Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

DVD Reviews


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#1 of 40 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden



  • 6,154 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted November 07 2008 - 02:16 AM

Quo Vadis: Two-Disc Special Edition

Directed By: Mervyn LeRoy

Cast: Robert Taylor, Deborah Kerr, Peter Ustinov, Leo Genn, Patricia Laffan, Finlay Currie, Abraham Sofaer, Felix Aylmer

Studio: Warner Bros.

Year: 1951

Rated: Unrated

Film Length: 171 minutes

Aspect Ratio: 4:3

Subtitles: English SDH, French, Spanish, Japanese

Release Date: November 11, 2008

With respect to the classic MGM library on DVD, Quo Vadis has been arguably the most conspicuous MIA title for a number of years now. The blockbuster epic was a big commercial success at a time when the studio needed it to survive, and was also the last big hit to be green-lit by Louis B. Mayer. The wait is over as of November 11th, and the DVD is reportedly the beneficiary of a significant film-based restoration effort.

The Film

Quo Vadis tells a story of the early days of Christianity during the reign of Emperor Nero in Rome. General Marcus Vinicius (Taylor) returns victorious to Rome after years of campaigning with his Army regiment. While residing with a retired general, Plautius (Aylmer), he falls for Lygia, a Lygian hostage adopted by Plautius as his daughter. Despite their mutual attraction, Marcus is baffled by her Christian faith. Marcus' fascination with Lygia brings him in contact with early Christian teachers including Paul (Sofaer) and first Apostle Peter (Currie). As these events transpire, mad Emperor Nero (Ustinov) conceives a plan to raze the city of Rome and rebuild it to his own specifications. Nero conceals his plan from one of his top advisors, Marcus' Uncle Polonious (Genn), until Rome is already aflame. The citizens of Rome prove less than understanding of Nero's intent. At the urging of his empress Poppaea (Laffan), who is secretly jealous of Marcus' romantic interest in Lygia, and in the interest of quelling a rebellion, Nero decides to scapegoat the Christians, stirring up prejudice against their fledgling religion, and sending scores of them to their deaths.

The original cinematic rendering of Quo Vadis from 1902 was the progenitor of all subsequent biblical epics. MGM's 1951 remake served a similar purpose by rebooting the dormant genre as a vehicle for big-screen spectacle at a time when films were struggling to compete with television. The tremendous commercial success of Quo Vadis would lead to a resurgence of the genre that would extend well into the 1960s. MGM was struggling as a studio since the late 1940s, and Quo Vadis has been portrayed by historians as both the last blast of Louis B. Mayer, who had presided over the picture's difficult genesis going back to before World War II, and the first blast of Dore Schary, who replaced Mayer as MGM president shortly before it was released. It is much more the former than the latter, although it does serve as something of a hybrid of the cinematic preferences of both men. It is certainly a high-class grand spectacle in the Mayer tradition, but it also has more then enough subtext to be read as a "message picture" in the Schary vein. Stories abound about Mayer rebuffing the desires of Schary and original slated director John Huston to make the parallels between Nero's Rome and Hitler's Germany more explicit. I will leave interpretations of the significance of the film's prominent presentation of Christians being devoured by the beast symbolic of the MGM studio as an exercise for my readers.

In any event, the resulting film is a sprawling epic with an emphasis on big screen spectacle. The film was produced largely at the Cinecittà studios in Rome, and almost no expense was spared. It features a literal cast of thousands, opulent production design, top of the line special effects, amazing set-pieces, a lavish and memorable Miklós Rózsa score, an affirmation of basic Christian values general enough to appeal to non-Christian filmgoers, violence severe enough to result in "not for children" labels on posters and censorship in the UK, and, of course, a little sex. While it at times seems a bit plodding to modern eyes, the film becomes more interesting as the size of the screen on which it is viewed increases.

