Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

NCAA College Football 2007

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
637 replies to this topic

#1 of 638 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,226 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 25 2007 - 12:00 PM

Only a week away, and it looks to be a fantastic year. Though I must say, despite the across the board preseason praise for USC, I would be pleasantly surprised if we go undefeated in the regular season. There are a lot of dangerous games on the schedule for USC, and because they've battered nearly every PAC10 team for five or six years in a row, every conference game is like playing a conference championship, because it's the most important game of the season for our opponents. And the PAC 10 is no slouch either, probably the second most competitive and strongest conference in the country behind the SEC. The final six games on our schedule are brutal, Notre Dame will badly want to beat us in South Bend after our last visit there, but whether or not the Irish will be strong enough to do that is anyone's guess; we'd be foolish to underestimate that game. Nebraska will be a difficult game, perhaps our toughest game this season, and their new QB, Sam Keller, is experienced playing against SC. UCLA will be a tough team to defeat, and probably the number two in the PAC 10 this year, and if both SC and UCLA go into their matchup undefeated it'll be like the Michigan OSU game last year. That said, I think that's only the third most difficult game for SC, the second, I think, will be Washington, a much more dangerous team than is often given credit. It looks like it'll be a great year for college football. I'd love to see USC and LSU end the season at 1 and 2 as well, because LSU is still pissed at SC for splitting the national championship with them a few years ago, and it would make for a really terrific game. I searched for college football but only found last years thread, if there's an ongoing thread please merge.

#2 of 638 OFFLINE   Scott Merryfield

Scott Merryfield

    Executive Producer

  • 11,273 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998
  • LocationMichigan

Posted August 25 2007 - 10:48 PM

Michigan is getting a lot of love in the Big Ten. Their offense should be powerful, with QB Henne, RB Hart, WR's Manningham, Arrington, Matthews, LT Long, and TE's Massey and Butler all returning. The Wolverines' defense will be the key to how well the team finishes. They lost four starters to the first two rounds of the NFL draft, so there will be some new faces there. Michigan has two key stretches to their schedule. The first is games 2-4 in September when they play consecutive home games vs. Oregon, Notre Dame and Penn State. The second is their final two games -- at Wisconsin and vs. Ohio State in Ann Arbor. If they can get through September undefeated, the Wisconsin game may be for the Big Ten title. The Badgers look like the other top contender in the conference, as Ohio State lost a lot of talent.

#3 of 638 OFFLINE   george kaplan

george kaplan

    Executive Producer

  • 13,064 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted August 26 2007 - 03:45 AM

I'm very cautious about this season. I thought last year that USC would be great, and they let me down big time. I'm happy to see their preseason ranking, cause it indicates that (on paper at least), they have a good team. But anything less than a 13-0 season will have failed to live up to the hype. I'm keeping my fingers crossed, but I'm not counting on a successful run this year.
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder

"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.

"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...

#4 of 638 OFFLINE   Shane Martin

Shane Martin


  • 6,017 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 1999

Posted August 26 2007 - 04:25 AM

The Big 12 south will be a 2 man race as usual(OU and Texas). The Big 12 north should be dominated by Nebraska again. Nothing really new. Oklahoma has a new QB so all bets are off. They are loaded everywhere else but the QB being a big question mark is leaving me unsure of how they will finish.

#5 of 638 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,226 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 26 2007 - 07:33 AM

I think Missouri is going to surprise in the Big 12 North and end up playing in the conference championship against Oklahoma or Texas. They started off great last year but stumbled, this year they should be much stronger and more consistent.

#6 of 638 OFFLINE   SethH



  • 2,867 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 17 2003

Posted August 26 2007 - 11:07 AM

Virginia Tech is picked by many to win what looks to be a relatively weak ACC this year. If our offensive line has improved significantly from last year then I think we may have a chance to do just that. Our home/away schedule works out pretty good this year with most of our difficult conference games being played at home. A primary concern, and possible predictor for the remainder of our season comes in week 2 at LSU. That's going to be a difficult game. Again, I think if our offensive line can hold up we will stand a reasonable chance, especially if our defense can rattle their first-year starting QB.

#7 of 638 OFFLINE   Mike Williams

Mike Williams


  • 1,020 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 03 2003

Posted August 26 2007 - 11:16 AM

Oklahoma has only to get through Texas on a very realistic chance of getting to the National Championship game -- for its fourth time in eight years -- to face either USC or LSU. Miami in week two will be a challenge, but Miami is waaay down from where they were a few years ago. With OU/USC or OU/LSU, one would be a rematch of the Suger Bowl four years ago, and one would be a rematch of the Orange Bowl the year after. Oklahoma is sooooo loaded in every other position that the QB has to only not mess things up, and all three QBs are quite talented, if inexperienced.

#8 of 638 OFFLINE   BrettB



  • 3,024 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2001

Posted August 30 2007 - 05:53 AM

I hope all the OU hype is warranted. I'm a little leary myself.

