Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

2006 at the Box Office


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2055 replies to this topic

#41 of 2056 OFFLINE   Cory S.

Cory S.

    Supporting Actor



  • 984 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 07 2004

Posted January 02 2006 - 06:16 AM

After having read The Da Vinci Code over the weekend and realizing the enormous success and popularity of the novel and reading up on the controversy, I think the film has a serious shot at challegning Dead Man's Chest for top grosser next year. As much as I want to believe Superman Returns or Cars will be the top grossers, to me, it's between Dead Man's Chest and Da Vinic Code. It will be huge. Write it down....
"Because he's the hero Gotham deserves.  But, not the one it needs right now.  So, we'll hunt.  Because he can take.  Because, he's not a hero.  He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector.  A DARK KNIGHT."

#42 of 2056 OFFLINE   Gregory Vaughan

Gregory Vaughan

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 65 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 1999

Posted January 02 2006 - 06:50 AM

I'm more cautious about The Da Vinci code. I don't think it can just ride on the book's coat tails. The book was mostly about ideas, so I'm not sure people who read the book are itching to see a film version, and the whole phenomenon got discussed to death. Given the people involved it seems like it should be a really good film, but I think it's a tricky one to get right. The box office for this film will be very sensitive to reviews (unlike the book), and it could easily be a disappointment (I'm assuming it has a pretty big budget).

#43 of 2056 OFFLINE   Cory S.

Cory S.

    Supporting Actor



  • 984 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 07 2004

Posted January 02 2006 - 06:59 AM

It could go either way. Depends on the media blitz leading up to it. If it's anywhere near what Gibson's The Passion was, we could see huge numbers. I still believe it will be huge. Not 300 million huge, but could be close. Still, at the end of the day, it was good quest tale that's been told before...just more intriguing.
"Because he's the hero Gotham deserves.  But, not the one it needs right now.  So, we'll hunt.  Because he can take.  Because, he's not a hero.  He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector.  A DARK KNIGHT."

#44 of 2056 OFFLINE   Kevin Grey

Kevin Grey

    Screenwriter



  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: May 20 2003

Posted January 02 2006 - 10:09 AM

I'm curious about DaVinci Code's performance too. No doubt it will be big but its a story that has been so heavily covered in the media that it holds few surprises even for those who haven't read the book. And I'm not sure that it holds a lot of lot of extra appeal in visual form unlike adaptations of Harry Potter or LOTR. Though actually seeing the artwork should be pretty cool.
I see it as the anti-Passion. One of the reasons for the Passion's success was that it got people in the theater who otherwise don't typically go. Some of the segment will be staunchly opposed to DaVinci Code, sight unseen. I'd guess closer to $200 million for it than $300 million. Re: Dead Men's Chest- I think it definitely could go over $300 million but this could be a potential victim of overly inflated expectations. The first movie was almost better than it had any right to be and the material was certainly there for a mess of epic proportions if not handled right. If they don't hit the recipe exactly right this time out then I can see audience reaction going from love to hate rather quickly. If it doesn't meet audience expectations then it could drop quickly and leave Disney panicked about PotC 3 the following year.

#45 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chris_T

Chris_T

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 208 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2000

Posted January 02 2006 - 10:41 AM

Regarding PotC-DMC. I think it may go the route of the more traditional sequel earning less than the original. I'm seeing a gross in the $250 million range. As for the top grosser, I think it will be between Superman Returns and The DaVinci Code. I think both will flirt with the $300 million barrier. May looks way too cluttered with tentpole movies. Couldn't the studios have spaced these movies out better? And then they bitch & moan about BO revenues being down.

#46 of 2056 OFFLINE   Galen_V

Galen_V

    Second Unit



  • 352 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 12 2003

Posted January 02 2006 - 01:32 PM

I think that The DaVinci Code will be the biggest money earner worldwide by the end of the year, but will be No. 3 domestically behind Cars and Dead Man's Chest. I'll admit that I'm not super excited for Cars, but I'm still going to see it since it's a Pixar movie. I mean, Shrek 2 wasn't a very good movie but it still made $441 million dollars domestically. My only reservation is that I think the media will start picking up on this grumbling and make people think that it's a flop; if that doesn't happen though I think it has a great chance to do as well, if not better than, Finding Nemo. Speaking of bad press, if Vince Vaughn and Jennifer Aniston keep up a healthy image between now and June I think The Break-Up will be huge hit, so that'll be my "sleeper". Also, do you know if Borat is going to be released in the U.S. Terry?