Robert Taylor gives his typical stiff yet sturdy lead performance, but is hamstrung somewhat by playing a man who is supposed to be a great warrior in a script that more or less makes him a passive hero. Other than a chariot race on the road to Rome in the middle of the film, Marcus Vinicius is kept on the sidelines for all of the film's major action set pieces. Taylor was a versatile old-Hollywood leading man whose stagey acting style would normally seem ideally suited for a lead role in such historical/biblical epics. By giving Taylor so little to do physically, though, the task of conveying Marcus Vinicius' philosophical and spiritual progress throughout the film must be accomplished through variations in tone and expression. This requires a type of nuanced performance which is far from Taylor's strong suit. This also somewhat undermines the chemistry between Taylor and Kerr. Kerr gives a wonderfully expressive performance as Lygia in which her eyes frequently sell her attraction to Marcus Vinicius even when she is verbally rebuffing him, but it sometimes feels like she is playing against a brick wall.

That being said, the performances in this movie that register most strongly are those of Ustinov and Genn. Appearing in his first major Hollywood production, Ustinov gives a career-making performance. His Nero is a strangely sympathetic nightmare of absolute power and complete self-absorption. He commands the viewer's attention whenever he is on screen not simply because he is attired as an emperor, but also because Ustinov conveys an inherently suspenseful sense of capricious insanity that leaves viewers simultaneously fascinated and frightened about where his unchecked ego will take him next. He is quite convincing as a man who could almost literally do anything. As Petronious, Genn is a perfect foil, portraying an extremely self-aware man of keen intellect who has made an art of manipulating his mad emperor through left-handed flattery. Genn gets most of the film's best lines and arguably the best exit, but far from coasting on the strength of the material, he truly seems to revel in the opportunity to play such a character.

The Video

The film is appropriately presented at a 4:3 aspect ratio, and its nearly three hour running time (inclusive of first time on video Overture and Exit Music which play over simple graphics consistent with the film's titles) is spread across two discs. This proves to be a good choice, as much of the film's impact depends on visual detail. The color scheme at times seems a bit tilted towards the yellow end of things, with crimson plumes in centurion helmets looking a bit orange and flesh tones a bit too bronze, but it is not as severe as the "brown out" that was applied to Warner's DVD of Rio Bravo.

The back of the disc case indicates that the film received an Ultra-Resolution restoration while all previous press materials indicated a "meticulous photochemical restoration". While it is my understanding that the latter is the more accurate description, the important thing is that it looks terrific. There is very little visible film damage, near-perfect registration, very good contrast and shadow detail, natural film-like grain rendered acceptably by high bitrate encoding, and no significant signs of ringing along high contrast edges. From a source element standpoint, aside from very minor speckles, there are a handful of scenes which exhibit a mild pulsing in density, but those are about the only flaws I noticed.

The Audio

Audio is provided via a Dolby Digital 1.0 mono track which appears to have been transferred carefully to disc. While pops and scratches have been eliminated, the Warner Bros. audio folks were unusually light handed with the noise reduction. This results in slightly higher background noise/hiss, but improved fidelity due to the relative absence of audible noise reduction artifacts. Source limitations are evident, with somewhat limited dynamic and frequency range, but it is a solid track overall and nothing harmful appears to have been done to it in the digital domain. A Dolby Digital 1.0 French dub is also presented and is of comparable quality to the English track in terms of music and effects.

The Extras

A Commentary from F.X. Feeney spans the film on both discs. This is a very well researched commentary, and critic/filmmaker Feeney delivers his information in a very listenable and well-prepared manner. Feeney covers a broad range of topics relating to the film, MGM, the filmmakers, and the source novel. He never seems to be rushing to get information in, and also he never seems to be talking simply to fill in space. As hard as this may seem to believe, this track is definitely worth the two hours and fifty minutes it takes to listen to it.

Disc One

The Theatrical Trailer (5:10) starts off with a silent text notice to theatrical patrons declaring the film to be universally acclaimed as "the Greatest Motion Picture of our lifetime", and the hyperbole only ramps up from there. My favorite bit of voiceover refers to Robert Taylor: "Through a performance of masterful artistry, he will have lost his own identity and become Marcus Vinicius...". Another good one refers to a quote from Life magazine, also used in the Teaser Trailer, calling Quo Vadis "The most genuinely colossal movie you are likely to see for the rest of your lives." This is a great trailer for fans of vintage Hollywood marketing chutzpah.

