Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

30 replies to this topic

### #1 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 10 2007 - 06:08 AM

Simple....I have three 6-sided dice. I want to know the total number of unique results I can obtain by repeatedly throwing all three dice.

111
112
113
114
115
116
121
etc, etc....

I'm guessing it's 6^3, but can someone confirm and prove this?

Thanks for you help!

### #2 of 31 OFFLINEbetooz

betooz

Agent

• 41 posts
• Join Date: Dec 11 2006

Posted April 10 2007 - 06:12 AM

6^3 is correct

### #3 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 10 2007 - 06:17 AM

Do you have anything I can use to support this? I want to be able to explain it to my friend too.

### #4 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 10 2007 - 06:21 AM

Ok, nevermind. I figured it out. Every dice increases the power. One die would give you 6 possibilities or 6^1 Two would give you 6^2 and so on...

### #5 of 31 OFFLINEBrian D H

Brian D H

Second Unit

• 453 posts
• Join Date: Sep 02 2004

Posted April 10 2007 - 06:29 AM

This one's easy. Any aging role-playing gamers could explain this one (and draw the bell curve) in their sleep. Range 3 to 18 Center of bell curve 10.5 etc. etc. etc. (God, I'm a geek.)
Lurking at HTF Since 2001

### #6 of 31 OFFLINEandrew markworthy

andrew markworthy

Producer

• 4,769 posts
• Join Date: Sep 30 1999

Posted April 10 2007 - 07:06 AM

The formula is simply n1 x n2 x ..... where n is the number of choices on each die (this allows for difference sided dice being used in the same process). The fun sets in when you have different biases in individual dice. And this is a major reason why I was so glad to give up probability and stick to statistics.

### #7 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 10 2007 - 08:52 AM

So let me ask this then. Lets say there were six 6-sided dice and you can toss any number of dice you want, as long as you tossed at least one.

Based on your formula, the amount of possible outcomes would this be....

n=6

(n) + (n1 x n2) + (n1 x n2 x n3) + (n1 x n2 x n3 x n4) + (n1 x n2 x n3 x n4 x n5) + (n1 x n2 x n3 x n4 x n5 x n6)

?? Is that correct?

And no, Im not cheating on a test....

• 8,972 posts
• Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted April 10 2007 - 09:40 AM

Yes but your notations are a bit sloppy there and mostly pointless with your n=6 condition. -- H

### #9 of 31 OFFLINESami Kallio

Sami Kallio

Screenwriter

• 1,035 posts
• Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted April 10 2007 - 09:51 AM

x[n] = 6^n + x[n-1]

### #10 of 31 OFFLINEGregg Loewen

Gregg Loewen

Video Standards Instructor, THX Ltd.

• 6,369 posts
• Join Date: Nov 09 1999
• Real Name:Gregg Loewen
• LocationNew England

Posted April 10 2007 - 11:52 AM

sounds like you need help with your home work ??

The Sonodome - circa 2001
The Newest Sonotube - circa 2001
Gregg's DVDs updated...sometimes
Lion Audio Video Consultants usually current

### #11 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 10 2007 - 12:12 PM

No, actually a co-worker asked me the original question earlier in the day and I wanted to be able to explain it to her. The second one was asked because that's the way she first presented the question to me. My curiosity was taking over. I took Prob. & Stats years and years ago and remember it as well as I remember the one semester of Japanese as a freshman.

Not to mention, I'm bored today....

### #12 of 31 OFFLINEChris Lockwood

Chris Lockwood

Producer

• 3,215 posts
• Join Date: Apr 21 1999

Posted April 10 2007 - 02:49 PM

It's actually not 6 to the 3rd power, since the original question said "unique".

### #13 of 31 OFFLINESami Kallio

Sami Kallio

Screenwriter

• 1,035 posts
• Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted April 10 2007 - 03:28 PM

It's 6^3 since 1,1,2 and 2,1,1 are unique.

