different sets of RGB filters, yielding a subset of colors overlapped within the two different triangles.  The glasses themselves have different multi-band-pass filters.  Again, no cross-talk, and theoretically, better brightness.  More expensive, has to be a 2-projector system.

Leo


#14 of 18 OFFLINE   Martino

Martino

    Supporting Actor



  • 698 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 1999
  • Real Name:Martin O.
  • LocationSanta Clara, CA

Posted August 13 2009 - 01:57 PM

I actually bought several pairs of "nice" 3d glasses - they look like old style ray-bans and use real blue/red glass instead of plastic.  At the time there were only a couple of 3-D movies available (like the A-bomb movie....).  I got a couple of the more recent 3-D movies (journey to the center of the earth, Caroline...) - only to find that the red/blue from the included glasses is the exact opposite of my "nice" glasses.  I tried to watch them as they were but it wasn't working....so I tried wearing them upside-down so the colors match up.  This sort of works but kind of defeats the purpose...


#15 of 18 OFFLINE   jfoster

jfoster

    Auditioning



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 2010

Posted July 02 2010 - 06:34 AM

I work at a movie theater, and your NOT paying more for the 3D glasses!! You are paying extra because of the equipment and the experiance that Hollywood went the extra effort to bring to you! If you want to be cheap and not pay for it no one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to buy a ticket..I am sick of people bitching!

#16 of 18 ONLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,203 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted July 02 2010 - 07:18 AM



Originally Posted by jfoster 

I work at a movie theater, and your NOT paying more for the 3D glasses!! You are paying extra because of the equipment and the experiance that Hollywood went the extra effort to bring to you! If you want to be cheap and not pay for it no one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to buy a ticket..I am sick of people bitching!



I think most (if not all) people here understand that the equipment is why there is an extra fee but it's not like the theaters are going to start dropping the $3 fee once they've paid off the cost of the equipment.


As for people bitching, I'm sure you're sick of hearing people complain about ticket prices but you come off pretty cowardly when you take shots at people on the internet where you can remain safe and basically anonymous rather than saying it directly to the face of your customers.



#17 of 18 OFFLINE   Pete-D

Pete-D

    Screenwriter



  • 1,746 posts
  • Join Date: May 30 2000

Posted July 02 2010 - 07:31 AM

I think movie theaters might be pushing their luck if they try to price gouge even more for 3D movies. I remember when the "please recycle your 3D glasses" message came up at one movie, some lady shouted out "why? I paid for them!" and several people started cheering. I think that sums up the feeling of a lot of folks (rightly or wrongly). People return the glasses after they're used ... so give them decent glasses if you're going to charge folks basically $2-$3 extra to basically be able to "rent" a pair of 3D glasses for a couple of hours.

#18 of 18 OFFLINE   Chris Will

Chris Will

    Supporting Actor



  • 798 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 2003
  • Real Name:Chris WIlliams
  • LocationMontgomery, AL

Posted July 02 2010 - 09:18 AM



Originally Posted by jfoster 

You are paying extra because of the equipment and the experiance that Hollywood went the extra effort to bring to you!


I'll buy the equipment reason but I call BS on your "extra effort" reason.  All movies take different amounts of effort to make but, they've never charged a premium for higher effort.  If that were the case then movies like Gladiator or Titanic would have charged more then something like Clerks or Blair Witch.


Also, do the theaters actually get that extra money or do the studios get it (serious question, I don't know)?  If the studios are get the extra "3D" money then it really isn't paying for the equipment.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users