Teaser Trailer (1:01) Attempts to pique audience interest multimedia-style by referring to a production photograph that was published in "Life" magazine and then revealing a snippet of the massive Roman parade scene that was the subject of the still photo.

Disc Two

In the Beginning: Quo Vadis and the Genesis of the Biblical Epic (16:9 enhanced video - 43:51) - Aside from the continued commentary, the only extra on Disc Two is this retrospective documentary. It is an above average talking heads, film clips, and behind the scenes photo montage assemblage that provides a nice overview of the film. Topics covered included the appeal of biblical and Roman Empire stories to Hollywood, Henryk Sienkiewiez's Nobel prize winning source novel, the popularity and influence of previous adaptations, the long pre-production history of the MGM film, Hollywood's fondness for British actors in Roman epics, background information on Mervyn LeRoy, the matte paintings and special effects of Harrison Ellenshaw, the music of Miklós Rózsa, the promotion of the film, the film's commercial success, awards nominations, and the film's influence and legacy. On camera interview participants include University College London Professor Dr. Maria Wyke, Gladiator writer/producer David Franzonio, critic/filmmaker F.X. Feeney, USC School of Cinematic Arts Professor Dr. Drew Casper, London Royal College of Art Rector Sir Christopher Frayling, the American Film Institute's Patricia King Hanson, Film Critic/Historian Richard Schickel, USC School of Cinematic Arts Professor Dr. Richard Jewell, Son of Matte Artist Peter Ellenshaw Harrison Ellenshaw, motion picture historian Rudy Behlmer, and Epic Films author Gary Smith.

While few in number, these extras are high in quality and assembled thoughtfully. While there is some unavoidable overlap between Feeney's commentary and the documentary featurette, there is a lot less than I expected, and both seem designed to compliment each other nicely with plenty of interesting production anecdotes and information eclusive to each of them.


The film comes packaged in a hard Amaray-sized case with a hinged tray allowing it to accommodate two discs. The cover image is of Taylor behind the reins of a chariot with a somewhat odd "straining to stool" look on his face. I generally prefer DVD covers from original poster art, but to be fair, the original posters for Quo Vadis were actually pretty lame for a film so important to the studio that was marketed so aggressively.


The classic MGM larger than life epic Quo Vadis finally has arrived in convenient five inch disc form. The film is split over two discs with excellent video quality and color timing that seemed noticeably, if not excessively, tilted towards the yellow end of the spectrum. Audio is courtesy of a solid mono track. Extras are limited in number but high in quality, including two trailers, a well-researched commentary from critic/filmmaker F.X. Feeney, and a scholarly retrospective documentary that nicely compliments the commentary track.

Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#2 of 40 OFFLINE   john a hunter

john a hunter

    Supporting Actor

  • 755 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2005

Posted November 07 2008 - 08:29 AM

A good and well thought out review Ken,although for me and I don't think I am alone,no graphics over the Overture and play out is far better than even simple ones! Warners obviously know they shouldn't be there as some titles such as 2001 are presented properly with a blank screen. Always thought Taylor to old for the part but that was typical of Hollywood at the time and a shame about the intermission thought its position always seemed strange to me. Will be on my BD list for next year.

