Jump to content



Photo
DVD Reviews

HTF DVD REVIEW: Vampyr



  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 of 10 Matt Hough

Matt Hough

    Advanced Member

  • 9,916 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 2006
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted July 16 2008 - 03:25 PM


Vampyr
Directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer

Studio: Criterion
Year: 1932
Aspect Ratio: 1.19:1
Running Time: 73 minutes
Rating: NR
Audio: Dolby Digital 1.0 mono German
Subtitles: English
MSRP: $ 39.95

Release Date: July 22, 2008
Review Date: July 16, 2008


The Film

3.5/5

Carl Dryer’s Vampyr is an uneasy mix of shadows and the supernatural. Shot as something of a fever dream with continuity lapses, multiple points of view, and a story that stubbornly refuses to follow the rules of logical plotting, Vampyr is best appreciated as a visual-aural experience, an unsettling mix of story and character that is unquestionably one-of-a-kind. It’s the least “vampish” vampire movie ever made (i.e. there isn‘t a fang in sight), but that doesn’t prevent it from being creepy and compellingly different.

Studious, sensitive Allan Gray (Julian West, the screen name of the film’s co-producer Nicolas de Gunzburg) has great interest in the supernatural and especially in all things vampire, and he finds himself at a peculiar inn and interrupted while trying to fall asleep by the intrusion into his room by a troubled old man (Maurice Schultz) who hands him a package which is not to be opened until his death. He’s sensing that death is near because his daughter Léone (Sybille Schmitz) has displayed signs of “blood infection” and is slowly dying, and he’s determined to prevent it if possible. Following the elderly man to his estate, Allan sees the effects of the “blood disease” and volunteers to donate his own blood for a transfusion. The doctor (Jan Hieronimko) performing the blood withdrawal, however, is in league with the local vampire Marguerite Chopin (Henriette Gérard), and he’s taken blood from Allan to weaken him and has also bound Léone’s younger sister Gisèle (Rena Mandal) to prevent her from interfering with the final attack on the sadly weakened girl. It’s a race to see who will get the girl and how it will be accomplished.

The script by Carl Dreyer and Christen Jul has been culled from two stories in Sheridan Le Fanu’s In a Glass Darkly, but Dreyer’s direction is by far the most striking aspect of this production. His concentration on shadows, many macabre and often surreal, and his tendency to hop jarringly from one set-up to another and then back to the initial one gives the film an eerie ambiance, a disquieting sense of unbalanced reality that makes up for an otherwise genuine lack of traditionally “undead” production values. And he films two sequences that still stand out today over three-quarters of a century later. In the first, Allan dreams of his own burial while also watching it, and Dreyer shows it sporadically from a subjective point of view putting us in the casket with him and watching helplessly as events transpire. The climactic death of a major character in an unusual way (no spoilers offered here) is shown in visceral close-up, too, a death that even the primitive sound of the time can’t sully. This was one of the earliest German sound films, and yet much of its power is achieved from facial expressions and camera effects (blood seeping into the dirt, double exposures, reverse motion) that were perfected during the silent era.

Many of the actors in the film were amateurs, and their inexperience often shows. Julian West is fairly stiff and inexpressive though one can use his weakness as an actor as an example of his character’s basic ineffectualness. Rena Mandel as Allan’s love interest also is vacuously pretty but not very interesting. However, Sybille Schmitz makes a vivid impression as the victimized Léone, and Jan Hieronimko as the doctor, despite this being his first and only film, certainly delivers in a performance that brings to mind the demented sneer of Werner Krauss’ Doctor Caligari.


Video Quality

2/5

The film is presented in its original aspect ratio of 1.19:1, one of the narrowest frames ever used in filmmaking (The 3 Penny Opera which I reviewed some months ago shared this same frame size), though Criterion has not windowboxed it. The film is 76 years old and has been pieced together from multiple prints to arrive at this final product; thus, to say it’s in rough shape is an understatement. Obviously much as been done to bring it to even this level of presentation, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t many white and black scratches, flecks and other debris, a limited grayscale that features weak blacks and very milky contrast and softness in all of the outdoor photography. Whites are somewhat better, and inside camerawork is a great deal sharper. The English white subtitles are difficult to read on some text pages which feature German black print on a white background. Otherwise, the titles are easy to read. The film has been divided into 16 chapters.

Audio Quality

2.5/5

The Dolby Digital 1.0 mono sound surprised me a bit in its range. Sure, fidelity is of necessity limited for such early sound recording, but it doesn’t sound nearly as tinny as I was expecting. There is some hiss and a good deal of flutter on the track which no amount of processing could eliminate.

Special Features

4/5

Disc one contains a superb audio commentary by film historian Tony Rayns. It’s filled with fascinating information about the making of the movie and some incisive critical analysis of the movie, too.

Disc two begins with a 1966 documentary by director Jorgen Roos which covers Carl Dreyer’s entire film career from 1920-1964 showing clips from the films and interview footage with the director compiled over the years but some made especially for the documentary. This feature runs 29 ¾ minutes.

Film scholar Casper Tybjerg contributes a marvelous video essay on the various influences on Dreyer that helped him to create Vampyr. Included in this featurette are photos, film clips, and interview footage both audio and video (some from the previous documentary). It runs 36 minutes.

