Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

The Breakup


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1 of 22 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,174 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted June 02 2006 - 09:44 AM

Love Vince Vaughn. Loved him in Swingers; Loved him in Old School; Dodgeball; Wedding Crashers.. But, Vince Vaughn can not save this crappy film. Yes, there are a few good lines. But on the whole, this film is a major-league let down. Definitively NOT worth $7, and I don't know if I would recommend it for a rental. The storyline is rather weak. I thought that it would be a neat twist to have the whole thing go absurdist and have them go to any lengths to keep the condo or whatever. Instead, it turns into a rather badly played mush-comedy. It reminds me most of "Along Came Polly". I am not sure if that's because Jennifer Aniston is the same character in these films, or because both films seem to miss almost entirely on any big joke. I judge a film by how many times I look at my watch. I probably looked down more then up. C-
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#2 of 22 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul



  • 38,029 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted June 03 2006 - 02:16 PM

My problem with the film was that Anniston gets blown away onscreen by Vaughn during their fights, and it's uncompelling cinema. Had her character had some real ammo to launch towards Vaughn's character, it would have made their break-up more interesting to watch. As-is, it's far too bland and unimaginative. I give it 2 stars, or a grade of C.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#3 of 22 OFFLINE   ChrisBEA

ChrisBEA

    Screenwriter



  • 1,657 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 19 2003

Posted June 03 2006 - 03:18 PM

I liked it, wouldn't say I liked it a lot.....
Vaughn was very funny, but felt Favreau upstaged him in their scenes together. I thought the first 45 minutes to an hour were good, but then it started really dragging the longer it went, and that ending? bleechh.

When I write my review it will get Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#4 of 22 OFFLINE   Quentin

Quentin

    Screenwriter



  • 2,541 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2002
  • Real Name:Quentin H
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted June 06 2006 - 11:55 AM

Wow. What a colossal misfire. For one thing, Aniston doesn't cut it. She's never warm enough or lovable enough. She's too skinny, too movie starrish, and not a good enough actor for this. I think she's cute, but there are too many better actresses out there. But, that's the least of the problems. The big issue here is structure and tone. Structure: act 1 is a series of photos as montage over opening credits, act 2 is the whole movie, there is an attempt at act 3 that feels tacked on to the final 10 minutes. Let me change that - the second act break feels tacked on and it lasts for the final 10 minutes. There really is no act 3. Tone: Watch WAR OF THE ROSES. It's funny! For starters, there is an act 1 in which you can buy they actually are so hot for each other they must be together. And, when the war begins it is because that spark is gone. And as the war progresses it is so over the top and they both hate one another so much it is hilarious. And, they destroy anything and everything between them. It's great symbolism. THE BREAK-UP is literally TOO real. First off, we're not ever sold on their relationship because all we get are a meet-cute and photos. They break up immediately. Then, while there are funny moments, the problem is that he is being an asshole and she is dumb as a stump. It's like what really happens when people just don't communicate properly and really had me thinking to past break ups. It doesn't make any sense in retrospect, and this whole movie is that. It's freakin' depressing! And, a few Vaughan riffs don't make up for it. They don't even 'destroy' anything or do anything outrageous, or even make a move! They just hurt each other.
Take the "Telly Savalas" gag from the trailer...she does it, and he has the funny reaction...and, then nothing. Her plan doesn't work because he is too stubborn to act on it, or try anything, or even try his own trick. He just continues being an ass.
Huh??? And, here's the punchline:
they stay broken up!! They go their separate ways and live life. Boy, that's funny! And, then they play "I can see clearly now" over the credits?? Does that mean there is hope for them now that they have survived this 'growth experience'?
I dunno...and, I don't care.

#5 of 22 OFFLINE   Holadem

Holadem

    Lead Actor



  • 8,972 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted June 06 2006 - 12:56 PM

Posted Image

The rare marquee name romantic comedy whose trailer caught my interest. The last one was Hitch, which I enjoyed. This one, barely, not enough to recommend.

To none's surprise, outside of anything involving Favereau, the best bits were in the trailer. And even Faverau was just OK - it is a prerequisite in these movies for the best friend/confident to be a riot, no? The leads brothers were just grating. Her boss strongly reminded me of Edna Mode from the Incredibles.

The batch of trailers before this movie was one of the most painful I had ever seen. You won't catch me watching those movies. Yikes.

--
H

#6 of 22 OFFLINE   danton_

danton_

    Auditioning



  • 3 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2006

Posted June 06 2006 - 01:57 PM

The movie was pretty good. Although I have to admit the ending dragged on for a bit, it was still enjoyable but they over did it.

