- View New Content
- Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads
- Home Theater Hardware
- Theaters, Remotes and Accessories
- Equipment Reviews
- DVD & Blu-ray Reviews
- Other Diversions
- Bargains and Deals
- Feedback and Testing
- Latest Blu-ray Deals
- Blu-ray Pre-Orders
- Shop Amazon & Support HTF
- Theater Photos
DVD & Blu-ray Reviews
- Equipment Reviews
- Shop Amazon
- Support HTF
XM Director Quits
15 replies to this topic
Posted February 16 2006 - 01:21 AM
AP XM Director Warns of Crisis, Shares Fall Thursday February 16, 9:13 am ET XM Director Warns of 'Crisis on the Horizon,' Shares Plunge in Premarket Trading NEW YORK (AP) -- XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. shares plunged in premarket trading Thursday after board member Pierce J. Roberts resigned, and warned of "a significant chance of a crisis on the horizon" in a letter to the company's chairman. ADVERTISEMENT Roberts, a former investment banker with Bear Stearns who is now a principal with private equity firm Mill Road Capital, said he resigned as a result of disagreements with the company's management over its future direction. He did not state exactly where he feels XM Satellite Radio is going wrong. "I have been troubled about the current direction of the company and do not believe that it is in the best interest of the company's shareholders," Roberts said in a letter to XM Satellite's chairman that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "For some time I have made my analyses and observations known in an increasingly vociferous manner to the board and a number of senior managers of the company." Roberts said he believes he can no longer be effective, given the ongoing disagreement with management and the other board members, and believed in his views "too much to just go along." He could not be reached for comment. A spokesman for XM Satellite Radio did not immediately return telephone calls. According to an analyst at JPMorgan, the disagreement stemmed from the company's increased spending on subscriber growth. Separately, the Washington-based company reported its fourth-quarter loss widened by 42 percent on higher subscriber acquisition costs and marketing expenses. The company said it had more than 5.9 million subscribers at the end of 2005, up 84 percent from a year earlier, and said its total had risen to more than 6 million in the first week of January. XM Satellite Radio has been under increasing pressure to hold its lead over smaller rival Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., which this year began attracting more subscribers with the addition of shock jock Howard Stern to its lineup. Last week, XM announced media titan Oprah Winfrey would launch her own channel on the network. Shares of XM tumbled $2.25, or 8.9 percent, to $23 in premarket trading on the INET electronic exchange. The stock closed Wednesday at $25.25 on the Nasdaq, where it has traded within a 52-week range of $23.01 to $37.31. Sirius shares fell 16 cents, or 2.8 percent, to $5.66 in premarket trading after it closed Wednesday at $5.82 on the Nasdaq.
Posted February 16 2006 - 04:43 AM
No problem. Tomorrow is SIRI's turn to announce. Here's the key numbers for them: Before today, the results were expected to be: XM Lose $250M, ~900,000-1M in growth. Actual was XM lost $280M, 896,000 growth. So, not nearly as bad as painted, but not as good as it could have been, thus the fall. SIRI is expected (was) to lose $290M and add ~1M-1.1M in subscribers in Q4 (note: this is not Q1, so ending of Dec. 31) I don't expect SIRI to lose less then $280M, so they will probably lose more then XM (as predicted) but if they keep the margin close, it will be a good sign for them. (ie, if they hit the market expectation). On the other hand, if SIRI can show that they signficantly outpaced XM in subscriptions in Q4 (XM=896,000, so if SIRI came in at 1.3M or more, which is still a bit of a longshot) it would be a monumental boost to their stock because it would be a sign that in a full quarter SIRI showed more consumer level growth then XM. Although it doesn't change that XM has more subscribers, it would be a significant boost as far as perception of "momentum" in the market. But we'll have to wait and see. If SIRI loses more then $315M or if the have less then 1M activations, SIRI will also face a similar significant tumble. The rule of thumb will be: XM underachieved against market predictions. Can SIRI overachieve or even just hold serve? That's their goal now.