#47 of 2056 ONLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,377 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted January 02 2006 - 01:59 PM

An adaptation of a comic book = "fresh ideas"?
Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#48 of 2056 ONLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,377 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted January 02 2006 - 02:00 PM

My point remains: not all "basic sci-fi action flicks" make money...
Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#49 of 2056 OFFLINE   TerryRL

TerryRL

    Producer



  • 3,977 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001

Posted January 02 2006 - 02:14 PM

Galen, the status of "Borat" is very much up in the air. Its set to be released in the UK later this year, but currently there are no plans to release this one in the states. Worse case scenario is that the movie goes straight-to-DVD. If this one is to get a U.S. theatrical release, it may not happen until early next year. That's all I know about it, I hope it was of some help to you.
"Quite an experience to live in fear isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave."

#50 of 2056 OFFLINE   Josh.C

Josh.C

    Second Unit



  • 469 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 20 2005

Posted January 02 2006 - 03:42 PM

Colin, Sin City is definitely "fresh", yes its based off a comic book, but I was referring more to the way it was filmed. Really nothing to compare it to. Yes, we have plenty of comic book movie adaptations out there, but none like Sin City.

#51 of 2056 OFFLINE   Claire Panke

Claire Panke

    Second Unit



  • 409 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 05 2002

Posted January 02 2006 - 04:01 PM

Snakes on a Plane, How to Eat Fried Worms, Food Fight - what a yummy trio! I'm always surprised by several films' performances and I expect 2006 will be the same. Having seen the trailer for DaVinci Code on the big screen , I must say it looks like a box office winner. (I ain't excited but the folks in my office are.)

#52 of 2056 OFFLINE   Robert Anthony

Robert Anthony

    Producer



  • 3,218 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2003

Posted January 02 2006 - 05:25 PM


Sounds rather Matrix-y. And that's my worry, as well. No one really expected anything out of Pirates, and as such, when it ended up being a really good movie, people were shocked as hell. But now theres' expectation, and a fair amount of it.

I'm still looking forward to it, though Posted Image

#53 of 2056 OFFLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,020 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted January 03 2006 - 01:55 PM

WEEKEND ACTUALS 1. The Chronicles of Narnia $33,712,024 2. King Kong $31,826,925 3. Fun with Dick and Jane $21,025,463 4. Cheaper by the Dozen 2 $18,857,703 5. Rumor Has It $11,790,273
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#54 of 2056 OFFLINE   TerryRL

TerryRL

    Producer



  • 3,977 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001

Posted January 03 2006 - 05:48 PM

Looks like Universal will be releasing "The Bourne Ultimatum" in 2007. WB also announced that "Ocean's Thirteen" will be going into production later this year, it is also set for a 2007 launch. A lack of sequels is one of the reasons being attributed to 2005's lower-than-expected showing at the box office. After all, the top two grossers of the year were sequels ('Revenge of the Sith' and 'The Goblet of Fire') and some of this year's most anticipated films are sequels as well (POTC: DMC, X3, M:I-3, etc.). 2007 is going to be loaded with sequels.
"Quite an experience to live in fear isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave."

#55 of 2056 OFFLINE   Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor



  • 7,712 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted January 03 2006 - 05:50 PM

Ocean's 13???? puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze. :b

#56 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chris Atkins

Chris Atkins

    Producer



  • 3,887 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002

Posted January 04 2006 - 01:02 AM

I think I agree that DaVinci Code will win the Box Office in 2006. Not only does it have a built in box office, but it has almost no competition for its audience in the three weeks after its release. I think those two factors give it an edge.

#57 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chuck Mayer

Chuck Mayer

    Lead Actor



  • 8,023 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2001
  • Real Name:Chuck Mayer
  • LocationNorthern Virginia

Posted January 04 2006 - 01:12 AM

DaVinci Code is missing the major summer target audience...teenage boys. I don't see it winning the year without some of that money.
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?

#58 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chris Atkins

Chris Atkins

    Producer



  • 3,887 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002

Posted January 04 2006 - 01:36 AM

But it will probably pull in a lot of people that don't normally attend the movies too...older folks who read more books than see movies.

#59 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chuck Mayer

Chuck Mayer

    Lead Actor



  • 8,023 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2001
  • Real Name:Chuck Mayer
  • LocationNorthern Virginia

Posted January 04 2006 - 01:54 AM

I agree...but they see a movie once. Teenage boys might hit it a few times. It'll be a hit, but a Bourne Supremacy-type hit. That was an adult film that pulled in adults. I think it'll make more than that...but not $300M numbers.
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?

#60 of 2056 OFFLINE   Chris Atkins

Chris Atkins

    Producer



  • 3,887 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002

Posted January 04 2006 - 02:13 AM

Also, don't forget the no competition thing. I don't see a lot of movies that would pull away its audience (or any audience) for at least three weeks. That could be a huge advantage in a crowded summer.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users