#9 of 638 OFFLINE   KevinGress


    Supporting Actor

  • 724 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 24 2005

Posted August 30 2007 - 06:22 AM

As a Husker fan, that's a nice thing to hear. I'm cautiously optimistic about this season. I'm still not sold on Callahan and have even less confidence in his DC, Kevin Cosgrove (just see how well Wisconisin is doing now that he's left). I think Keller will continue to be a mixed bag - sometimes looking like an AA, and other times throwing interceptions right and left, and the defensive line will need to be rebuilt. In the end, I think Missouri will be the main obstacle towards returning to the B12 championship and will determine either a very good, or a very mediocre season.

#10 of 638 OFFLINE   BrettGallman



  • 1,392 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 11 2002

Posted August 30 2007 - 02:19 PM

As has become the norm for Clemson football for the past few years, I'm going in with cautious optimism. I think we can win 9 ball games if we can beat FSU opening night (Monday Night on ESPN Posted Image). It all depends on our QB, which is the same qualifier we had with Will Proctor last year. In fact, the team is pretty much exactly the same as it was last year with a new OL and some new wideouts.
Oh, the Horror - Horror Reviews from All Decades and All Sub-Genres!
Balls Academy -  Your Alma mater for teen films, raunchy, low-brow comedies, sexploitation & coming of age dramas.
Other recent reviews: Super | Thor Tobacco RoadSource Code | Sucker Punch |

#11 of 638 OFFLINE   Joseph Bolus

Joseph Bolus


  • 2,225 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 1999

Posted August 31 2007 - 04:20 PM

Haven't we *already had* a College Football 2007 thread??

In fact, here it is:

Perhaps this should be the 2008 thread ...

#12 of 638 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,226 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 31 2007 - 06:40 PM

it's 2007 now. last year it was not 2007.

#13 of 638 OFFLINE   Adam_S



  • 6,226 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2001

Posted August 31 2007 - 06:43 PM

as a Mizzou fan, the Mizzou Nebraska game is the non-USC game I'm looking forward to most this season. Mizzou has great potential to break out this year, last year they never gelled, but this year they may pull it off because they're a more seasoned team.

#14 of 638 OFFLINE   ThomasC


    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted September 01 2007 - 07:09 AM

Yeah, thet defense isn't looking too good right now against a I-AA team. Granted, Appalachian State has won the past two I-AA championships.

#15 of 638 OFFLINE   Patrick_S



  • 3,159 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 2000

Posted September 01 2007 - 07:43 AM

No question about it, Michigan deserves to drop all the way out of the top 25.

#16 of 638 OFFLINE   ThomasC


    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted September 01 2007 - 07:43 AM

HOL. EEE. SHIT. Appalachian State 34 Michigan 32

#17 of 638 OFFLINE   James L White

James L White

    Supporting Actor

  • 840 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 29 2002

Posted September 01 2007 - 07:48 AM

I love it!!!
Samsung HL-S5688W 56" DLP
Panasonic TC-P50X1 50" Plasma TV (bedroom)
Toshiba HD-A2 HD DVD's
Panasonic BMP-BD60
Sony BDP300 Blu Rays (bedroom)

#18 of 638 OFFLINE   Chris


    Lead Actor

  • 6,790 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 1997

Posted September 01 2007 - 07:54 AM

Proof why we should disband all pre-season polls, and polls should only be published after at least 2 or 3 games.

Problem is, Michigan will probably stay ranked.

Give it several games to determine where teams really should be ranked. Posted Image
My Current DVD-Profiler

"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07

#19 of 638 OFFLINE   Michael Warner

Michael Warner

    Supporting Actor

  • 742 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 24 1999

Posted September 01 2007 - 08:07 AM

I'm a Michigan alumnus, a season ticket holder even though I live on the West Coast, heck my dad even played football at the Big House, and all I can say about this loss is "good." It's been too many years of squandered talent, overly conservative play calling, and resting on historic laurels. Playing in the Big Ten has just added to the problem since you don't really have to be all that good to do well in the conference. While Michigan has been spinning its wheels for the past ten years and squeaking by with an adequate offense and defense the other elite teams in the country have brought the college game up to NFL levels in many respects. We've been out recruited, out coached, and usually out played but somehow have managed to remain in the top tier through luck and Big Ten weakness. Today was a wake-up call and I hope that things will start to change for Michigan. The near miss against Ball State last year, three consecutive losses to Ohio State, and four consecutive bowl losses probably should have been enough to do the trick but apparently that wasn't the case. Instead it'll take one of the greatest upsets in college football history to hopefully get things going in the right direction but who knows. I still bleed maize and blue and will be cheering the team on next week against Oregon but the players, alumni, and fans deserve better than they've been getting the past few years.
Xbox Live: mugwumps

#20 of 638 OFFLINE   Dome Vongvises

Dome Vongvises

    Lead Actor

  • 8,174 posts
  • Join Date: May 13 2001

Posted September 01 2007 - 08:23 AM

Yeah that one was my fault. Posted Image I'm surprised the mods didn't change the thread title.

Anywho. Wow, just wow. Seriously, I have no idea how Michigan is going to recover. Isn't this the third game they've lost in a row dating back to last season?

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users