Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

New to Blu Ray, am I seeing things?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 05:08 AM

Hey guys-

I just got a blu ray player for Christmas, I opened it early! I got the 2 James Bond box sets last month in anticipation.

I have the Sony BDP-S550 connected to the Pioneer 1130HD 1080i plasma display. The Bond films are the only BD discs I have, other then Hancock which was free as part of the Sony promotion.

I've watched Dr. No, Die Another Day and the first half of From Russia with Love. What I am wondering about is I noticed during panning shots in From Russia With Love and Dr. No, some slight jittering (For a lack of a better word) going on. What I mean is that I notice in the cinema, whenever there is a panning shot, camera moving across a room for example, I can see some slight jittering, or what I think I am seeing are the individual still frames. Perhaps it's some kind of perception thing going on when film is projected.

So I was surprised to see the same thing going on with the Blu Ray disc. I cannot do 1080/24 on this display. Some people with Toshiba HD-DVD players have been able to force it on that Pioneer display that was built one month later then mine. (I tried with my Toshiba HD-DVD player) But I do have the Pioneer's version of 3:2 pull down activated. Or what they call 3:3 as their way to make the 30 fps of video look like 24 fps.

So what I am curious about is, am I actually seeing from blu ray material a more film like experience? I tried the 3:3 pull down off and I think it did not make a difference. I tried the SD DVD of From Russia With Love (when the camera pans back from the chess players in Venice) and didn't see this jitter happen on the Sony BD Player. Whether the 3:3 pull down is working or not, it's a great looking picture and perhaps for the first time, I am actually getting a film like experience(?) If I am not, it's still looking great!Posted Image

#2 of 46 OFFLINE   Stephen_J_H

Stephen_J_H

    Producer



  • 4,075 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen J. Hill
  • LocationNorth of the 49th

Posted December 23 2008 - 05:37 AM

The jitter you describe is quite common and can actually be seen in movie theatres. It is a by-product of film being shot and projected @ 24fps. The theatres try to fix this by using power rectifiers, but it doesn't really work.

Some of the newer 120 Hz displays attempt to rectify this, but the end product winds up looking like video IMHO. I much prefer something that is truer to the theatre experience.
"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player."-- Roger Ebert

#3 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 06:27 AM

Thanks Stephen. Yes, that was what I was referring to seeing the jitter in the cinemas verse home theater where I've not seen the jitter. So this is pretty cool, I like it! I guess the combination of my particular display and settings and the BD does feel like a film-like experience!

#4 of 46 OFFLINE   Lou Sytsma

Lou Sytsma

    Producer



  • 5,351 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998

Posted December 23 2008 - 07:06 AM

Quite a keen eye Nelson. Enjoy your BR player.
Every man is my superior, in that I may learn from him.

#5 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 07:13 AM

Hi Lou! Yes, I placed another foot down the HiDef path in preparation for that certain franchise we're familiar with to be released in blu.

Enjoy the holidays!

#6 of 46 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,712 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted December 23 2008 - 09:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
The jitter you describe is quite common and can actually be seen in movie theatres. It is a by-product of film being shot and projected @ 24fps. The theatres try to fix this by using power rectifiers, but it doesn't really work.

Some of the newer 120 Hz displays attempt to rectify this, but the end product winds up looking like video IMHO. I much prefer something that is truer to the theatre experience.

How are power rectifiers used to correct for this? They convert to DC, filter out any AC component, and then use the DC to power the projector motors? Just curious.
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#7 of 46 OFFLINE   RickER

RickER

    Producer



  • 5,130 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 04 2003
  • Real Name:Rick
  • LocationTulsa, Oklahoma

Posted December 23 2008 - 02:48 PM

Nelson, enjoy my friend!
Keep an eye out with Amazon for the best prices on discs. I have been going crazy this last month!

#8 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 02:56 PM

Hey Rick! Thanks, I am and I will! I have been looking at discs at the Costco site too to compare pricing and selections. But Amazon seems to have the deals.

#9 of 46 OFFLINE   Douglas Monce

Douglas Monce

    Producer



  • 5,514 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2006

Posted December 23 2008 - 03:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
The jitter you describe is quite common and can actually be seen in movie theatres. It is a by-product of film being shot and projected @ 24fps. The theatres try to fix this by using power rectifiers, but it doesn't really work.

Some of the newer 120 Hz displays attempt to rectify this, but the end product winds up looking like video IMHO. I much prefer something that is truer to the theatre experience.


They also use 5 bladed shutters to try and eliminate flicker, however it never really gets rid of the judder. Thats the nature of a film shot at 24 frames per second and part of what we think of as the film look. In fact I'll go as far as to say that the 24fps judder is 90% of the film look.

I have to agree that some of the 120hz TVs that use "motion smoothing" just make the thing look like video. The motion smoothing effect also seems to add digital artifacts. If they would just let the thing run at 120hz with no effect it would look exactly like the film does in the theater.

Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers

#10 of 46 OFFLINE   Dick

Dick

    Producer



  • 4,250 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted December 23 2008 - 03:53 PM

I really wish that, back at the end of the silent era, studios had decided to set the standard at 30 FPS instead of 24, which would have been more expensive by 20% but would have eliminated a lot of flicker and the sort of "jitter" problems described above during pans. Oh, well. What ever happened to Trumbel's ShowScan?

#11 of 46 OFFLINE   Douglas Monce

Douglas Monce

    Producer



  • 5,514 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2006

Posted December 23 2008 - 03:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
I really wish that, back at the end of the silent era, studios had decided to set the standard at 30 FPS instead of 24, which would have been more expensive by 20% but would have eliminated a lot of flicker and the sort of "jitter" problems described above during pans. Oh, well. What ever happened to Trumbel's ShowScan?


