Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Why are some LCD TVs 16:10??

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Todd K

Todd K

    Second Unit

  • 479 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 21 2001

Posted October 29 2008 - 04:19 AM

So I'm looking at the Samsung LN22A450, and I notice the aspect ratio is 16:10. Why is that? I know computer monitors often have that ratio, but why an HDTV? My parents would be getting this TV, and I don't want them to be confused as to why high def content still has black bars.

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   Robert_J


    Lead Actor

  • 8,214 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 22 2000
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMississippi

Posted October 29 2008 - 06:48 AM

If HD content has black bars on that TV, they are probably so small as to be not noticed. You do need to explain to them that there will be black bars above and below on 2.35:1 content and on each side on 4x3 content. -Robert

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   Joseph DeMartino

Joseph DeMartino

    Lead Actor

  • 8,308 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Joseph DeMartino
  • LocationFlorida

Posted October 29 2008 - 11:56 AM

According to the specs on the Samsung site, that model has an screen aspect ratio of 16:9. The maximum resolution is given as 1680 x 1050, but resolution would only translate to aspect ratio if the pixels were perfectly square - which they aren't.

As Robert noted you will still have to explaiin pillarboxing on 4:3 material and why wider-than-1.85:1 films like Star Wars, Titanic, Cleopatra, Ben Hur, etc. still have "black bars" because they have to in order to display at the correct AR. (Unless they watch them on one of the many HD services that crops and butchers such films to make them fit a 16:9 frame.)



#4 of 7 OFFLINE   Todd K

Todd K

    Second Unit

  • 479 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 21 2001

Posted October 29 2008 - 01:26 PM

Thanks, guys. If the pixels are not square, then everything's OK. I was concerned because someone on another forum gave the TV a bad review because the picture was slightly distorted from having a 16:10 ratio. And googling "LN22A450 16:10" yields numerous hits. My folks understand the black bar situation, but a real 16:10 ratio would just have thrown a wrench into the works.

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Zack Gibbs

Zack Gibbs


  • 1,687 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 2005

Posted October 29 2008 - 01:56 PM

Looking at the picture on the site it's definitely a 16:10 ratio. I overlayed little green squares to be sure, the squares are exactly 160x100 pixels.
Posted Image
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

#6 of 7 OFFLINE   Allan Jayne

Allan Jayne


  • 2,406 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998

Posted October 31 2008 - 10:55 AM

1. We're still not sure what the TV does with shows that are exactly 16:9, whether it morphs the picture to exactly fill the 16:10 screen. 2. When your parents start watching movies with different aspect ratios, they will quickly see that all except one aspect ratio leaves black bars somewhere on the screen.

#7 of 7 OFFLINE   clchen711



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 05 2009

Posted February 05 2009 - 11:07 PM

The black bar is a good place to display sub-titles, menu. etc. If you hate the sub-titles that block the critical part of the 16:9 ration HDTV screen as I hate them, you probably would appreciate/like a HDTV with 16:10 ratio screen (with the sub-title/menu bar). However, I am not sure how soon manufactures and consumers would realize the benefit of 16:10 (1920:1200) HDTV screen and apply the extra bar/space to display texts/menu though. Plus, the 16:10 ratio is wide PC/notebook display friendly/compatible!

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users