Jump to content

Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Lifespan (1974) - mysterious science, immortality and Klaus Kinski...

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic

#1 of 3 R-T-C Tim

R-T-C Tim

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 192 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2006

Posted August 06 2006 - 05:15 AM

Posted Image

Starring Klaus Kinski in a small role, and with a very intellegent and thought provoking plot, Lifespan (1974) is one of the most unique movies ever released. A dark, documentary-like sci-fi film it is almost incomparable to any other picture - too real to be a Herzog/Franco film, too strange to be a neo-realist picture, too dark and action free to be a mainstream film. Seemingly without a target audience, and very hard to promote, the film was almost forgotten upon initial release, but is now available on a good looking DVD from Mondo Macabro, with a good set of bonus features.

Mondo Esoterica Review - http://mondo-esoteri...t/Lifespan.html

Anyone else seen this, and what are your thoughts?
Mondo Esoterica.net - From the Wild West to Gothic Europe...

#2 of 3 Mario Gauci

Mario Gauci


  • 2,201 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 08 2005

Posted August 06 2006 - 06:41 AM

This is my review of the film from the HTF's "2006 Track The Films You Watch" thread in the "Movies" folder:

06/17/06: LIFESPAN (Alexander Whitelaw, 1974) ***

Despite the rather lethargic pace, this is an absorbing conspiracy thriller on an existentialist theme. As it was shot in English, even if most of the voices were eventually re-dubbed at a later stage, Fons Rademakers’ heavy accent makes his dialogue hard to understand at times!

Anyway, many have found Hiram Keller’s inexpressive performance a detriment to the film but I rather liked it (and so, apparently, does director Whitelaw!); the fact that a lot of the exposition is imparted through narration has been criticized as well, but I also thought this worked very well for the film. Much has also been said about the notorious (and oft-censored) bondage scene involving Tina Aumont (well cast here): actually, it’s very discreetly done and pretty short in itself! And though Klaus Kinski doesn’t get to exert his acting muscles a great deal, his Mephistophelean presence adds to the film’s uniquely disquieting aura. Besides, the Amsterdam setting (and Eddy van der Enden’s lugubrious photography of it) is a big plus, as is Terry Riley’s electronic score.

Whitelaw’s rather choppily edited interview and full-length Audio Commentary (moderated by Mondo Macabro’s Peter Tombs) are very interesting: the director explains several points which may not have been very clear and draws attention to the irony which is present in his script. Besides recounting many an amusing anecdote about the production (Kinski turning up on set dressed as a Mexican bandit and Whitelaw having to calmly persuade him that his role of “The Swiss Man” was somewhat different!; Kinski’s minimal dialogue was also the result of his dislike of the script, whereupon whole chunks of lines he was supposed to say were unceremoniously thrown out!) and the censorship problems the film encountered (the director tried to convince the U.K. censors that the bondage scene was relevant to the main theme by arguing that this kinky act highlighted a woman’s breasts which, by storing milk, are themselves a symbol of immortality!). Whitelaw also puts the unresolved and apparently downbeat ending in the context of the film’s theme by saying that a picture about immortality, i.e. the desire that one’s life doesn’t come to an end, could never have a conventional finish as that would mean it was actually embracing death! Interestingly, he mentions too that Roman Polanski (who was a member of the jury where LIFESPAN won an award) had admired the picture a lot – and this was eventually reflected in his own next film, THE TENANT (1976), to which it bears a striking resemblance plot-wise (though itself based on a work of fiction by Roland Topor, of which Whitelaw was completely unaware at the time)!!

P.S. I compliment you for an attractively laid out website and a well-written review.

#3 of 3 Gordon McMurphy

Gordon McMurphy


  • 3,530 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2002

Posted August 06 2006 - 07:19 AM

Wow, this sounds fantastic! I can't believe that I have not heard of it before; I must not have read Kinski's filmography at IMDb carefully enough. Nice one, Tim; cheers! I'll check it out. Thanks for your thoughts, too, Mario.