Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Blu-ray Disc vs HD DVD on amazon.co.jp


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 of 24 OFFLINE   MarekM

MarekM

    Supporting Actor



  • 858 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2006

Posted January 26 2007 - 10:34 PM

interesting table, similair to dvdwars (http://www.eproductwars.com/dvd/) table on japan amazon site...

http://nolist.jp/bdvshddvd/


average ranking

Blu-ray - 609.1
HD DVD - 3672.3

number of titles
Blu-ray - 40
HD DVD - 53

Marek

#2 of 24 OFFLINE   Sam Davatchi

Sam Davatchi

    Producer



  • 3,151 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1999

Posted January 26 2007 - 10:58 PM

Aren't they supposed to be Blu-ray friendly in Japan?

#3 of 24 OFFLINE   Marc Colella

Marc Colella

    Screenwriter



  • 2,607 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 1999

Posted January 27 2007 - 02:40 AM

Funny how Amazon sales ranks mean more when Blu-Ray is ranked higher. Posted Image

It's Japan so the results are not surprising.

I see even Japan isn't really embracing HD formats that much. It's funny to see companies battling tooth and nail over a market that will most likely be a niche.

#4 of 24 Guest_Chris*Liberti_*

Guest_Chris*Liberti_*
  • Join Date: --

Posted January 30 2007 - 07:25 AM

A niche was still making studios quite a bit of money in the days of the laserdisc. I hope Blu-Ray becomes the videophile format and HD-DVD for J6P.

#5 of 24 OFFLINE   ChristopherG

ChristopherG

    Screenwriter



  • 1,631 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2003
  • Real Name:Chris

Posted January 30 2007 - 07:34 AM


Like betamax was to VHS?

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
It takes 52 pounds of pressure to rupture an eyeball... :blink:

#6 of 24 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,032 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted January 30 2007 - 10:19 AM

Nope, like Laserdisc to VHS is more likely what he meant. And I'd be okay with that. Mass market acceptance has led to some bad things for DVD (sub-par transfers, non-OAR transfers, etc.). Laserdisc had tons of titles out for it, and if BD could become a bit more successful than LD, but not mass market, I think I'd be okay with that.

XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#7 of 24 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,830 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted January 30 2007 - 10:28 AM

Most BD releases now seemt to be as good (PQ-wise, many audio-wise too) as their HD DVD equivalent. But becoming a "videophile" format while HD DVD goes to attract J6P? At the moment, I choose the HD DVD version if there's a choice. Some people will choose the other way. But this "hope" is ... weird! Cees

#8 of 24 OFFLINE   Manus

Manus

    Second Unit



  • 411 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 06 2002

Posted January 30 2007 - 10:43 AM

" Some people will choose the other way. But this "hope" is ... weird!

I feel the same way too. There's nothing more depressing than the apparent disregard for or ignorance of the Drm or BD+ involved in Bluray and yet people seem to want to bury the format that doesnt include these ugly inventions in favour of a format whose hardware and software usually costs more Posted Image

Think I'll take some time out to revisit my Hitchcock Collection for a break Posted Image

~M~
I have just two words to say to you..... Shut the f*** up !

#9 of 24 OFFLINE   Shane Martin

Shane Martin

    Producer



  • 6,017 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 1999

Posted January 30 2007 - 10:53 AM

The opposite is more possible given how the PS3 has been adopted. I personally hope they remain niche because you know J6p is already complaining about seeing black bars on their new HDTV. P&S to 16x9 is coming, it's a matter of time.

#10 of 24 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,032 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted January 30 2007 - 02:20 PM

Thanks for raining on my parade, Shane...

It only hurts because it's true Posted Image

XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#11 of 24 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,062 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted January 30 2007 - 02:28 PM

I know this is a possibility but really how many SD releases are only available pan and scan? Yeah, one is too many but it's not like a P&S release is particularly common and I doubt it will be a major problem for what is likely to be a niche format for a number of years ahead.