A 1958 radio broadcast in English by director Carl Dreyer concentrates on his ideas about what constitutes admirable qualities in film (one word: simplicity) and his opinion about the abuse of the use of color photography in movies. (His choice of the greatest color film: Japan’s Gates of Hell). The rather dry lecture lasts 23 ½ minutes.

The box contains a 214-page paperback book containing the entire screenplay for Vampyr as well as the short story “Carmilla” which was partly the inspiration for the screenplay for Vampyr.

The usual Criterion booklet is 44 pages and contains stills from the film as well as an appreciation of the movie by Danish critic Mark Le Fanu, an analysis of the vampire tradition contained in the film by novelist Kim Newman, notes on the restoration of the movie by Martin Koerber, and a 1964 interview with the star of the film as printed in Film Culture.

In Conclusion

3.5/5 (not an average)

There has never been a suspense picture quite like Vampyr. More shuddery than scary, it does gain from multiple viewings especially once you put the pieces of its surreal storytelling together into some kind of sensible arrangement. For fans of early avant-garde filmmaking, it’s certainly worthy of a rental, and the entire package is a good bargain by Criterion standards.


Matt Hough
Charlotte, NC

#2 of 10 Bob McLaughlin

Bob McLaughlin

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,129 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 14 2000

Posted July 22 2008 - 01:38 AM

Thanks Matt! I was hoping it would score better PQ than 2 out of 5, but anything is better than the Image Entertainment version. And I'm excited about the supplemental material as well. I hope this groundbreaking film gets the attention it deserves.
"I'LL SHOW YOU THE LIFE OF THE MIND!!!" - Barton Fink

#3 of 10 ahollis

ahollis

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 5,133 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted July 22 2008 - 06:26 AM

Got my copy during lunch after reading your review. I also hoped there was better source material but I am sure Criterion is giving us the best out there. I am looking forward to watching it tonight.
"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#4 of 10 Ed St. Clair

Ed St. Clair

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 3,320 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001

Posted July 22 2008 - 03:13 PM

Thanks for reviewing this film.
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

#5 of 10 Mark Zimmer

Mark Zimmer

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,258 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted July 23 2008 - 02:47 AM

Considering it's only by sheer luck that this movie survives at all, I wouldn't be that picky about the quality of the elements. I'm sure Criterion has done what they can with it.

#6 of 10 jsteffe

jsteffe

    Newbie

  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2008

Posted August 06 2008 - 10:19 AM

The issue regarding image quality of the Criterion VAMPYR is a wee bit more complex than you're portraying it. An arbitrary numerical score like 2/5 isn't particularly helpful in this case.

Yes, the film survives in in relatively rough condition, but least part of what you complained about--"a limited grayscale that features weak blacks and very milky contrast and softness in all of the outdoor photography"- was absolutely intentional on Dreyer's part. This is like complaining that the image in SPEED RACER is unnaturally sharp or has "too much color saturation"

First, it should be noted that Dreyer shot the exteriors in the early morning, which may have contributed to the "misty" look. He wanted to convey the feeling of a gray twilight world. I've also read accounts that the Director of Photography Rudolph Maté placed gauze over the lens to soften the image in many exterior shots.

And regarding the "very milky contrast," here's a quote from Dreyer himself: "We had begun shooting on the film - starting with the opening scene - and after one of the first screenings of the rushes we noticed that one of the takes was gray. We wondered why, until we realized that a false light had been projected on to the lens. We thought about that take, the producer, Rudolph Mate and I, in relation to the style we were looking for. Finally, we decided that all we had to do was deliberately repeat the accident. So after that, for each take we arranged a false light by directing a spotlight hung with a black cloth on to the lens."

I hope this clarifies matters for everyone on HTF, in case they mistakenly believe it's merely a mediocre-looking transfer on Criterion's part, which it assuredly is not. The photography is one of the reasons why the film is considered so stylistically innovative.

#7 of 10 Mark Zimmer

Mark Zimmer

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,258 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted August 11 2008 - 03:27 AM

Right. There is one shot that is very clear---the closeup of the engraving on Allan Gray's wall. There's a bucketload of fine detail visible there---making it obvious that the rest of the mistiness and softness is an intentional choice by Dreyer and not a problem with the transfer. I have to believe this looks very much like Dreyer wanted it to.

#8 of 10 James 'Tiger' Lee

James 'Tiger' Lee

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 03 2007

Posted April 12 2009 - 08:00 AM

Posted Image


This odd tape like glitch is on the UK Eureka DVD. Is it on the Criterion?

#9 of 10 James 'Tiger' Lee

James 'Tiger' Lee

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 03 2007

Posted April 12 2009 - 08:06 AM

Also, does the French version of the film survive intact? It does not have the censor issues that affect the German versions (one of which completely changes the narrative drive of the film) and it'd be a crying shame to see it never get its dues as the proper way to see the film

#10 of 10 James 'Tiger' Lee

James 'Tiger' Lee

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 03 2007

Posted May 04 2009 - 03:04 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by James 'Tiger' Lee
Posted Image


This odd tape like glitch is on the UK Eureka DVD. Is it on the Criterion?

Anyone?





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: DVD Reviews

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users