### #14 of 31 OFFLINEDaveF

DaveF

Moderator

• 15,525 posts
• Join Date: Mar 04 2001
• Real Name:David Fischer
• LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted April 11 2007 - 12:06 AM

What's your formula for, Kami? x(n) = 6^n + x(n-1) = (3 dice, 6 sides) x(n) = 6^3 + 6^2 + 6^1 + 6^0 + 6^(-1) + ... or maybe you just meant x(n) = 6^3 + 6^2 + 6^1 + 6^0 = 259 ??? As for unique: is 1,1,2 = 1,2,1 = 2,1,1 or are these unique? If I'm rolling identical dice, I can't distinguish these outcomes. They are not unique in typical gameplaying situations.

### #15 of 31 OFFLINEAl.Anderson

Al.Anderson

Screenwriter

• 2,343 posts
• Join Date: Jul 02 2002
• Real Name:Al

Posted April 11 2007 - 12:57 AM

The "unique" in the orginal question threw me off too. Now that we get the question (which I think is better phrased as non-unique), I think what you want is a Permutation: n!/(n-r)!. Or in this case 6!/(6-3)! = 120.

### #16 of 31 OFFLINEcafink

cafink

Producer

• 3,045 posts
• Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted April 11 2007 - 01:08 AM

Although Mark asked for the number of "unique results" in his original post, he also listed both 112 and 121 in his list, so I imagine that 6^3 is the answer he's looking for.

### #17 of 31 OFFLINESami Kallio

Sami Kallio

Screenwriter

• 1,035 posts
• Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted April 11 2007 - 02:01 AM

As I understood, they are unique. Just like a lock on your suitcase has three numbers you roll and the unique combinations are 10^3. Dice #1 and dice #2 for example are not interchangeable. If they are then 6^3 is not the answer.

### #18 of 31 OFFLINEHaggai

Haggai

Producer

• 3,883 posts
• Join Date: Nov 03 2003

Posted April 11 2007 - 02:36 AM

Yes, if the three dice are distinguishable from each other, the answer is 6^3 = 216.

If the dice are NOT distinguishable, i.e. if the outcomes of 112 and 121 and 211 are all considered to be the same, then you need to account for those repeat possibilities in the right way, which I think can be done as follows:

EDIT: Screwed this up the first time. Corrections below.

In the total of 216, multiple-counting of the same possibility can happen in two different ways.

One is if two different numbers show up on the three dice, e.g. the 112/121/211 possibility mentioned before. We also have to take into account the 122/212/221 option here, since we are classifying this as "what if the numbers 1 and 2 are the only ones that appear." As we can see from this example, this will result in one possibility counting six times (in the 216 total), when we only want it to count twice.

The other type of multiple counting is if three different numbers show up on the three dice, e.g. 123/132/213/231/312/321. This will result in a sextuple counting, when we only want it to count once.

So the multiple counted possibilities that we want to throw away are:

"6 choose 2" (binomial coefficient) ways of getting two different numbers, each of which contributes 4 excess possibilities (e.g. we'll keep 112 and 122, but we want to discard 121/211 and 212/221).

"6 choose 3" ways of getting three different numbers, each of which contributes 5 excess possibilities (e.g. we'll keep 123, but discard the other 5 permutations)

The total we want then turns out to be (see the link above for how to calculate the binomial coefficient):

6^3 - (6 choose 2)*4 - (6 choose 3)*5 = 216 - 15*4 - 20*5 = 56.

### #19 of 31 OFFLINEMark Giles

Mark Giles

Second Unit

• 272 posts
• Join Date: Aug 30 2002

Posted April 11 2007 - 06:01 AM

Ok, I'm sorry about the confusion in the beginning. 112 and 121 shoudnt be counted twice. So 216 isnt correct. I'll take some time and let your formula sink in Haggai. Thanks a lot for the breakdown!

### #20 of 31 OFFLINESami Kallio

Sami Kallio

Screenwriter

• 1,035 posts
• Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted April 11 2007 - 06:18 AM

In that case Al's solution is correct, which is basically the same as 6*5*4 = 120 For the six dice you get 6! = 720

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users