-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Wizard of Oz?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
22 replies to this topic

#1 of 23 Camper

Camper

    Second Unit

  • 347 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 29 2006

Posted December 06 2006 - 02:38 AM

Which company holds the right to Wizard.. in hi-def.
And what format does that company belong to HD-DVD, blu-ray or both?
Thanks.

#2 of 23 Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter

  • 2,070 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted December 06 2006 - 02:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camper
Which company holds the right to Wizard.. in hi-def.
And what format does that company belong to HD-DVD, blu-ray or both?
Thanks.
Warner. Both.

#3 of 23 Camper

Camper

    Second Unit

  • 347 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 29 2006

Posted December 06 2006 - 05:45 AM

Timely and to the point--thanks very much
want to watch that with the wife & kids in high def!

#4 of 23 Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor

  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted December 06 2006 - 08:29 AM

I was really hoping/expecting we were going to see this by the end of the year, but I guess Warner is done now for '06.
Wonder what the first classic release will be for '07?

#5 of 23 AaronSCH

AaronSCH

    Second Unit

  • 284 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 10 2006

Posted December 06 2006 - 04:45 PM

The "Wizard of OZ" was listed in an earlier announced list of HD DVD titles. I think it is fair to say we will see it in '07.

#6 of 23 Scott Calvert

Scott Calvert

    Supporting Actor

  • 885 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 02 1998

Posted December 07 2006 - 11:15 AM

Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind and Ben-Hur have been rumored for HD-DVD release so I'm hoping we will see them in Q1 07.

#7 of 23 dpippel

dpippel

    Producer

  • 3,169 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted December 07 2006 - 02:27 PM

I'm drooling over the prospect of seeing all three of these titles on HD-DVD. Bring 'em ON! My wallet is greased and waiting.

Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#8 of 23 Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor

  • 7,658 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted December 07 2006 - 04:12 PM

Amen!

#9 of 23 Camper

Camper

    Second Unit

  • 347 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 29 2006

Posted December 09 2006 - 08:41 AM

How does one know if a title belongs to Warner or MGM?

Haven't various titles jumped back and forth--what about Logan's Run? Etc.

#10 of 23 Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor

  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted December 10 2006 - 12:26 AM

Warner now owns/controls all MGM produced product prior to a certain date (I can't remember the date, it may be mid '80s)
MGM still owns United Artist produced product (which includes things like Rocky, Bond, etc) and titles that were made under the MGM banner after a certain date.
all the classic MGM movies, and even going into the 70's, are all under Warner now

#11 of 23 Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter

  • 2,070 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted December 10 2006 - 03:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
Warner now owns/controls all MGM produced product prior to a certain date (I can't remember the date, it may be mid '80s)
1986. I believe the cutoff movie is Spaceballs.

#12 of 23 DeeF

DeeF

    Screenwriter

  • 1,676 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted December 11 2006 - 12:46 PM

The Wizard of Oz is on TNT tonight, in high-def (1080i).

Hmm, very grainy.

#13 of 23 Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter

  • 2,070 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeF
The Wizard of Oz is on TNT tonight, in high-def (1080i).

Hmm, very grainy.
Its been pointed out in the SD 4-Disc dvd thread how grainy the transfer was. It wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't the same except at a higher bit rate.

#14 of 23 DeeF

DeeF

    Screenwriter

  • 1,676 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:21 PM

Yes, I know. The mosquito noise just seems worse, somehow, in this high-def feed.

#15 of 23 RobertR

RobertR

    Lead Actor

  • 9,496 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:28 PM

Quote:
he Wizard of Oz is on TNT tonight, in high-def (1080i).

Hmm, very grainy.
Its been pointed out in the SD 4-Disc dvd thread how grainy the transfer was. It wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't the same except at a higher bit rate.
I've never read anything that says the grain isn't film grain. There would be no good reason to find natural film grain objectionable. I'd hate to see the film have such grain digitized away.

#16 of 23 DeeF

DeeF

    Screenwriter

  • 1,676 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:37 PM

I'm not against grain at all. Perhaps I shouldn't have said "grainy." What I meant was... noisy.

The Wizard of Oz, in this high-def broadcast, doesn't look very pristine, for whatever reason. My HD-DVD of The Adventures of Robin Hood is older than TWOO, but looks more beautiful, to me.

#17 of 23 Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor

  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:38 PM

I didn't watch the UR release, other than to spot check a few scenes, before I sold it off. But the opening Sepia sequences were still very grainy. just like the earlier release. I had thought that the grain on that first release might have been some kind of artifacting, but it evidently was intrinsic to the source. Once the color sequences start it seemed that grain structure was a lot finer.

FWIW, I was never all that impressed with the SD of Robin Hood. I expected a much sharper picture. After getting used to the sd disc, the HD DVD prperly blew me away. I thought Wizard in comparision, looked better, so I would expect the HD DVD to be quite a looker (though parts will always be noisy/grainy)

#18 of 23 DeeF

DeeF

    Screenwriter

  • 1,676 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted December 11 2006 - 01:42 PM

Maybe the Technicolor negatives were in better shape than the opening sequence negatives. Maybe the opening sequences were down a generation, or something.

#19 of 23 Roger Rollins

Roger Rollins

    Supporting Actor

  • 931 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2001

Posted December 11 2006 - 02:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul_Scott
Warner now owns/controls all MGM produced product prior to a certain date (I can't remember the date, it may be mid '80s)
MGM still owns United Artist produced product (which includes things like Rocky, Bond, etc) and titles that were made under the MGM banner after a certain date.
all the classic MGM movies, and even going into the 70's, are all under Warner now

Paul's got it right.

I think the last MGM movie that Warner owns is 9 1/2 Weeks, which came out in early 1986.

The earliest MGM movies owned by the "current" MGM (if you want to call it that...) seem to be things like POLTERGEIST 2 (which came out in summer of '86, if I recall correctly) and SPACEBALLS (which followed about a year later).


As to OZ and its "sepia"/B&W opening & closing, I have read often that the original negative to these portions no longer exist. Perhaps they perished in the legendary and tragic fire at George Eastman House back in the '70s.

#20 of 23 Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Studio Mogul

  • 24,513 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted December 11 2006 - 03:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeF
I'm not against grain at all. Perhaps I shouldn't have said "grainy." What I meant was... noisy.

The Wizard of Oz, in this high-def broadcast, doesn't look very pristine, for whatever reason. My HD-DVD of The Adventures of Robin Hood is older than TWOO, but looks more beautiful, to me.
Two different presenting formats is not a fair comparison because we don't know about the condition of the film sources that were used for the former. Also, the two films are less than a year or less apart as to when they were filmed so I wouldn't see how being older plays into this argument.

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 



Back to Blu-ray



Forum Nav Content I Follow