#3 of 40 OFFLINE   Bill Parisho

Bill Parisho

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 140 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2004

Posted November 09 2008 - 06:23 AM

My feeling is that Quo Vadis is one of the earlier biblical epics but may not be one of the better ones. The performances by Ustinov and Genn do elevate the film's status. However, having said that, I believe, Ken, that this was one of your best DVD reviews. Perhaps, I may still buy this title and check it out. I haven't seen the movie in years. It's possible that the film is better than I recall. Bill Parisho

#4 of 40 OFFLINE   AdrianTurner


    Second Unit

  • 400 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 05 2007

Posted November 09 2008 - 06:42 AM

One aspect of Quo Vadis not alluded to Mr McAlinden's otherwise excellent review is the film's overt references to the Hollywood blacklist. Derek Elley, in his seminal book The Epic Film, draws deep significance from Petronius/Leo Genn's suicide note to Nero: ". . . . Adhere to your special gifts - murder, arson and terror. Mutilate your subjects if you must but with my last breath I beg you, do not mutilate the arts." This magnificent sub-textual speech must have sounded extraordinarily rich and subversive in 1951 and somehow proved too subtle for LB Mayer's ears. Elley writes, "[This] final barbed letter to Nero is transfigured into a great anti-McCarthy speech for fifties America." On another topic entirely, I have always admired Quo Vadis for its architectural integrity - the Christians are obviously martyred in the Circus Maximus, not an amphitheatre, which is historically accurate. Full marks for that, if little else!

#5 of 40 OFFLINE   Joe Caps

Joe Caps


  • 1,955 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2000

Posted November 09 2008 - 07:43 AM

too bad the intermission was not restored. They could have finagles end of act one as the music for the end of the act still exists (its called chariot chase on the soundtrack LP). In the triumphal march, early in the film, Rod Taylor is looking in the crowd to see if the girl he met the night before, the red haired Lygia (played by Deborah Kerr) is in the crowd. He sees a girl with re hair throw flowers to him. It's sixteen year old (and chubby) Sophia Loren !! I think there are many good performances in this film. Not mentioned here so far is Patricia Laffan as Poppea. Also watch Marina Berti as Leo Genns slave girl. She's wonderful. She also was pretty much cut out of two of the biggest spectacles. In Ben Hur, she's Ben Hurs girlfriend in Rome. Almost all of that section of the film was cut from the final print. But she can be seen at Charlton Hestons side at a party in Rome. She also played the Queen of Tarsus in the liz taylor Cleopatra. Here part in that was completely cut from the movie.

#6 of 40 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden



  • 6,154 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted November 09 2008 - 01:45 PM

Both excellent points, Joe. I almost mentioned that Taylor's acting style seemed to mesh better with Laffan's in their scenes together than with Kerr's. Regards,
Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#7 of 40 OFFLINE   Andrew Budgell

Andrew Budgell


  • 1,352 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2002
  • Real Name:Andy Budgell
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted November 09 2008 - 02:19 PM

That's something I didn't know. Would you mind elaborating?

#8 of 40 OFFLINE   Dick



  • 4,782 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted November 13 2008 - 04:16 PM

I wish studios would stop considering viewers to be dimwits by pasting freeze-frames with "Overture," "Intermission," "Entr'acte" and "Exit Music" graphics over the music for these films. If people are really so dim-witted as to need to know why there is a black screen with the music, there could be a brief, separately-chaptered title card just for them reading, "This film contains an Overture, (fill in whatever is included) as heard in the original theatrical presentation. A black screen will accompany the music that was heard during the initial Roadshow engagements. This is normal - there is nothing wrong with your t.v." Or something like that. With certain laser disc players, one could freeze-frame one of the black frames before these graphics came on and play the music through without them. With DVD's, there isn't yet a way to do this.

#9 of 40 OFFLINE   Douglas R

Douglas R


  • 1,990 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2000
  • Real Name:Doug
  • LocationLondon, United Kingdom

Posted November 13 2008 - 06:42 PM

This trailer advertises the Blu-ray edition and an Ultimate Collector's Edition. So where are they?
IMDb Video: Quo Vadis

#10 of 40 OFFLINE   David_B_K


    Advanced Member

  • 1,767 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2006
  • Real Name:David

Posted November 14 2008 - 01:23 AM

. I also wish they would ALWAYS have a chapter stop between the overture and the main title. There may be times I want to skip the overture, or maybe I just want to watch the credits sequence. Two offenders in this category include Spartacus and Lawrence of Arabia.

