Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Blockbuster to favor Blu-ray HD discs over DVD format

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
257 replies to this topic

#41 of 258 OFFLINE   DavidJ



  • 2,776 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 23 2001
  • Real Name:David

Posted June 18 2007 - 09:38 AM

I actually like Blockbuster now that they added their Total Access program. It made it much better than Netflix for me. I may change back with this news. I will have to see. Fortunately, there is a local chain near me that is renting both formats.

#42 of 258 OFFLINE   wendortb



  • 12 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 02 2007

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:02 AM

A local news station just did a story on this. I think this is a big blow to hd-dvd because the publicity that blu-ray is getting for this. I don't remember my local news station ever doing a story on hd-dvd vs blu-ray. Here's a quote I thought was interesting in the article:
Here is the full story if anyone is interested: wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6675122 sorry for no link, don't have enough posts.

#43 of 258 OFFLINE   CRyan



  • 1,244 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 1999

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:22 AM

Yes, this is more a blow due to media attention than anything else. Joe consumer who actually looked at these in the store will think Blu Ray now rather than HD DVD IMO. Honestly, if I was buying one or the other RIGHT NOW - I would buy Blu Ray just because this news tells me at least someone has media for me to play.

#44 of 258 OFFLINE   RobertR


    Lead Actor

  • 9,635 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:25 AM

It's not a knockout because BR hasn't overwhelmed HDDVD. More titles? Is there a big difference? How many titles have been released on each format? Better technical specs? How does that translate into better picture/sound quality? Is anyone saying that the typical BR disc looks/sounds better than HDDVD? BR is capable of more storage, but the fact is that the typical BR disc is NOT dual layer, and is smaller in capacity than the typical HD disc. I think the pressure needs to continue to be applied.

#45 of 258 OFFLINE   Phil Iturralde

Phil Iturralde


  • 1,868 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 07 1998

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:51 AM

FYI: An interesting interview video w/Nick Shepherd, COO of Blockbuster; Warren Lieberfarb, Toshiba Advisor; James McQuivey, Forrester Research - with CNBC's Maria Bartiromo.

My HT Enthusiasts Google Website
---- Toshiba 62HM196 62" 1080p DLP HDTV pic's (#1 in Consumer Reports)
DVD Aficionado (DVDAF) on-going list.
Acquisition Rule #59 “Free advice is seldom cheap.” (Quark @ DS9)
JBL S-Series + SVS 25-31PCi (SN: 00034) w/NSD Upgrade!

#46 of 258 OFFLINE   Jordan_E



  • 2,233 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2002

Posted June 18 2007 - 12:53 PM

I keep hearing larger capacity, and yet both Pirates movies had to be released on two discs! Anyway, if Blockbuster steps up with enough Blu Rays in store, I will simply rent my HD DVDs online and return them for Blu rentals in store. Total Access indeed!
And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...

#47 of 258 OFFLINE   Ed St. Clair

Ed St. Clair


  • 3,320 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001

Posted June 18 2007 - 01:31 PM

It's funny to me, HD DVD diehards would completely back away from Bb over this. Thus insuring HD DVD's total failure at Bb. Yeah, that will show them!!! ;-)
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

#48 of 258 OFFLINE   Jason Roer

Jason Roer

    Supporting Actor

  • 977 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2004

Posted June 18 2007 - 01:56 PM

Very good point Ed. I was going to cancel my Blockbuster account due to terrible shipping on their part prior to this announcement. The only reason I may change my mind is exactly the one you've pointed out. I figure I'll take one for the team here and keep up the savage HD-DVD rentals on my end! Have the 3 at a time plan and all I rent are HD-DVDs right now (in store is another matter entirely as although I happen to live in Manhattan - I somehow cannot find a store out of the 250 anywhere near me to rent HD instore Posted Image )



#49 of 258 OFFLINE   Jason Roer

Jason Roer

    Supporting Actor

  • 977 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2004

Posted June 18 2007 - 02:00 PM

CRyan, I see where you're going with the Joe Consumer theory - the only thing is, Joe Consumer is nowhere near ready for either format. Hearing that BB is renting Bluray exclusively instore will have no bearing on whether Joe Consumer will make an HD Optical purchase. Only extremely lowered hardware pricing can do that. And even then - the masses have only just (over the last 3 years) accepted SD DVD. The HD Optical format was introduced way too early. Of course - I'm thrilled it's here. I love HD, but for the masses it's just another irrelevent piece of technology. And who can blame them really when they see how it's setup in Best Buy or Circuit City? God they make it look terrible in these stores. I was just in a Circuit City today and they were showing Happy Feet on Bluray and they had the contrast and color so high the penguins looked completely flat. And I know how much 3-dimensionality there is to that disc because I own it (although on HD-DVD, but I've heard the discs are very similar). Cheers, Jason

#50 of 258 OFFLINE   Dave H

Dave H


  • 5,354 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted June 18 2007 - 03:05 PM

As someone mentioned, HD DVD was going to originally be 720p. As far as player prices, no doubt they would have been higher for both formats initally... don't forget the HD-A1 was going to retail for $999 originally. The poor transfers were mostly from Sony and Lionsgate initially - the other studios were good for the most part. I'm sure the market would have resisted if the transfers across the board were poor. I don't think they'd be any going back to that again if Blu-ray wins. The quality expectations are too high from this market now.