#12 of 24 OFFLINE   ppltd

ppltd

    Producer



  • 3,044 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 30 2006

Posted January 30 2007 - 03:35 PM

We are currently experiencing the opposite of Pan and Scan. I find almost all of my friends who own 16x9 displays will stretch a 4x3 image to the 16x9 format, distorting the image. It drives me nuts that they can not adjust to pillar bars of 4x3 content. It is nearly as bad as Pan and Scan releases... And then there are the HD stations (TNT anyone) who believe that if they broadcast a 4x3 image, they must broadcast it in a stretched version.
Thomas Eisenmann(Last updated 09/30/11)

Blu-Ray Collection  DVD Collection, Numerous BD players,

LG 55LX6500 55-Inch 3D 1080p 240 Hz LED

Pioneer VSX-94TXH, Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D 1080p (PT-AE8000 Just Ordered, 

1124 BDs and going up, 1028 - DVDs and going down.


#13 of 24 OFFLINE   Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor



  • 7,716 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted January 30 2007 - 05:00 PM

I thought we weren't supposed to give any credence to Amazon's numbers? Posted Image...Posted Image

#14 of 24 OFFLINE   Kareem

Kareem

    Auditioning



  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 2003

Posted January 30 2007 - 07:02 PM

Wouldn't it be great if every release came as OAR and the hardware would zoom+P&S on the fly for those who wanted it? If only...

#15 of 24 OFFLINE   PeterTHX

PeterTHX

    Screenwriter



  • 2,034 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2002

Posted January 30 2007 - 07:49 PM


Well yeah, now that Blu-ray is "winning" Posted Image

http://www.eproductwars.com/dvd/

Actual sales numbers (via www.dvdempire.com )
Percentage of total
Hi-Def sales:
HD-DVD Blu-Ray

Week: 42.79% 57.21%
Month:44.70% 55.30%
Year: 44.70% 55.30%

#16 of 24 OFFLINE   MarekM

MarekM

    Supporting Actor



  • 858 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2006

Posted January 30 2007 - 08:13 PM

Thanx Peter, I almost forgot about dvdempire stats... Marek

#17 of 24 OFFLINE   Jesse Blacklow

Jesse Blacklow

    Screenwriter



  • 2,049 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 14 2002

Posted January 31 2007 - 02:37 AM

I've never understood this argument. The most egregious offenses (i.e. the stuff that people are moaning over) are all contained within AACS. The only thing I've heard BD+ does is change keys on an individual basis, rather than for all players or models.
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Um...easy, both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me."
--Michael Scott, The Office

"When I get sad I just stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story."
--Barney Stinson, How I Met Your Mother

#18 of 24 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,830 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted February 04 2007 - 06:06 AM

BD+ is a layer on top of AACS, that makes the player play some code (a program or script if you wish) from the individual disc. It's an extra layer of the Blu-ray DRM system. It can be anything, therefore. Even something you certainly want to happen inside your player. It will instruct the player how to decode the data on the disc, but it can do much more, you simply don't know what a given disc will do. One, currently extreme, possibility would be to make a connection over the internet, if the player is so connected, and interchange some data. Of course, the script could also be buggy (or being executed after been mis-read by the player). For that reason, some people compare it to a version of a DRM system used by Sony BMG for a short time (on CD). That one was really bad, of course, when it lead to a stealthy installation on your PC of a rootkit-like construct. No-one thinks this "disaster" will easily be repeated soon in any form on Blu-ray discs, but in essence the whole concept of a BD+ layer is something any consumer should oppose to strongly, IMO - and at least be very much aware of. Cees

#19 of 24 OFFLINE   ChristopherG

ChristopherG

    Screenwriter



  • 1,631 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2003
  • Real Name:Chris

Posted February 04 2007 - 07:45 AM

Cees - I couldn't agree more strongly with this sentiment, well said.
It takes 52 pounds of pressure to rupture an eyeball... :blink:

#20 of 24 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,830 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted February 04 2007 - 10:21 AM

Cees




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users