-

Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Dark Knight: To IMAX or not?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
28 replies to this topic

#1 of 29 derek

derek

    Second Unit

  • 497 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 20 1998

Posted July 25 2008 - 03:41 AM

I know some sequences in 'Dark Knight' were filmed with IMAX cameras. Due to nature/depth of the film for a first viewing would you recommend seeing it on a big spectacle IMAX screen or a typical sized multiplex theater where it might be a slightly more intimate viewing?

#2 of 29 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,658 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 03:52 AM

I saw the theatrical verson first (midnight showing last Friday) because I wanted to watch it for the plot mainly, and then saw it on IMAX last Saturday, and was able to appreciate more details from the larger (everything) from the film, and not also be trying to keep up with the plot of the film. It worked out for me, though others have seen it on IMAX first, and then saw it on the smaller, more conventional theater screens.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#3 of 29 Brent M

Brent M

    Producer

  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted July 25 2008 - 04:24 AM

If you can, definitely see it in IMAX. I was absolutely blown away by the experience. Posted Image
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#4 of 29 Brian D H

Brian D H

    Second Unit

  • 453 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 02 2004

Posted July 25 2008 - 04:30 AM

Do not miss it in IMAX! It's completely immersive with a real sense of motion and I never noticed the changes in aspect ratio. In fact, I had to consciously check a few times to notice what the aspect ratio was; the transitions were that smooth.

That having been said, I'm not sure your FIRST viewing should be IMAX. Mine was, and I had a little trouble following all the action during the fight scenes because I had to turn my head slightly to see the entire screen. If your first viewing is in IMAX I'd recommend sitting far enough back so you can take in the entire screen without moving your eyes or head too much.
Lurking at HTF Since 2001

#5 of 29 Thi Them

Thi Them

    Producer

  • 3,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 20 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 04:45 AM

The IMAX version didn't do much for me. There were gorgeous views of the cities but that was pretty much it. It didn't benefit the action, and at times, it was distracting. I suppose that if the regular theaters near you don't offer the best presentation, you might want to watch it in IMAX just for the better picture quality and sound.

~T

#6 of 29 Chuck Mayer

Chuck Mayer

    Lead Actor

  • 7,974 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2001
  • Real Name:Chuck Mayer
  • LocationNorthern Virginia

Posted July 25 2008 - 05:20 AM

My first viewing was IMAX, and I wouldn't trade it for anything. The joy of the cinema is contained not only in the story, but the presentation, and the IMAX scenes are completely encompassing. It was a marvel and a great theatrical experience.

My second viewing was a standard cinema, and it was excellent as well.

I will take in a third viewing in a few weeks, and will choose the IMAX format for that one. It's the first theatrical film to really use the format, so I think it's well worth seeing there, even at the added cost and possible inconvenience.
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?

#7 of 29 Matt Butler

Matt Butler

    Screenwriter

  • 1,921 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 23 2001

Posted July 25 2008 - 05:31 AM

I had to see it in regular cinema for first viewing. Sacramento IMAX doesnt get the DK print untill Aug 29th. Posted Image

Cant wait
My Blu Rays
http://www.blu-ray.c...ol...=Dj Matt B

Favorite films of all time in no order
1. Zodiac 2. Dawn of the Dead (1978) 3. The Good The Bad and The Ugly 4. Blade Runner 5. The Warriors 6. Dark Knight 7. The Godfather  8. Bullitt 9. Experiment in Terror 10. Raiders of the Lost...

#8 of 29 Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Producer

  • 5,066 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted July 25 2008 - 06:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
It's the first theatrical film to really use the format
I've read something about that before. I saw the last Superman movie in Imax. It was not shot for Imax? What did they do to get it into Imax format?
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#9 of 29 Jonesy

Jonesy

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 55 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2007

Posted July 25 2008 - 06:54 AM

I think Christopher Nolan would want you to see it in IMAX. Who are we to argue with him? Posted Image

You'll get a better picture and better sound.

Jonesy
The Dark Knight in IMAX

#10 of 29 Sean Laughter

Sean Laughter

    Screenwriter

  • 1,385 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 07:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
It's the first theatrical film to really use the format, so I think it's well worth seeing there, even at the added cost and possible inconvenience.