I've seen showscan. It looks like a very highly detailed version of the evening news. Really, it looks for all the world like video tape. I don't really like the look of it. It really never got beyond the amusement park type installation, mainly because of the expense.

Frankly I really like the look of 24fps and given the choice that's what I shoot.

Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers

#12 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 23 2008 - 04:01 PM

It is what it is and it's pretty cool that one can actually experience flicker from a blu-ray disc in a home theater! The ability to see the flicker I agree is part of the film like experience.

#13 of 46 OFFLINE   Bruce Morrison

Bruce Morrison

    Supporting Actor



  • 533 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted December 23 2008 - 09:58 PM

Hi Nelson,

I think some people are more sensitive than others to the film judder inherent in horizontal panning shots - I'm also very aware of it when watching Blu-rays and DVDs of movies. As others have said, it's a natural consequence of the relatively slow frame rate (24 fps) used to shoot film, and you shouldn't expect Blu-ray to be any better than standard-def DVD in this respect. I haven't seen a demo of a TV that has motion smoothing by generating interpolated frames, but most other people seem to think the result looks unnatural anyway.

Incidentally a small correction to your original post. Your plasma TV is not a native 1080i set; its native resolution is actually 1024 x 768, and all fixed pixel-based panel TVs, i.e. plasmas and LCDs, display images progressively rather than interlaced by the very nature of the technology. I think you were probably referring to the fact that the TV can accept a 1080i signal, but it will then downscale and deinterlace it to display it at 768p.
Bruce Morrison

#14 of 46 ONLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 40,572 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted December 23 2008 - 11:09 PM

Nelson,

Just wanted to pop in here and welcome you to the Blu-ray club!

Enjoy!

 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#15 of 46 OFFLINE   Vern Dias

Vern Dias

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 142 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 27 1999

Posted December 24 2008 - 01:31 AM

Quote:
The theatres try to fix this by using power rectifiers, but it doesn't really work.
Rectifiers are required in theatres because both carbon arc and Xenon lamps require DC and the mains are AC. All this has absolutely nothing to do with blurring effect you see on the screen on fast pans or fast action.

No theatre would ever use a 5 bladed shutter. However, they were used on telecine chains in TV stations.

Back in the silent days, 3 bladed shutters were used to minimize flicker due to the lower frame rates. However, in today's theatres, screens are too large and the additional light loss caused by a 3 bladed shutter would be unacceptable.


Vern

#16 of 46 OFFLINE   Joseph Bolus

Joseph Bolus

    Screenwriter



  • 2,193 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 1999

Posted December 24 2008 - 01:59 AM

Question: If Nelson's plasma could have accepted 1080p/24, would that have reduced the judder?

Isn't that supposed to be the advantage of a 1080p/24 Hz source?
Joseph
---------------

#17 of 46 ONLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,546 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 24 2008 - 04:14 AM

Hey Ron, Thanks for the welcome to the Blu Ray club! It's going to be fun!

Bruce, thanks for the clarification on my display's resolution. I forget about that since I can more easily remember that the set is designed to accept a 1080i input. And I've been wanting to get a true 1080p display, someday! Best for me to just ignore that info and blissfully think I have a 1080 screen!Posted Image

Joseph, I was curious about that too. But I don't really notice the jutter too often, I was probably looking too closely at the screen whilst checking out what blu ray looks like. If I sit too closely as I did, then I notice it. Both in the theater and at home now!

#18 of 46 OFFLINE   Bruce Morrison

Bruce Morrison

    Supporting Actor



  • 533 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted December 24 2008 - 04:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Bolus
Question: If Nelson's plasma could have accepted 1080p/24, would that have reduced the judder?

Isn't that supposed to be the advantage of a 1080p/24 Hz source?

It would have eliminated one theoretical source of judder - that due to the 3:2 pulldown that is used to correct the running speed of a movie that would otherwise play at the wrong speed. This applies to all standard definition DVDs of movies mastered in NTSC for example. It would also apply to Blu-ray discs if the 24p playback can not be used.

However this type of judder is extremely subtle, and would only be apparent on very slow panning shots. Many people, including myself, never notice it at all.

24p playback does nothing to reduce the much more noticeable judder that is inherent in all films during medium-speed panning shots. This is what the OP was referring to.
Bruce Morrison

#19 of 46 OFFLINE   Douglas Monce

Douglas Monce

    Producer



  • 5,514 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2006

Posted December 24 2008 - 12:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern Dias
Rectifiers are required in theatres because both carbon arc and Xenon lamps require DC and the mains are AC. All this has absolutely nothing to do with blurring effect you see on the screen on fast pans or fast action.

No theatre would ever use a 5 bladed shutter. However, they were used on telecine chains in TV stations.

Back in the silent days, 3 bladed shutters were used to minimize flicker due to the lower frame rates. However, in today's theatres, screens are too large and the additional light loss caused by a 3 bladed shutter would be unacceptable.


Vern


You are right I was thinking of film chain projectors that have 5 blades. However 3 bladed shutters are fairly common. I was a projectionist at a 7 auditorium theater that had Christy projectors with 3 bladed or 72hz shutters.

Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers

#20 of 46 OFFLINE   John Hermes

John Hermes

    Supporting Actor



  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2007
  • Real Name:John Hermes
  • LocationLa Mesa (San Diego) CA

Posted December 25 2008 - 05:14 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
You are right I was thinking of film chain projectors that have 5 blades. However 3 bladed shutters are fairly common. I was a projectionist at a 7 auditorium theater that had Christy projectors with 3 bladed or 72hz shutters.

Doug

Yes, a three-blade shutter will get rid of any hint of flicker at 24 fps, whereas in very bright scenes at theaters with two-blade shutters, you can see a bit of flicker sometimes.


Back to Blu-ray



Forum Nav Content I Follow