Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

The Mummy 3 (June 11 2008)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
85 replies to this topic

#1 of 86 DavidPla

DavidPla

    Screenwriter

  • 2,357 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 15 2004

Posted February 10 2007 - 05:11 AM

Rob Cohen (The Fast and the Furious, Stealth) is set to direct with Brendan Fraser returning. Universal has even set a release date for next summer, June 11 2008.

Monsters with Hellboy, The Mummy and The Wolf Man all in the same year!

#2 of 86 Chris Atkins

Chris Atkins

    Producer

  • 3,887 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002

Posted February 10 2007 - 11:27 AM

Liked the first one okay. Thought the second was really bad (with some of the worst effects I've ever seen).

Will take a miracle to get me in the theater for this...will probably prefer to go see Indiana Jones again. Posted Image

#3 of 86 ThomasC

ThomasC

    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted February 10 2007 - 02:27 PM

I thought the sequel was a lot more fun than the first movie. I'll probably check it out on DVD unless it gets decent reviews.

#4 of 86 Rakesh.S

Rakesh.S

    Second Unit

  • 455 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 17 2002

Posted February 11 2007 - 04:46 AM

the first one was just okay and the second one sucked...

both movies, honestly, were pretty boring. They tried to create a modern day indiana jones and failed miserably.

#5 of 86 Michael:M

Michael:M

    Supporting Actor

  • 530 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 27 2006

Posted February 11 2007 - 05:01 AM

I really like the first movie - it sure ain't perfect, but I thought it did a good job balancing a lot of elements. Weisz and Fraser have great chemistry, and I liked O'Connell, despite his being an Indiana Jones knockoff.

The second movie....I own it, but only watch the scene where Imhotep is raised, and the very end. I just thought it was dumb, and hated a lot of the plot points.

I think a third film could be really good, but it would take great writing to make it so. O'Connell as a widower (I originally read Weisz was done doing these films) in his late 40s or 50s, his son a young man...potential for some great pulp action there, but only if done well. In some ways, Sommers being gone is good...but Rob Cohen? Eh. This is a case when some experienced producers could really help instead of hurt a project. I don't have much hope for something good.
"Life began in mystery, and it will end in mystery, but what a savage and beautiful country lies in between." - Diane Ackerman

#6 of 86 Robert James Clark

Robert James Clark

    Second Unit

  • 352 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 25 2001

Posted February 11 2007 - 05:06 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakesh.S
the first one was just okay and the second one sucked...

both movies, honestly, were pretty boring. They tried to create a modern day indiana jones and failed miserably.


Except that it wasn't modern day... Posted Image


My wifes favorite movies so I'm going regardless...

#7 of 86 David Williams

David Williams

    Screenwriter

  • 2,290 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted February 11 2007 - 05:25 AM

I really enjoyed both films right up until the Scorpion King makes his appearance. Woof, that's bad CGI. I do hope they can talk Weisz into making another film, as Evie is a great character.
"Only two things are infinite––the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not so sure about the universe." ––Albert Einstein

#8 of 86 Josh.C

Josh.C

    Second Unit

  • 469 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 20 2005

Posted February 11 2007 - 07:03 AM

I didn't mind the mummy series, and actually remember being quite impressed after seing the first one, in the theater. The next was not near as good, and the Scorpion King was just overkill.

I think it was a nice little teaser while all of us waited, and waited, and waited................and waited (yeah, I think you get the point) for IJ4 to come out, after being rumored to happen for years now.

Now that IJ4 has been announced, I doubt the Mummy part 3 will get much love. When put head to head with Indiana Jones, there is little comparison on which is better.

That said, this series may do a little better with younger kids, so it just might find an audience.

JC

#9 of 86 Joe Karlosi

Joe Karlosi

    Producer

  • 5,994 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 05 2003

Posted February 11 2007 - 07:21 AM

I thought the first two both sucked, so I won't be seeing the third.

#10 of 86 Will_B

Will_B

    Producer

  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted February 11 2007 - 07:40 PM

Encino Man can do no wrong, and I'll watch the third. I liked both the first and second of the Mummy films. More lighthearted than the Indiana Jones movies.
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#11 of 86 Radioman970

Radioman970

    Producer

  • 5,643 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2006
  • Real Name:James Perry
  • LocationCould be anywhere

Posted February 11 2007 - 10:44 PM

Mummy-revived a classic monster with enough action, special effects and adventure for this movie goer to have a good time. Posted Image Posted Image Loved the anti-Ripley "damsel in distress" and token slimy-guy. Posted Image

Mummy Returns-more? Well, okay. I gave it a try after everybody said it sucked. I disliked the fact that they turned the damsel into Ripley-lite. What a disappointment! And the kid was hard to take but I got used to him. However, unlike so many, I loved all the effects. I mean, this is just a monster movie....every piece of cgi doesn't have to be perfectly placed. I thought everything looked pretty good. Although my enjoyment for these flicks is elevated thanks to my love for the Xena and Hercules TV series.