#51 of 258 OFFLINE   Chris S

Chris S


  • 2,532 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2000
  • Real Name:Chris S

Posted June 18 2007 - 03:52 PM

Very good point. In a way this make BB move a self fulfilling prophesy.
DVD & Blu-ray - It's all about the movies!

#52 of 258 OFFLINE   DavidJ



  • 2,776 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 23 2001
  • Real Name:David

Posted June 18 2007 - 04:07 PM

So wait, we shouldn't "vote" by taking our business elsewhere. I guess that means we should continue going to BB and NOT rent HD DVD. That will send a message. Posted Image

#53 of 258 OFFLINE   Jason Roer

Jason Roer

    Supporting Actor

  • 977 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2004

Posted June 18 2007 - 04:18 PM

David, I happen to be format neutral, but at this point I only have an HD-DVD player. I really don't care who wins the war, but the fact remains that those who want Blockbuster to rent HD-DVDs instore will need to show them there is a market for it. In the video referenced above, the head of Blockbuster said they'd rent HDDVD if it turns out to gain a lead. While I think it is short sighted to go Bluray only at this point, not renting HD-DVDs from blockbuster online out of spite would give them no reason to begin renting HD-DVDs instore. I mentioned in a post above that because of poor shipping, I had planned on canceling my Blockbuster account before I had even heard about their decision. But now I'm going to keep the account open and keep renting HD-DVDs from their online store so I can show them there is a market. Hopefully others won't jump ship. Cheers, Jason

#54 of 258 OFFLINE   Chris S

Chris S


  • 2,532 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2000
  • Real Name:Chris S

Posted June 18 2007 - 04:20 PM

That's the point. You can still rent HD DVD from BB via online and in the original 250 stores. By taking your business elsewhere you guarantee that their interpretation that "the customers want Blu-ray" becomes truth (at least for them). If not then how would BB ever know, as some have asserted here, that customers do want HD DVD? I don't think that Netflix is going to show Blockbuster their rental data. Posted Image And with the HD media market being so small I doubt they'll see any truly impacting fallout from their decision.

In the end, what Blockbuster is noticing here is that HD DVD is a sell through market item. You don't get a 20:1 attach rate by renting titles. People who are passionate about HD DVD are buying titles much more often than renting. Blockbuster is simply less interested in those customers because that's not their primary business.
DVD & Blu-ray - It's all about the movies!

#55 of 258 OFFLINE   Kevin. W

Kevin. W


  • 1,546 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 27 1999

Posted June 18 2007 - 05:25 PM

Though I own both formats, I see it as just another short sighted decision on BB part. Reminds me off the WS/FS fiasco that went on a couple years ago. And for anyone to say that its in the benefit off the customer to only stock one format has no idea what there talking about. Those who are wanting to rent either BR/HDDVD formats, know exactly which player they have. Its the consumer who owns neither one that will be confused. Easily solved by having a separate section in the store for the new formats and not integrating them in with the regular movies.

#56 of 258 OFFLINE   Ryan-G


    Supporting Actor

  • 621 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 2005

Posted June 18 2007 - 06:16 PM

While I find BB's announcement very interesting, and I guess it could have an effect, what I find more interesting is: It's widespread general news. If HD-Media is/will be only niche, why is MSNBC carrying this as a headline, along with local stations(apparently)? J6P can be swayed by significant media coverage, can be convinced he needs something. I mean, no one shrugged when it was DVD-Audio or PSP movies, but this is getting mainstream attention. I don't think this'll be niche by a long shot...

#57 of 258 OFFLINE   Christopher_S


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 121 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 25 2001

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:03 PM

I thought the same thing. I was driving out of Chicago yesterday listening to WGN, and they were teasing an upcoming show where the question of "Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD" was going to be discussed. Weird to hear either format talked about on mainstream media.
[T]he founders of the Super 8 motel chain must surely have been ignorant of the meaning of suppurate. -- David Foster Wallace

Yapping - teamubermensch.podbean.com/

PS3 - CDStucky360 - Chopper Newt 

#58 of 258 OFFLINE   Douglas Monce

Douglas Monce


  • 5,514 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2006

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:08 PM

Well to be fair MSNBC it's self is a niche. Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers

#59 of 258 OFFLINE   ppltd



  • 3,044 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 30 2006

Posted June 18 2007 - 11:33 PM

It is currently not wide spread news. A report on MSNBC, a niche in itself, does not make it so. This story is only a blip on the news casts, and the only reason it made it to the headlines is that it pertained to Blockbuster, a company that is news worthy.
Thomas Eisenmann(Last updated 09/30/11)

Blu-Ray Collection  DVD Collection, Numerous BD players,

LG 55LX6500 55-Inch 3D 1080p 240 Hz LED

Pioneer VSX-94TXH, Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D 1080p (PT-AE8000 Just Ordered, 

1124 BDs and going up, 1028 - DVDs and going down.

#60 of 258 OFFLINE   John Berggren

John Berggren


  • 3,245 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 17 1999

Posted June 19 2007 - 02:20 AM

The Pirates movies were two discs, yes. One 50gb disc dedicated entirely to each film, and a 25gb to the special features. This is a bad thing because?
Support the fight against Multiple Sclerosis as I ride in the 2007 MS 150 in New Bern this September.

Be a Widescreen Advocate

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users