-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

intersting news on LOTR status...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
98 replies to this topic

#1 of 99 OFFLINE   MarekM

MarekM

    Supporting Actor

  • 858 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2006

Posted January 17 2007 - 09:55 PM

original
"Lord of the Rings HD DVD/Blu-ray details trickling out"
http://hd-insider.co....kling-out.aspx

============================================

seems like double dipping from NewLine Posted Image only theatrical versions now..

Quote:
- Main feature will be a single DL disc on both HD DVD and Blu-ray. (no word if it will be a TotalHD disc)
- The movies will be the Theatrical Versions of each film. Yes you heard it right.
- Both discs will be encoded using VC1
- These will be the first titles to use Dolby TrueHD 7.1 Audio *crosses fingers for 24bit*
- Due to bandwidth constraints, as of now there will be no IME like features.


#2 of 99 OFFLINE   Brent T

Brent T

    Second Unit

  • 279 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2004

Posted January 18 2007 - 12:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarekM
original
"Lord of the Rings HD DVD/Blu-ray details trickling out"
http://hd-insider.co....kling-out.aspx

============================================

seems like double dipping from NewLine Posted Image only theatrical versions now..

Theatrical versions ??? Ughhh, I will have to pass Posted Image

#3 of 99 OFFLINE   Sam Davatchi

Sam Davatchi

    Producer

  • 3,151 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1999

Posted January 18 2007 - 12:34 AM

Quote:
only theatrical versions now..
No sale.

#4 of 99 OFFLINE   Paul Arnette

Paul Arnette

    Screenwriter

  • 2,616 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2002

Posted January 18 2007 - 01:14 AM

In some instances I actually like the theatrical versions better than the extended ones, especially where FOTR is concerned. However, being forced to buy a Total HD disc and the lack of interactive features like IME make this release a huge let-down. Posted Image
Universal Blu-ray Discs I will not be buying while they're offered only as Blu-ray + DVD 'flipper' discs:

The Jackal
, Out of Africa, and Traffic.

#5 of 99 OFFLINE   Peter Overduin

Peter Overduin

    Supporting Actor

  • 781 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 18 2007 - 01:17 AM

One of those rare times when I would heartily endorse a mass email/phone/letter harrassment of a studio. This is nothing less than blatant gouging of the customer. New Line no doubt wanting to milk as much as they can to pay Peter Jackson. What a disgrace.
Peter

My Collection

#6 of 99 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Studio Mogul

  • 24,702 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted January 18 2007 - 01:28 AM

I will not buy this release.

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#7 of 99 ONLINE   TonyD

TonyD

    Executive Producer

  • 16,166 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted January 18 2007 - 02:30 AM

i wont buy if this is true.

extended cut only.
facebook.com/whotony

#8 of 99 OFFLINE   Mark Zimmer

Mark Zimmer

    Producer

  • 4,267 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 18 2007 - 02:30 AM

I prefer TTT in the theatrical version, but the extended versions of the other two. So I'll at least pick up that one.

#9 of 99 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,038 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:08 AM

I'm surprised at the response I see here. I think that Fellowship of the Rings and Return of the King are much stronger movies in their theatrical form, and The Two Towers is only slightly weaker. I also think that having the originally released version of each film is important for the sake of posterity. These films have become an important part of our culture, and I, for one, would like to own the versions of the films that originally won over audiences, irrespective of which version is "better."

I would, of course, like to see the extended editions released as well, but I'm just relieved to see that The Lord of the Rings isn't going to be one of those films whose HD release does not include the original verison.

It's a must-buy for me.
 

 


#10 of 99 OFFLINE   BrettB

BrettB

    Producer

  • 3,024 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2001

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:16 AM

Quote:
Due to bandwidth constraints, as of now there will be no IME like features.

30's enough. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

As to the differing versions. Does anyone know if the seamless branching is better on the new hd formats? I would assume it would be. If so, given the room, that would be the way to go.

