-

Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Boston Acoustics HPS12HOMDNT


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic

#1 of 9 JW3571

JW3571

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 50 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 2008

Posted January 21 2009 - 03:17 PM

I'm considering upgrading from an old Infinity BU10 sub to this BA 12 inch sub. It has 300w rms. Does anyone have any experience with the sub. I found this for $200, that seems like a really good deal. Opinions

#2 of 9 curveball

curveball

    Auditioning

  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 20 2009

Posted January 25 2009 - 02:34 AM

My reply knocks out the BIG ZERO listed for the number of replies to the query about the Boston Acoustics subwoofer.
I suspect the silence is really a shout saying it's no good. I Googled around and couldn't find any reviews on it. That's another hint, I suppose, that it's unworthy.
But it does attract interest when a product originally lists for $600 and not that much later is going for just a tad over $200. Could be a bargain. Could be a bust.

#3 of 9 JW3571

JW3571

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 50 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 2008

Posted January 25 2009 - 03:57 AM

Thanks for the reply. I figured that for $200 it would be a fine replacement for my 15 year old Infiniti sub.

#4 of 9 LanceJ

LanceJ

    Producer

  • 3,168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2002

Posted January 25 2009 - 07:03 AM

Right up front I'll admit I own Boston speakers so I am probably biased, but I think most Boston subs sound great. So I have a strong feeling the actual reason this sub is now going for such a low price is simply because - in my opinion - it is quite unattractive. To me it looks like a commercial plastic office trash can tipped on its side with a grill attached to the can's top.

I think someone at Boston agrees, because just a few months ago they came out with their Classic Series, which pretty much occupies the same price slot as the Horizon series but instead uses traditional styling.

#5 of 9 JW3571

JW3571

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 50 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 2008

Posted January 25 2009 - 08:35 AM

LanceJ, do you have this particular boston sub? I don't really care about looks as it is going behind a couch. The price is great and the amp pumps out 300 watts rms. Sounds like a no brainer.

#6 of 9 LanceJ

LanceJ

    Producer

  • 3,168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2002

Posted January 25 2009 - 08:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by JW3571
LanceJ, do you have this particular boston sub? I don't really care about looks as it is going behind a couch. The price is great and the amp pumps out 300 watts rms. Sounds like a no brainer.
Nope, don't own one. But if you aren't going to see it, you're right, a four hundred dollar price reduction is not something to ignore! I would say go for it then.

#7 of 9 Wayne Ernst

Wayne Ernst

    Screenwriter

  • 2,589 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2002

Posted January 26 2009 - 12:12 AM

I purchased the "HO" sub and then ended up selling it locally. I was one who paid just a bit over $200 for it, but the shipping to RMA it as a return would have killed me (3,000 miles)!.

I didn't like the sub at all. It was very hard to integrate so I could use it for music listening. It just had an odd "boom" that I couldn't cure. I've owned many subs, but was happy when this one sold quickly.
"My reality check ... just bounced"

#8 of 9 LanceJ

LanceJ

    Producer

  • 3,168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2002

Posted January 26 2009 - 07:30 AM

Wayne: I wonder if that boom quality was caused by that plastic enclosure reacting to the woofer's output?

As much as I've liked Boston's stuff over the years, when they were bought out by that banker's holding group back around 2004, IMO some of their gear started taking a turn for the worse & in this case, I think the decision to use a plastic enclosure was purely motivated by cost savings,* Posted Image IMO a design decision the "old" Boston Acoustics would not have agreed upon if doing so audibly affected the sound (injecting molten plastic into a mold is a lot cheaper than having a person cut individual wood pieces, place them into a jig, apply glue etc etc).

* to me Boston was always a company that only included a feature or technology if it truly added something positive to their products, and usually left out things which did not help i.e. one of those no-nonsense companies more concerned about sound - and their customer's wallet - than slick marketing or trendy products. I wish we had more of them these days (Genesis and pre-1996 Advent were other companies who had a similar philosophy)

#9 of 9 Wayne Ernst

Wayne Ernst

    Screenwriter

  • 2,589 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2002

Posted January 30 2009 - 01:14 AM

Lance,

The cabinet in the 12 "HO" seems like a mix of plastic and MDF - with an outer rubber coating. I removed the plate amp from the back of the subwoofer just to check out the construction. The cabinet does have a single brace horizontally mounted inside the cabinet and made from MDF.

I'm not sure what it is with Boston Acoustics subs as i also had the VP900 at the same time. It, too, had issues with getting dialed into my room properly. Most of the other subs I've had, experienced no issues at all. Weird.
"My reality check ... just bounced"