#7 of 22 OFFLINE   RyanAn

RyanAn

    Screenwriter



  • 1,523 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2004

Posted June 06 2006 - 04:38 PM

How to have a successful movie: Have the characters in the movie being consisently unapolgetic and near unforgivable. No, I'm not talking about Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, I'm talking about "The Break Up." I'm not going to pretend that I never laughed. I laughed a lot. I laughed at the acting, the structure of the script... zing. But really, I think the balance of Vince Vaughn's character was never really seperated from "lovable goof who just can't seem to get what he did wrong to "what a dick." The character would have merit in not knowing why he was in the doghouse, and then in the next line of dialouge you would go from loving him to praying to God that your significant other does not think you are that way. Or even worse, think he is funny in doing what ever bonehead "typical dude" thing. It's definately written for a woman and a falsehood for a guy. I like how in the end...
If you loose weight and shave you will be a better, happier person.
Overall I felt as though they dangled pure comedy in our faces with just some inane pseudo coffee drinkin', "this is how you should live your life" border line propaganda. Don't even get me started on how great of an actress Jennifer Anniston is, or how completely uneven her bosses' character was. What was with:
the trip. We are just going to show an aerial view of the condo in time lapse, so we don't have to shoot on location...
I liked the video game idea, I thought they had something with Fav's "Don't worry, I'll help you out." speal, and loved the way they were going with the Sox game. I would give the movie a 5.5 out of 10 - C-'ish. ry

#8 of 22 OFFLINE   todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor



  • 6,979 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted June 07 2006 - 03:08 AM

I didn't see the movie. But, I love the scene I saw in a preview. Where Anniston brings a guy over to make Vaughn jealous. She goes in the other room and when she comes back. Vaughn and the other guy are joking and playing video games. And then as he is leaving asks Vaughn to call him. Posted Image
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#9 of 22 OFFLINE   Quentin

Quentin

    Screenwriter



  • 2,541 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2002
  • Real Name:Quentin H
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted June 07 2006 - 04:48 AM



#10 of 22 OFFLINE   Shawn_KE

Shawn_KE

    Screenwriter



  • 1,295 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 25 2003

Posted June 07 2006 - 04:13 PM

Quentin pretty much nailed it. Other than a few decent laughs, thought it was pretty dull.

#11 of 22 OFFLINE   brentl

brentl

    Screenwriter



  • 2,918 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 1999

Posted June 08 2006 - 06:10 AM

"Other than a few decent laughs, thought it was pretty dull."

PERFECT reviewPosted Image

Sorry, But Jennifer Aniston looked great IMO!

Brent

#12 of 22 OFFLINE   Shawn_KE

Shawn_KE

    Screenwriter



  • 1,295 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 25 2003

Posted June 08 2006 - 11:08 AM

Yea, she did look good. And Vaughn looked fat.

#13 of 22 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,354 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 09 2006 - 02:23 AM


Sure did. Maybe that's why they cast Vincent D'Onofrio and Jon Favreau - to make him look thinner! Posted Image
Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#14 of 22 OFFLINE   Holadem

Holadem

    Lead Actor



  • 8,972 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted June 09 2006 - 03:06 AM

Vaughn filled up, normal as one ages. He is definitely a far cry from his Swinger days when he was this tall skinny dude.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

But I can't believe anyone would call his current state "fat". Wowsers...

--
H

#15 of 22 OFFLINE   Quentin

Quentin

    Screenwriter



  • 2,541 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2002
  • Real Name:Quentin H
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted June 09 2006 - 05:00 AM

Actually, he clearly gained weight for the role, because he has lost it for the final scene (well, some of it). She mentions he looks good and has lost weight. He has! He's no longer a selfish slob, so it makes sense.

#16 of 22 OFFLINE   EricW

EricW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted June 11 2006 - 04:11 AM

weren't their re-shoots for this movie after test-audiences didn't like the ending?
rumor is that they redid it with them gettin gback together, but in the end, they don't. i don't know if this is the original ending, or if it's a reshot with them still not getting back together.
anyways, the ending kind of reminded me or Prime.
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#17 of 22 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,354 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 11 2006 - 06:45 AM

He looked more than just "filled up" - he looked tubby. Hey, fair is fair - in Hollywood, if an actress isn't 20 lbs. underweight, Internet losers call her fat!
Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#18 of 22 OFFLINE   Shawn_KE

Shawn_KE

    Screenwriter



  • 1,295 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 25 2003

Posted June 11 2006 - 07:13 AM

Well Fat may have been too harsh, lets just say he was very well fed.

#19 of 22 OFFLINE   EricW

EricW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted June 11 2006 - 12:27 PM

he looked Travolta-esque Posted Image
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#20 of 22 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,354 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted June 15 2006 - 06:51 AM

We'll call him "big-boned". Those bones sure have gotten a lot bigger over the last few years, though...
Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com