Mummy 3-??? this should be the first I see in the cinema. I'm wondering if they can bring anything new to this idea. At least the sequel to Bubba Ho-tep will be Bruce against vamps. The film doesn't have to be called "Mummy something" does it? I predict it'll just be more of the same with better visual effects. At least the Indy movies tried for new things each time. In fact, I'll go out on a limb Posted Image and predict that Indy will kick Mummy 3's saggy bandaged butt across the desert.
Silly Party Candidate:  Tarquin Fin- tim- lim- bim- whin- bim- lim- bus- stop- F'tang- F'tang- Olè- Biscuitbarrel

 


#12 of 86 Chris Roberts

Chris Roberts

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 223 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 07 2004

Posted February 12 2007 - 03:13 AM

I really enjoyed the first one. I'm not sure its valid to call it an Indiana Jones ripoff like so many do. Indiana Jones and The Mummy are both influenced by the old serial pulp adventure movies. Different interpretations of the same genre is all. Of course Indy did it better up until Last Crusade which I think is below The Mummy in entertainment value.

The second one had its moments, but wasn't very good overall to me. The bad CGI doesn't bother me so much because I figure its only important that it looks real to the characters in the movie. As long as they look like they see a giant half-scorpion guy that's good enough for me. It was the changes to the characters and lackluster plot with villains who were evil for no apparent reason that I didn't like.

I'm sure I'll rent the third film. But listening to the commentaries on the first two really made me like Sommers as director. He points and laughs at his own mistakes as much as the fans do. Like he intended them to be just fun popcorn movies and not genre-redefining masterpieces.

"Imhotep!"

#13 of 86 Steve Christou

Steve Christou

    Executive Producer

  • 14,160 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2000
  • Real Name:Steve Christou
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted February 12 2007 - 03:54 AM

"No! You must not read from the book!"

I liked both Mummy flicks, I enjoyed their silliness, the Jerry Goldsmith and Alan Silvestri music scores, the variable visual effects, the over-the-top characters and Patricia Valasquez walk thru the temple, so yeah I'll be queueing up for Mummy III next year. Posted Image

Dave hören... auf, wille stoppen sie Dave... stoppen sie Dave... Mein gehirn geht... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin ängstlich Dave... Guter Nachmittag. Ich bin ein HAL 9000 computer. Ich wurde funktionsfähig am HAL-Betrieb in Urbana, Illinois auf January 12 1992.


Lord of the Hubs


#14 of 86 Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer

  • 4,734 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted February 12 2007 - 04:26 AM

I enjoyed both of the Mummy pictures, not to the level of an Indiana Jones picture, but there's still plenty of fun to be had at them. Not many modern movies offer the style, dashing and adventure found in those movies anymore. I hope they go ahead with M3 and get Fraser and Oscar-winner Weisz on board.

#15 of 86 TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,434 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted February 12 2007 - 06:24 AM

Arnold Vosloo was on a commentary track on 24: Season Four and he mentioned they were talking about doing a third Mummy movie and since it had been quite awhile since the first two, I thought he was nuts. Imhotep proved my ass wrong. Posted Image

#16 of 86 Chris Roberts

Chris Roberts

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 223 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 07 2004

Posted February 12 2007 - 08:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
Arnold Vosloo was on a commentary track on 24: Season Four and he mentioned they were talking about doing a third Mummy movie and since it had been quite awhile since the first two, I thought he was nuts. Imhotep proved my ass wrong. Posted Image

How about a different mummy this time? No offense to Mr. Vosloo.

#17 of 86 DavidPla

DavidPla

    Screenwriter

  • 2,357 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 15 2004

Posted February 12 2007 - 09:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Roberts
How about a different mummy this time? No offense to Mr. Vosloo.

Wasn't that the direction of this film? I'm not sure if they are still going with the same script, but a recent script review revealed that it would be a Chinese Mummy with Rick and his son, who's all grown up now, on an adventure.

EDIT: Here's the script review in question. Wonder if this will be the one they're going ahead with.
http://www.iesb.net/...iews/mummy3.php

#18 of 86 TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,434 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted February 12 2007 - 10:00 AM

That commentary was recorded nearly two years ago so Vosloo may not be in the movie at all.

#19 of 86 Jerome Grate

Jerome Grate

    Screenwriter

  • 2,931 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 1999

Posted February 20 2007 - 07:06 AM

One of the few who's a fan of both films, for me great joy ride. But, wouldn't go to the movies for this one, DVD purchase for me at the right time unless the reviews change my mind.
Listen Up People.., Rack Em and Pack Em.., We're Phantoms in 15.

#20 of 86 todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor

  • 6,854 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted April 12 2007 - 05:39 AM

Brendan Fraser has signed on...

Quote:



Fraser Signs For Mummy 3

Brendan Fraser has closed a deal to return in The Mummy 3, but Rachel Weisz is not coming back, Variety reported.

Rob Cohen will direct the sequel, which is expected to begin production late in the summer. It will be set in China and will introduce Jet Li as a villain.

Universal is planning a summer 2008 release; the franchise has earned more than $830 million worldwide. The Mummy debuted in 1999 and The Mummy Returns in 2001.

Weisz has won an Oscar and had a baby since the last installment and has dropped out of talks to reprise her role.

The Mummy 3's script is by Smallville creators Miles Millar and Alfred Gough, who will do another pass that will factor in the absence of Weisz. Universal is holding up a green light pending a final rewrite, but a late summer start date is still expected.

Link http://www.scifi.com....ory=0&id=41051
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.


Back to Movies (Theatrical)



Forum Nav Content I Follow