Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

A REVIEW! Insignia IS-HC040917 receiver from Best Buy

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic

#1 of 8 OFFLINE   Seth=L



  • 1,313 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2006

Posted December 13 2006 - 05:38 AM

Well first the good news. I got the receiver earlier than expected and was able to review it sooner for those who might like to get one for x-mas. I applied for Best Buy's credit card and I got it, yea! So I used the credit card knowing that I wouldn't likely keep this receiver as I was only wanting to review it. So on with the review. I has all the makings of a good receiver, good power supply (toroid), decent caps (10,000uF Topcoms), and nice output devices (Toshiba). Now to crap on the parade. The auto-protect is way to sensitive or this is just a poorly integrated piece of equipment. My Magnavox receiver with crap power supply, puny 4700uF caps and the cheapest IC output decice ever concieved would walk all over the Insignia in output. It does have a hiss, but it is not very bad. You have to stick your ear up to the speakers to hear it. And when you adjust the volume it does make a clicking noise, but I have had lower end Onkyo receivers that have louder clicks. It sounds good at lower volumes and it sounds good when you turn it up. The only thing that may distract you is when the amp turns on and off while you are playing music at what I consider slightly above easy listening levels. For fun I took the unit apart after I was playing it at above easy listening levels. There are fans on the bottom of the heatsink, they never turned on. I checked the tranistors for heat, they were not hot they were barely warm. My personal recomendation, DO NOT BUY THIS RECEIVER! It isn't even worth the money.

#2 of 8 OFFLINE   John Brill

John Brill

    Supporting Actor

  • 519 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 03 2003

Posted December 13 2006 - 06:43 AM

Strangely, I'm left hollow after this review... No "I told you so" moments and the only problem seems to be an odd protect mode feature/problem that may be isolated to this individual receiver. Will you ask for an exchange to test out that theory?

I was hoping you'd say things like video switching doesn't work, or at best degrades your picture. RCA jacks for coaxial inputs, though a cheap workaround, doesn't provide a tight enough fit. AM/FM tuner performs worse than basic walkman. Stuff like that...

Since BB has a 30 day return policy, why not "borrow" a high-end receiver every month until HDMI 1.3 come out Posted Image

#3 of 8 OFFLINE   John Garcia

John Garcia

    Executive Producer

  • 11,556 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 1999
  • Real Name:John
  • LocationNorCal

Posted December 13 2006 - 07:24 AM

I TOLD YOU SO!! Posted Image J/K. All I have to say is, I didn't expect much from the receiver, but thanks for the review anyway, just for confirmation. So with what sounds like at least some decent components, what exactly is it that is making this thing such a POS? Bad output stage? El-cheapo amps? I suppose it doesn't really matter....
HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, Carnegie Acoustics CSB-1s + CSC-1, GR Research A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-105, PS4, PS3,URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100 Bluejeans Cable
System Two: Marantz PM7200, Pioneer FS52s, Panasonic BD79
(stolen) : Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G)

Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it’ll spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.” – Albert Einstein


#4 of 8 OFFLINE   Seth=L



  • 1,313 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2006

Posted December 13 2006 - 11:09 AM

Quality control is important.Posted Image

I am using a Fisher integrated amplifier I got for $25 from a pawn shop. It has wattage output meters. I turned it up to about the same level that I had the Insignia and the meters wear registering around 3-5 watts RMS. The Insignia craps out with even moderate demands, pathetic.Posted Image

#5 of 8 OFFLINE   DaveHo


    Supporting Actor

  • 605 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001

Posted December 14 2006 - 01:48 AM

As crappy as it may be, I'm skeptical that it would perform that badly. Sounds like a short across the speaker terminals. Did you check for that?

#6 of 8 OFFLINE   Seth=L



  • 1,313 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2006

Posted December 14 2006 - 03:53 AM

No I didn't, and that is very possible considering the way I had it set up. Maybe I will try it again. I may wait till after Christmas though.

#7 of 8 OFFLINE   Wayne Ernst

Wayne Ernst


  • 2,589 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2002

Posted December 14 2006 - 07:07 AM

Seth, does that mean you've already returned it, or had to wrap it up and put it under the tree? Thanks for the review. I've watched your threads on this leading up to the review and was looking forwad to the results.
"My reality check ... just bounced"

#8 of 8 OFFLINE   Seth=L



  • 1,313 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2006

Posted December 16 2006 - 05:10 AM

Yes I returned it. I may have to get it again and review it again since there is no way for me to be sure that I was the problem. I would like to wait till after Christmas, unless you guys can convince me to do otherwise.Posted Image