#11 of 99 OFFLINE   ppltd

ppltd

    Producer

  • 3,044 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 30 2006

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:25 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrettB
30's enough. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
For a film under 3 hours, there should be no issues with 30GB. I am assumming that is what you were implying.
Thomas Eisenmann(Last updated 09/30/11)

Blu-Ray Collection  DVD Collection, Numerous BD players,

LG 55LX6500 55-Inch 3D 1080p 240 Hz LED

Pioneer VSX-94TXH, Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D 1080p (PT-AE8000 Just Ordered, 

1124 BDs and going up, 1028 - DVDs and going down.


#12 of 99 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,038 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:30 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrettB
As to the differing versions. Does anyone know if the seamless branching is better on the new hd formats? I would assume it would be. If so, given the room, that would be the way to go.

The only problem I have with this plan is that the extended editions (Return of the King in particular) are probably long enough that they'd have to be split across two discs, while the theatrical versions may fit on one. If that is indeed the case, then utilizing seamless branching means introducing an unnecessary break in the theatrical version. The recently-released seamlessly-branched standard DVD release of the trilogy suffered the same problem, which is why I'm glad to own the original separate DVD releases of both the theatrical versions and the extended editions.
 

 


#13 of 99 OFFLINE   KurtEP

KurtEP

    Supporting Actor

  • 698 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2006

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:30 AM

I'll probably Netflix this, but there's no way I'll buy it, even if it's the only release in HD. I found the extended version to be much better, and already own those in SD.

Also, as far as the 30GB thing goes, is there some sort of rule saying that you can't have a double disk set? This wouldn't bother me at all with extras.
Lay down your law books now, they're no damned good -- The Eagles

#14 of 99 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer

  • 3,038 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ppltd
For a film under 3 hours, there should be no issues with 30GB. I am assumming that is what you were implying.

But the first two Lord of the Rings films are under three hours, and they apparently do have issues with 30GB, as features are being left off because of space considerations.
 

 


#15 of 99 OFFLINE   hakstone

hakstone

    Auditioning

  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 01 2006

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:32 AM

How are you going to process 7.1 when the players are only 5.1 ?

#16 of 99 OFFLINE   Rolando

Rolando

    Screenwriter

  • 1,318 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 19 2001

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:39 AM

well I actually have both the OTC 2 disc and Extended 4 disc of each. Just a completist I guess. I like to watch the OTC once a year and then the EC later that year to remember the differences.

So that being said I would buy these IF there is a second disc (even SD) will all the features on the 2 disc to completely replace my OTC 2 disc DVD.

If not, no sale and I will just wait for the Extended cut on HD-DVD. I would get the Blu-Ray in a heartbeat if they did a different master/transfer/re-author to take full advantage of BD. However paying extra for a BD that has same file as the HD-DVD that is about $10 cheaper is an insult.
Rolando Avendano

My Collection

#17 of 99 OFFLINE   Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor

  • 7,661 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:52 AM

Well I love LOTR like most of you and am glad New Line is finally doing something but will pass on these. For me, the EE's are FAR superior in nearly every way possible. I haven't watched the theatrical cut since the EE's came out. I've waited this long and will continue to wait I guess. Dangit!

Looks like I'll be doing the upconversion thingy on my A1. Posted Image

If space is an issue, then with BD's available 50g? disc then it should be ok?

#18 of 99 OFFLINE   Stephen Brooks

Stephen Brooks

    Second Unit

  • 347 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 19 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen
  • LocationBrownsburg, IN

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:55 AM

I really hope that relations between Jackson and New Line don't become so bad that it prevents Jackson from ever contributing to future home video releases of Rings.
IMPERIAL OFFICER: Lord Vader, I can't find the Central Navigational Network!

VADER (points to control panel): This......is CNN.

#19 of 99 OFFLINE   Michael Boyd

Michael Boyd

    Second Unit

  • 278 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 19 2000

Posted January 18 2007 - 03:59 AM

Seems like everyday there is some bit of news that makes me less and less excited about HD DVD.
Michael Boyd

Currently enjoying movies in China via itunes on a 13 inch Macbook.

#20 of 99 OFFLINE   Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor

  • 7,661 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted January 18 2007 - 04:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Boyd
Seems like everyday there is some bit of news that makes me less and less excited about HD DVD.


To be fair, this decision for the theatrical cut is for Blu Ray as well. Not just HD-DVD. Posted Image


Back to Blu-ray



Forum Nav Content I Follow