Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

New receiver or a sub??


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 of 6 OFFLINE   Ari

Ari

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 208 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 01:45 PM

I'm in the process of updating the HT which has remained untouched for the past almost six years. I've gotten a new Panasonic 58" plasma and two new DVD players: a Panny BluRay and an Oppo. The rest of the system has remained the same. I've got a DD/DTS HK receiver, Audio Refinement 3-channel amp, JMLab front and center speakers and NHT in-ceiling surrounds. I decided against putting in a sub since my fronts (JMLab Electra 920.1) could go down pretty low and the new baby and a sub probably wouldn't mix well. With the new TV and DVD players, the weak points of my system are the relatively ancient receiver and the lack of a sub. I'm looking at getting an Onkyo 705 receiver and an SVS PC12-Plus sub. The problem is I'm pretty much tapped out due to the TV purchase. Which upgrade should I prioritize: the sub or the receiver??

#2 of 6 OFFLINE   Kevin Stewart

Kevin Stewart

    Second Unit



  • 361 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 07 2003
  • Real Name:Kevin Stewart
  • LocationTexas

Posted December 23 2008 - 03:17 PM

Which BD player did you get? Does the HK receiver have analog in? If so, hopefully you got either the Panny BD35 or Sony 550, since they can both send lossless audio to your receiver via the analog outs. However, regardless of the BD player/receiver scenario, I'd get a sub first.
"the dream never dies, just the dreamer"

#3 of 6 OFFLINE   brandonchenry

brandonchenry

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 129 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2008

Posted December 23 2008 - 04:09 PM

Sub first!

#4 of 6 OFFLINE   Ari

Ari

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 208 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 04:16 PM

The receiver does have analog in and the BD is a BD35. Sub it is then.

#5 of 6 OFFLINE   Kevin Stewart

Kevin Stewart

    Second Unit



  • 361 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 07 2003
  • Real Name:Kevin Stewart
  • LocationTexas

Posted December 24 2008 - 07:07 AM

Oops, sorry. Meant to put BD55 in my post. Any chance of exchanging the BD35 for the BD55? If you did, you might not need a new receiver at all.
"the dream never dies, just the dreamer"

#6 of 6 OFFLINE   JohnRice

JohnRice

    Lead Actor



  • 8,642 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2000
  • Real Name:John

Posted December 26 2008 - 06:29 AM

Sub first. I wouldn't spend the extra money upgrading to the BD55 anyway, when that money would get you closer to an updated receiver. Analog high res audio is always a second choice to hdmi audio. I would just live with standard audio, keep the BD35 and update the receiver later.

The Hybrid System

The Music Part: Emotiva XSP-1, Thiel CS 3.6, Emotiva XPA-2, Marantz SA8004, Emotiva ERC-3, SVS PB-12 Plus 2

The Surround Part: Sherbourn PT-7030, Thiel SCS3, Emotiva XPA-5, Polk & Emotiva Surrounds.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users