Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Your opinion on HD DVD viewing on 34" HD WS Sony XBR970


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14 replies to this topic

#1 of 15 OFFLINE   Deke Thorton

Deke Thorton

    Auditioning



  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 05 2006

Posted August 05 2006 - 08:23 AM

x

#2 of 15 OFFLINE   Alf S

Alf S

    Screenwriter



  • 1,437 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 23 2000
  • Real Name:Alfie

Posted August 05 2006 - 03:24 PM

34"?? Nah...wait it out....stick to SD DVD.
WOOSAH!.

 


#3 of 15 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,651 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted August 06 2006 - 07:13 AM

It all depends on the distance you're watching that screen from.


Cees

#4 of 15 OFFLINE   Alf S

Alf S

    Screenwriter



  • 1,437 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 23 2000
  • Real Name:Alfie

Posted August 06 2006 - 02:31 PM

Yup...if your like 2-3 feet away...then MAYBE you would notice differences in SD vs. any form of Hi-Def....beyond that, on a CRT, odds are the diffferences will be slim between SD DVD and Hi-def DVD's.
WOOSAH!.

 


#5 of 15 OFFLINE   Steve Phillips

Steve Phillips

    Screenwriter



  • 1,526 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 18 2002

Posted August 07 2006 - 11:15 AM

You will see the difference when sitting at a normal distance. I do. Big time.

Forget the tape measure and enjoy the huge increase in PQ.

#6 of 15 OFFLINE   Bob_L

Bob_L

    Supporting Actor



  • 893 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2001

Posted August 07 2006 - 12:01 PM

I have an XBR960 (in addition to a front projector). This is truly a reference-quality monitor and I've seen several of them at video production houses around town (which is where I first saw one and knew I had to have it.)

All the chatter about screen size and NOT being able to garner the benefits of HD is a load of misinformation. On the Sony the difference between SD and HD is abundantly evident at any distance from 0-15 feet, easily. Both increased pixel and color resolution is plain to see.

#7 of 15 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,651 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted August 07 2006 - 06:56 PM

Alf S,

What equipment do you have that you based those experiences on?


Cees

#8 of 15 OFFLINE   willyTass

willyTass

    Second Unit



  • 353 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 09 2005

Posted August 07 2006 - 11:00 PM

THE XBR960, at best, can resolve 1440 x1000 thanks to it's super fine pitch tube

The xbr970 has no super fine pitch tube so it's resolution is much lower.

Hd-DVD would look better on the970 (compared) to sd-dvd say due to the abscence of mosquito noise, ringing etc, but it wouldn't be a night and day difference not by a long shot

#9 of 15 OFFLINE   Jason Borchers

Jason Borchers

    Second Unit



  • 437 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 14 2001

Posted August 08 2006 - 09:26 AM

.

#10 of 15 OFFLINE   ChristopherDAC

ChristopherDAC

    Producer



  • 3,729 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2004

Posted August 08 2006 - 11:19 AM

Even with the LG slim-tune 30FS4D, which is not great as HDTVs go, the difference between broadcast HD and broadcast 16:9 SD is clear. It's an increased sensation of realism in the picture, an increase in clarity.

Incidentally, the shadowmask sampling in a tricolour kinescope is not absolute. In other words, if the electron beam is properly focussed, there can be contrast changes smaller than the size of a shadowmask element. They're not as strong, but the overall effect is of a shelf in response at the spatial frequency of the mask combined with a notch right around it, not a complete rolloff.

#11 of 15 OFFLINE   Paul.S

Paul.S

    Producer



  • 3,813 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 29 2000
  • Real Name:Paul
  • LocationHollywood, California

Posted August 09 2006 - 08:06 PM

What happened to the OP?

#12 of 15 OFFLINE   Dave Mack

Dave Mack

    Producer



  • 4,665 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 28 2002

Posted August 10 2006 - 05:21 AM

The XBR 960 is an AMAZING TV.
I rememeber just a few years back when a 4x3 36" set was considered BIG.
The 34" XBR for a WS image has more pic. real estate. And you don't have to be 3 feet away.

Posted Image

#13 of 15 OFFLINE   Michael Boyd

Michael Boyd

    Second Unit



  • 278 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 19 2000

Posted August 10 2006 - 05:24 AM

I've been considering this TV also to jump into the HD-DVD game. It's cheap. It sounds reliable. And it will fit in my small apartment.
Michael Boyd

Currently enjoying movies in China via itunes on a 13 inch Macbook.

#14 of 15 OFFLINE   Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer



  • 18,651 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted August 10 2006 - 06:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristopherDAC
there can be contrast changes smaller than the size of a shadowmask element.
That's an interesting observation, Christopher.

The impact of the effect is difficult to determine, theoretically, because the distance between the different colour grains is greater than the little area on which the effect is realized.

Nevertheless, it means that some of the higher resolution must be noticeable.


Cees

#15 of 15 OFFLINE   Michael Boyd

Michael Boyd

    Second Unit



  • 278 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 19 2000

Posted August 27 2006 - 02:58 PM

Okay, I'm in. I just bought the XBR970 for $948 at Best Buy. I'll live without flat panel and 1080P for awhile. I think it's going to seem kind of small compared to what's out there, but it's still a BIG upgrade from my two 27" TVs.
Michael Boyd

Currently enjoying movies in China via itunes on a 13 inch Macbook.