What's new

Can't load the extended KING KONG...anyone else? (1 Viewer)

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,929
Real Name
Rick
The new Universal Blu-ray plays fine for the theatrical version, but the moment I press "play" to get to the extended version, I see a flash of the Universal logo, and then the screen goes blank and the entire disc re-loads. Is this a glitch I have to download some friggin' firmware for?
 

Camper

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
844
Location
Florida
Real Name
David Dennis
Mine worked on my Sharp BD 20 (one of the most finicky players ever) so I don't know why it wouldn't work on a good machine. :laugh:
 

Brandon Conway

captveg
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
9,627
Location
North Hollywood, CA
Real Name
Brandon Conway
1. What player do you have?
2. Do you have the most recent firmware?

Can't really go much further into trouble shooting until these get answered.
 

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,929
Real Name
Rick
OK. I needed firmware. Since posting this thread, I downloaded and installed the firmware (for the Sony BDP S300) and, not only does the KING KONG extended version play, but BARAKA - which wouldn't play at all - and the James Bond titles, which had serious issues accessing special features - all play back now. I really wasn't looking forward to having to buy a PS3 just to get these discs to play correctly. Anyway, thanks for your input.
 

Mike Frezon

Moderator
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2001
Messages
60,773
Location
Rexford, NY
I needed to do a firmware update for my Panny BD-10 this week, Dick...in order to get the audio to play right on Mamma Mia!

While some might argue that the audio on Mamma Mia! will never play right...even when it plays correctly (;))...I guess these are examples of why it pays to keep things up-to-speed. I understand that firmware updates are a PITA for some people..but it's pretty cool that the hardware can continue to be updated to stay even with software advancements.
 

Brian L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 8, 1998
Messages
3,303

I really think it's just your player telling you that watching an extended cut of a film that was ALREADY an hour too long was just not in your best interest. ;-)

Brian
 

JustinCleveland

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
2,078
Location
Sydney, Australia
Real Name
Justin Cleveland
No, Mike... the audio quality of that title is excellent. The content quality is highly suspect, as is the purchaser's taste. Not that I don't love Amanda Sefried [sp?] but Pierce Brosnan's singing voice wasn't meant for lossless audio.

(Love you, buddy ;))
 

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,929
Real Name
Rick
Good one, Brian! In fact, I have always hoped that one of these versions would eventually delete the Bronto stampede, which I find exponentially inferior to the rest of the movie in terms of effects work and believability. It's hard to just skip over it without losing desirable material. Jackson, evidently, did not listen to the cries of many like myself who found the sequence to be unacceptably over-the-top and poorly-executed. I know the sequence has its champions, but to my mind it sucks, and its elimination could cut the runnings time by about ten minutes.
 

Brian L

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 8, 1998
Messages
3,303

I really found the film schizophrenic, in that one minute I was watching King Kong, then the next I was watching Jurassic Park IV, and then KK again. I can't fathom what an extended cut would add to the narrative.

I think others have offered the theory that when someone makes one of the most profitable sets of films in history, then that person has earned the right to flip off anyone that tells him how his films should be cut.

Brian
 

Jeff Cooper

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2000
Messages
3,016
Location
Little Elm, TX
Real Name
Jeff Cooper
I put this disc in last night for the first time just to sample some scenes, and the first menu that pops up to choose the extended or the theatrical version demonstrated one of my big menu pet peeves.

When you have a menu with only two selections, there needs to be some kind of external indicator (like a dot or something) that shows you which item you have selected! Simply changing the color on one of the options tells me nothing, since I don't know what color is the "active" selection. Moving the selection simply reverses the colors on the 2 selections, and doesn't give you any more information as to what is highlighted. I ended up picking the wrong one, and thank goodness they had another option on the next main menu for "Go to X version" or I could have been watching for an hour before I realized I was on the wrong version.
 

Mike Frezon

Moderator
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2001
Messages
60,773
Location
Rexford, NY

7+ years on the HTF and I've never seen this verbalized before...but it is, indeed, one of the dumbest things that's done in the creation of movie software. Thanks, Jeff! Maybe you should start a separate thread on this (if you haven't already)! :emoji_thumbsup:

I cannot tell you how many times I've experienced the exact same thing. I sit there and do not have any idea which of the two items has been defaulted to. And I sit changing the colors around having no idea which one I will actually end up selecting.

This is not rocket science.

Note to all disc creators: Put a cursor next to the intended selection and get a clue! :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,521
Members
144,245
Latest member
thinksinc
Recent bookmarks
0
Top