Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Article: The 15 People You Meet Listening to DVD Audio Commentaries

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Richard Kim

Richard Kim


  • 4,389 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 29 2001

Posted June 16 2006 - 05:36 AM

The Onion AV Club has a new article lampooning DVD commentaries. Pretty interesting read:


This one got a laugh from me:

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   Reagan


    Supporting Actor

  • 545 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 2002

Posted June 16 2006 - 07:20 AM

Nice article. I also feel that The Narrator (#3) and the The Nitpicker (#4) are pretty bad (I mean, I love a good commentary, but these types do more harm than good). But nobody can touch the The Irritating Academic (#1) for pure obnoxiousness. Just try to get through a certain commentary track on Basic Instinct (you know which one) without falling asleep. I actually like most of the rest of the list. -Reagan
The truth doesn't care whether you believe it.

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Executive Producer

  • 10,072 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted June 16 2006 - 07:22 AM

That article is hysterical -- because it's so true! I loves my commentaries, but Narrators and Strong Silent Types really irritate me.
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#4 of 7 OFFLINE   Dick



  • 4,632 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted June 16 2006 - 10:10 AM

Can't believe that, within fifteen choices, not one mentions the most irritating trait (to me) in commentaries: THE MUTUAL ADMIRATION SOCIETY, in which director/producer and/or cast are c-o-n-s-t-a-n-t-l-y saying things like, "She was just great in this," or "he did a marvelous job," etc. And possibly the most overused and egotistical director comment: "Oh, this is my favorite scene..." (usually repeated a half-dozen times during a given movie).

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Mark_TB


    Second Unit

  • 347 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 06 2005
  • LocationOmaha, Nebraska

Posted June 16 2006 - 10:33 AM

My pet peeve is the "You Had To Be There" type of commentary. It usually involves two or more members of the production, with comments like: "Oh! Remember the day we shot that scene?" "Oh, yeah! That was funny/crazy/sad/etc.!" But with no further explanation for the listener as to precisely why it was funny/crazy/sad/etc. Mark

#6 of 7 OFFLINE   Mark Kalzer

Mark Kalzer

    Second Unit

  • 443 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 19 2000

Posted June 16 2006 - 11:01 AM

No mention of the Confused Commentator who thinks they cannot talk about anything that happens later in the movie so that they do not spoil it.

Because...clearly, no one who listens to commentaries has actually watched the movie. I mean...that saves so much time for me personally! I get the movie and I get the commentary! It's a little different for TV shows I grant, but movies?
- Mark Kalzer

#7 of 7 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson


  • 5,456 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 16 2006 - 11:52 AM

Yup - those are probably the biggest complaints I have when I listen to commentaries, along with too much praise for all involved. BTW, for a perfect example of The Indifferent Cast Member, look no further than Beyond the Valley of the Dolls where John La Zar whines much of the time. Actually, he's not indifferent - he seems actively bitter and angry. He doesn't understand why he's there and gripes about money. He also picks on other cast members in attendance - the guy seems like a capital J JERK!
Colin Jacobson

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users