What's new

Samsung sued over "defective" BD players (1 Viewer)

craig_curtis

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
179
Location
Glen Ridge, NJ
Real Name
Craig
don't they have firmware updates for that kind of thing? I mean I'n not positive, but seems the xbox 360 hd-dvd updates for just about every HD disk I put in it. And I've read about people "bricking" their players with bad disks or ISO burns or whatever, so I imagine it would at least be possible. If he is THAT worried about it, why did he spend a grand for unproven technology?
 

Cees Alons

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 31, 1997
Messages
19,789
Real Name
Cees Alons
They are referred to as "defective players" throughout the document, apparently because they won't play Blu-ray discs of the newer standard levels (it's not really specified in the piece).

The plaintiff is a New Jersey consumer who bought the player in July last year. And it's a class-action, because he "assumes" that there are a uncountable number of deceived consumers like him.

But why just Samsung? Other BD-players won't play some newly newly BDs either.

And did the manufacturer really promise (explicitly or implicitly) that the players would continue to play all future Blu-ray discs?


Cees
 

Jeff Swindoll

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 19, 2000
Messages
505
I'll be interested to see what happens, as one who has a profile 1.0 player, although not a Samsung, that promises not to play the newer special features (SE being the operative word since it does play the movie). Unless this suit is not about that, printed off the 15 page document but haven't read it yet.
 

nolesrule

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
3,084
Location
Clearwater, FL
Real Name
Joe Kauffman
The sad thing about a class action lawsuit is it'll end in a settlement where the class (Samsung BD player owners) will receive a free firmware upgrade disc and the lawyers will get several million dollars. That's how these things always go.
 

Jeff Swindoll

Supporting Actor
Joined
Mar 19, 2000
Messages
505

Sadly, that's the way it usually happens. The lawyers always make out like bandits.

Some things stood out at me in the document "Defendant has not repaired or UPDATED the defective Blu-ray disc players..." and "failing to issue firmware updates." So the dude just doesnt want to download or have a firmware sent to him instead of contacting Samsung or has Samsung not put out a firmware update for his player? Sounds like a stupid lawsuit to me and my scanning didnt see anything about "profiling."
 

Adam Gregorich

What to watch tonight?
Moderator
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
16,530
Location
The Other Washington
Real Name
Adam
As I understand it, it's not about profiles, but the fact that it can't play specific titles. Yes FW updates should be able to fix it, so I'm not sure what the purpose of the lawsuit is. Not to mention that some of the titles that required a FW update could have been related to authoring problems and other disc problems, but it could have been easier to to player FW updates than recall the discs (an example would be Children of Men on HD DVD).


I think you nailed this one. Ironically, the class can already get free FW discs. I predict that this will lead someone to sue over BD profiles, since there is no way for an average customer to know about that....
 

nolesrule

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
3,084
Location
Clearwater, FL
Real Name
Joe Kauffman
As long as the Profile number is listed somewhere on the product package (and in the manual), there would be no basis for the lawsuit.
 

Ron-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
6,300
Real Name
Ron

I sure can, and I'm happy to see it happen. I bought a Blu-ray player, it should play every Blu-ray title I buy. Fact is, it doesn't. Who's fault, no one but Samsung.

I bought a PS3 several weeks ago to replace my faulty BD-P1000, it has no problems playing any Blu-ray discs, even the several that the P1000 wouldn't even spin.
 

wally

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 12, 2001
Messages
473

I've got a GE 8 track player in the basement that refuses to play BRs and HD-DVDs. Heck, I can't even push the discs into the slot. Anyone want to join my "class"?
 

Ron-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
6,300
Real Name
Ron
Hey Wally, does yuor GE 8 track player have a Blu-ray logo on it and state that it's a Blu-ray player like my BD-P1000?
 

Adam Gregorich

What to watch tonight?
Moderator
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
16,530
Location
The Other Washington
Real Name
Adam
It could be that some of those titles were manufactured out of spec and rather than have the studios recall the product, most companies did FW updates.

Is your player running the most current FW?
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,896
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
As a working lawyer who used to practise with a firm that was getting into the class action, ahem, "action", this hardly surprises me. The question is whether or not the lawyers will get enough people to constitute a class. How many BDP 1000s did Samsung sell?

FTR, I'm much happier doing what I do now.
 

troy evans

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 2, 2005
Messages
1,294
Exactly Ron. You make a damn good point here. It seems easy for people to joke and make light of a situation with a bunch of BS analogies that have nothing to do with the problem. When I invest money in products I expect them to do what they state to do. No one would expect an 8-track to play BDs or HDs, so where that off the wall comment comes from is beyond me. This lawsuit shows me that the average consumer may not want to put up with the crap that the rest of us have become accustomed to over this past year. Bluray needs to finalize that spec and only sell players that meet it. The rest need to be removed from the stores or discounted with a disclaimer.
 

Jonathan Kaye

Second Unit
Joined
Oct 19, 2000
Messages
399
Real Name
Jonathan Kaye

Er, surely 'wally' was poking fun at the lawsuit by suggesting another equally-stupid one, namely suing because an obsolete format doesn't play a newer one?
 

Paul.S

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2000
Messages
3,909
Location
Hollywood, California
Real Name
Paul
This is gonna be very interesting. I was waiting for this to happen, with a plaintiff alleging breach of the implied warrant of merchantability, which is precisely one of the allegations in the complaint.


Happy we've got an attorney in the thread. Stephen, couldn't Samsung avoid liability in connection with the implied warrant of merchantability cause of action by having a disclaimer in the manual? Something along the lines of "Because of differences in authoring of some Blu-ray Discs, some discs will not play."

And doesn't the class have to be certified before the complaint is filed?
 

Cees Alons

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 31, 1997
Messages
19,789
Real Name
Cees Alons
I don't own one of those Samsungs, but I wouldn't be surprised if the disclaimer was there. A similar disclaimer is printed on the disc cases, isn't it?


Cees
 

wally

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 12, 2001
Messages
473

On the nose Jonathan!

Ah frivolous lawsuits. When we built our house, the window screens actually had big stickers on them warning that the purpose was to keep insects out, not people!

My guess is someone sued the screen manufacturer after a burglar broke into their house thru a window equipped with said window screens.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,052
Messages
5,129,673
Members
144,281
Latest member
blitz
Recent bookmarks
0
Top