I'm not sure I'd really say that. The very first "commercial" film I remember seeing in IMAX was Fantasia 2000 (and I think the IMAX version was actually shot on IMAX film rather than getting the DMR-process treatment most of the commercial films get today - with the exception of the IMAX-native segments of TDK). Disney knew it was going to be exclusively IMAX for a while (at least I think it was), but I can't remember if I read they did any special formatting or anything knowing it was going to be in IMAX. It was letterboxed if I rememeber correctly, and from what I'm hearing the IMAX shots in TDK open up to fill the whole IMAX screen (seems like that would be a bit distracting).

I certainly felt the "Pines of Rome" and "Firebird Suite" sequences in Fantasia gained alot from being on the IMAX screen versus my one viewing of it in a conventional theater.

#11 of 29 Chris Will

Chris Will

    Supporting Actor

  • 733 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 2003
  • Real Name:Chris WIlliams
  • LocationMontgomery, AL

Posted July 25 2008 - 07:44 AM

If Fantasia 2000 was letterboxed on an IMAX screen then it wasn't true IMAX (it would have filled the screen if it was). The ratio changes were not distracting at all during TDK and after awhile I didn't even notice them. The IMAX presentation of TDK blew the 35mm presentation I saw away IMO. The audio in IMAX was unbelievable!

#12 of 29 TheBat

TheBat

    Producer

  • 3,007 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 02 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 08:53 AM

I also live in the sacramento area. I traveled 2 hours to watch it at the dublin theatre.. since the sac was not getting until august 29th.

Jacob

#13 of 29 Bejoy

Bejoy

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 61 posts
  • Join Date: May 13 2001

Posted July 25 2008 - 09:09 AM

Even though some action scenes was shot in IMAX, it don't have the full resolution....

http://www.studiodai....ssue/9703.html

Still worth it...

#14 of 29 Nicholas Martin

Nicholas Martin

    Screenwriter

  • 2,683 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted July 25 2008 - 09:32 AM

The first IMAX DMR film was Apollo 13, and that was the last time I'd seen a film in an IMAX theater - that was in 2002.

It. Was. Spectacular.

#15 of 29 Mark Kalzer

Mark Kalzer

    Second Unit

  • 443 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 19 2000

Posted July 25 2008 - 10:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Angell
I've read something about that before. I saw the last Superman movie in Imax. It was not shot for Imax? What did they do to get it into Imax format?

Superman was not shot in IMAX. It was shot conventionally (in digital I believe) and 3D scenes were converted, but since it was not shot 3D on set they had to do the 3D work entirely in post. The result was an extremely fake looking 'cardboard cutout' appearance which looked exactly like what it was... certain elements of the frame cut apart by virtual scissors and placed farther away or closer on the 3D plane, but with none of the depth you'd expect from 3D. It was more a distraction then anything.
- Mark Kalzer

#16 of 29 Brent M

Brent M

    Producer

  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted July 25 2008 - 12:18 PM

Nolan is the first person to ever shoot a conventional motion picture with IMAX cameras so even though practically any film "could" be shown in IMAX, The Dark Knight is the only one to have portions of it shot in the format.
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#17 of 29 cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,031 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 04:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholas Martin
The first IMAX DMR film was Apollo 13,

What is "DMR"?
 

 


#18 of 29 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,658 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 04:27 PM

It's the process of taking the regular 35mm film reels and blowing them up for IMAX presentation (to be feed through the IMAX projectors).
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#19 of 29 Nicholas Martin

Nicholas Martin

    Screenwriter

  • 2,683 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted July 25 2008 - 05:33 PM

And at the time, the size of the IMAX film reels limited the runtime to 2 hours, which is why if you see the 10th Anniversary Apollo 13 DVD, the IMAX version included is shorter than the original theatrical version.

#20 of 29 cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,031 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted July 25 2008 - 07:08 PM

Does it stand for anything or is it just another random collection of letters?
 

 



Back to Movies (Theatrical)



Forum Nav Content I Follow