Posted February 16 2006 - 05:14 AM
When I subscribed to XM a little over a year ago, I paid for a 2 year deal. At this point in time, I'm glad that I did not go for the five year deal, because who knows if they will still be here in five years. The satellite companies are spending way too much on promotion and "big name" talent. I only listen to the music and could not care less about all the other crap on the other channels. Every time I try to listen to any of it, there are almost as many commercials as terrestrial radio. XM would be better off to put their money into expanding bandwidth on the music channels and put out CD quality sound. If they keep up this insane competition with Sirius to grab any big name and throw money at them, They won't be around in five years.
Posted February 16 2006 - 05:36 AM
This is not good news at all for satellite radio. In a way, we can only hope that SIRI posts positive results tomorrow or it will bring both companies down even further. You are looking at a guy that bought XM at a high of $40 and has seen this stock plummet over the past year. I own SIRI stock too, and have taken a smaller loss. I think those of us who own satellite radio know the potential of the industry, but are greatly worried by the amount of overspending both these companies have done in order to bring in new subscribers.
Posted February 16 2006 - 07:57 AM
Ron, I imagine Sirius will post a loss as well. Both companies have thrown a slew of money at talent. I just don't see it as a good week for both companies, but who knows? But Both companies are still in their infancy. I mean remember when FM was an ignored commodity? But as far as an XM shareholders can imagine, it's never good when an executive steps down and has ill-fated words on the way out.
Posted February 16 2006 - 10:36 AM
Not good news at all for the future of SatRad. Every subscriber of both services need to hope for the best to maintain a competetive balance. If one company goes under then it would devastate Satellite Radio for a long time to come.
Posted February 16 2006 - 11:44 PM
This quote gives me chills. I do remember when FM was an ignored commodity. It also had great programming then. Programing more like XM has. Does this mean if XM becomes a less ignored commodity, the programing will become more like current FM? I hope not. Just a thought.
Posted February 18 2006 - 02:57 PM
I personally think that the financial losses of both XM and Sirius could make it more likely both services will merge within 2-3 years' time.
Raymond in Sacramento, CA USA
Posted February 19 2006 - 02:47 PM
I agree but I'll bet it comes sooner unless World Space (XM major investor) steps in which assumes they're in financial condition to do so.
I am not young enough to know everything. -Oscar Wilde-
Posted February 20 2006 - 02:12 AM
What would the Pros and Cons be of a unified service? Cons: Expensive - A unified service would probably go for 14-20 per month. Music would suffer - One programming philosophy would win out which would alienate the subscribers of the other service. Lots of subscribers would cancel. No Competetion - Which would lead to a lack of improvements and stagnation. The feud that would erupt between O&A and Stern when they had to work for the same company. That would be all either of them would talk about. Equipment problems - The unforseen problems of having two services and one receiver. Pros: Every sport would be covered by one service. Five satellites instead of two or three. That's about it. Cons win.
Posted February 20 2006 - 03:26 AM
This is the biggest concern of all.
People dedicated to satellite radio for
music are going to suffer the most. With
XM and SIRIUS having distinctively different
programming philosophies on the way they
present their music, somebody will lose badly.
As much as I hate SIRIUS, I want it to
survive just so the companies never need
to merge and the music is compromised.
If the two companies ever merged and the
SIRIUS playlists won -- I would give up my
satellite radio and depend on MP3 player.
I am sure there are SIRIUS subscribers who
would say the same thing if XM programming
were to win.
(see, I covered BOTH bases)
Posted February 21 2006 - 03:01 AM
The feds would not likely allow the two to merge. We went through this a while back with DISH and DirecTV. They won't allow the monopoly.
Posted February 21 2006 - 02:16 PM
Michael St. Clair, you wrote: But that's a different situation--both Echostar and DirecTV are actually profitable. With both Sirius and XM losing money big time, the Feds may make an exception for financial reasons.
Raymond in Sacramento, CA USA
Posted February 21 2006 - 04:18 PM
You might be right but I'm with Ron on this. I hope it doesn't happen. Anything that could conceivably dilute XM Radio's incredible music programming would be disastrous.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users