Posted September 20 2006 - 09:18 AM
The FOXLINE article:
“She's more confident about her hourglass figure. "I'm curvy — I'm never going to be 5'11' and 120 pounds. But I feel lucky to have what I've got."
Paul Padilla's opening statement:
| “Where? What curves? Judging by the photo, her duct taped breasts? |
Scarlett is a beautiful woman, but curves? She's listed at 5' 11" and only 120 pounds. (Read: will admit to 120 lbs.)”
And what's wrong with being underweight?
Paul's continuing obsession:
“Plenty...loss of bone mass...osteoperosis (sic)..degenerative joint diseases...dental problems...which is precisely what my (sadly misquoted) point was from the beginning. Beautiful as these pictures are, subtract not 10 but 20 pounds and that's what she will look like in person.”
We did not misquote you; you misread the article and the very appealing Miss Scarlett’s comments.
But that’s not important.
New and more pressing business has come up.
JonZ’s thumbnails in post # 37
Jon… would you please join the One Click Chick Forum? We need your unique skills over there.
So, just to be clear here…
Discussions of your personal body mass….BAD
Photos of Scarlett Johansson…..GOOD