#11 of 40 OFFLINE   ahollis



  • 6,222 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted November 14 2008 - 02:25 AM

The best idea I heard of for the overture was a black screen with the word Overture, Intermission, etc. superimposed in the bottom right hand corner. I am happy the Fox released several with a blank screen for the overture, South Pacific and Oklahoma special editions come to mind. But at least they were not as stupid as MGM that left off the Overture of It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World because they misunderstood the complaints about the Overture on the VHS and Laser version.
"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman

#12 of 40 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden



  • 6,154 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted November 14 2008 - 02:54 AM

I do not have strong feelings about how they present the Overture and Exit Music, but if they feel like they have to show something, red velvet curtains without any text might be nice. Posted Image

Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#13 of 40 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer

  • 19,079 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted November 14 2008 - 03:24 AM

Thanks for an excellent review, Ken! You would have encouraged me to order it, but frankly: I already did (and received it yesterday), because it's the first time it gets on DVD. Haven't seen it yet, but your review is highly promising. BTW, this 1951 version is one of the few versions of the film with the question mark missing from the title. I don't know why. Even with the question mark, most people would understand that the reference to the apocryphal tale was meant to have a broadened meaning here, addressing humanity in a more general sense.
Possibly. But the text was very close to that of the original book, if I remember well. Which of course wasn't written with any knowledge at all of the McCarthy period. Cees

#14 of 40 OFFLINE   Billy Batson

Billy Batson


  • 1,911 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 19 2008
  • Real Name:Alan
  • LocationLondon

Posted November 14 2008 - 03:27 AM

Another vote for that. My memory of overtures in the cinema, is the backlit curtains (usually red), & as the overture comes to an end, the lights go down & the curtains open.

#15 of 40 OFFLINE   Greg_M



  • 1,193 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2000

Posted November 14 2008 - 04:10 AM

Dick that's a good point, but sometimes a nice graphic to accompany the music is also welcome and having nothing to do with dim witted people not knowing what's going on

#16 of 40 OFFLINE   Douglas R

Douglas R


  • 1,990 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2000
  • Real Name:Doug
  • LocationLondon, United Kingdom

Posted November 14 2008 - 06:20 AM

That would be more appropriate. After all, the audience didn't look at a black screen during the Overture or Entr'acte music In fact most people didn't even hear the music because they were too busy making their way to their seats or talking or were still in the bar. It was only the last 30 seconds or so, as the lights dimmed, that the auditorium went quiet. We're lucky that with DVD we can now hear the music without that general hubbub.

#17 of 40 OFFLINE   john a hunter

john a hunter

    Supporting Actor

  • 755 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2005

Posted November 14 2008 - 08:16 AM

Couldn't agree more. Films should be presented on video as in the theatre and that of course is without any of this nonsense. What is annoying about Warners is that they normally do everything else so well yet keep doing this crap. Presumably where there is someone around looking after the director's interest they back off and we get the overture, etc presented properly.2001 is an example not doubt as a result of the Kubrick Estate but not the smilebox HTWWW which tries so very well apart from this to replicate the theatrical experience. Three cheers for Fox then for doing it right for the Sand Pebbles BD.

#18 of 40 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden



  • 6,154 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted November 14 2008 - 10:12 AM

The meaning of the title is also made plain in the context of the film when St. Peter asks God the question before deciding to turn back to Rome. Regards,
Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#19 of 40 OFFLINE   Jack Theakston

Jack Theakston

    Supporting Actor

  • 856 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2003

Posted November 14 2008 - 10:55 AM

Actually, if you want an amiable compromise, why not have curtains on the screen that open up on the company logo during the overture? Also, I guess Warners decided against using the stereophonic re-mix that was done in 1954 for the general release. Too bad.
-J. Theakston

#20 of 40 OFFLINE   OliverK



  • 2,150 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted November 14 2008 - 08:01 PM

This would be a nice compromise and even preferable to a black screen to those who do not have curtains covering all of their screen (I guess less than 1% of the viewers of such a disc are equipped that way). And the opening of the curtains could be perfectly timed, too Posted Image

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users