Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Ballard's search for Titanic a cover-up


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 of 12 OFFLINE   Dennis Nicholls

Dennis Nicholls

    Lead Actor



  • 8,278 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 1998
  • Real Name:Dennis
  • LocationBoise, ID

Posted June 02 2008 - 08:57 AM

Well this is interesting. I always wondered how Ballard got his funding.

ABC News: More Mystery Shrouds the Titanic


Feline videophiles Condoleezza and Dukie.


#2 of 12 OFFLINE   DaveF

DaveF

    Moderator



  • 15,820 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2001
  • Real Name:David Fischer
  • LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted June 02 2008 - 09:05 AM

Wow! I look forward to reading this article tonight Posted Image

#3 of 12 OFFLINE   JeremyErwin

JeremyErwin

    Producer



  • 3,219 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 11 2001

Posted June 02 2008 - 12:38 PM

Old news:

SUBMARINES, SECRETS, AND SPIES (Nova, January 19, 1999)

It's still an interesting story, but it's not revelatory.

#4 of 12 OFFLINE   Dennis Nicholls

Dennis Nicholls

    Lead Actor



  • 8,278 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 1998
  • Real Name:Dennis
  • LocationBoise, ID

Posted June 02 2008 - 02:26 PM

I wonder why ABC treated it as a "news story"? Posted Image
Feline videophiles Condoleezza and Dukie.


#5 of 12 OFFLINE   JeremyErwin

JeremyErwin

    Producer



  • 3,219 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 11 2001

Posted June 02 2008 - 04:32 PM

there's also an upcoming National Geographic programme on this

#6 of 12 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,634 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted June 04 2008 - 09:12 AM

I suppose the cold war mentality had something to do with the secrecy, but is there any practical reason to keep the search secret from the soviets? I can only think that it would give them a clue to where the subs were, but, so what? Would it have been a security breach if the soviets had found the subs? What would the soviets have gained? BTW, I don't think I ever learned how much they found. Were hulls or portions of hulls found?
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#7 of 12 OFFLINE   ChristopherDAC

ChristopherDAC

    Producer



  • 3,729 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2004

Posted June 04 2008 - 10:15 AM

Details of U.S. submarine construction would be very valuable to anyone planning to fight U.S. submarines (find the vulnerable spot). More than this, the Soviets could easily have picked up quite a bit of technology they didn't have, giving them a serious advantage — especially since the U.S. did not have a clear picture of Soviet technical capabilities. And, of course, both subs were loaded down with nuclear warheads, & U.S. warheads were (still are) significantly better in terms of yield per unit mass & per unit volume. A part of the secrecy, though, was undoubtedly just "on general principles" paranoia.

#8 of 12 OFFLINE   andrew markworthy

andrew markworthy

    Producer



  • 4,769 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 1999

Posted June 04 2008 - 08:52 PM

To be frank, they're pretty vulnerable to any sort of attack - if you can find them in the first place. The most valuable information about a submarine is its sound and vibration signature and how it displaces the water. Information such as the size and shape of the propellor, design of the shaft, material covering the hull, size of engines, type of sound insulation would all be invaluable in this regard.

#9 of 12 OFFLINE   Michael Warner

Michael Warner

    Supporting Actor



  • 742 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 24 1999

Posted June 05 2008 - 03:14 AM

I like the Hughes Glomar Explorer story better. I remember my geology professor in college going on and on about the importance of mining undersea manganese nodules while the whole time it was all just a front for an attempt to find a Russian sub.
Xbox Live: mugwumps

#10 of 12 OFFLINE   ChristopherDAC

ChristopherDAC

    Producer



  • 3,729 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2004

Posted June 05 2008 - 04:37 AM

The sad part is, we still need those nodules. Just one of the problems of the Law Of The Sea Treaty…

#11 of 12 OFFLINE   Jeff Savage

Jeff Savage

    Second Unit



  • 387 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2001

Posted June 05 2008 - 08:39 AM


You must not have seen the recent re-make of the Andromeda Strain where the future us sent back a message via a worm hole saying that those vent and nodules contain the only antidote to this virus Posted Image

Laters,
Jeff
...wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world...

#12 of 12 OFFLINE   Inspector Hammer!

Inspector Hammer!

    Executive Producer



  • 11,067 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 15 1999
  • Real Name:John Williamson
  • LocationWilmington, Delaware

Posted June 10 2008 - 10:20 AM

This makes it sound as if finding TITANIC was just a "bonus" or something, not the case, Ballard truly wanted to find TITANIC and his love for it was genuine. I have read his book Discovery of the TITANIC 3 times and that passion is palpable in those pages.
"That's Jack Bauer!!!!!! He's coming for me!!!!!" - Charles Logan




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users