Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

*** Official MUNICH Discussion Thread

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
128 replies to this topic

#1 of 129 OFFLINE   Bill Huelbig

Bill Huelbig

    Second Unit

  • 443 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2000
  • Real Name:Bill Huelbig
  • LocationWeehawken, NJ

Posted December 11 2005 - 01:12 AM

The Variety review is not so good (and contains spoilers):


Quotation of entire review deleted by moderator. See HTF Rule 10. - MR

#2 of 129 OFFLINE   Magnus T

Magnus T

    Supporting Actor

  • 683 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 26 2003

Posted December 11 2005 - 08:47 AM

It's Todd McCarthy. He hates everything.
There is no spoon...
but there is a fork with a cork!

#3 of 129 OFFLINE   RobertR


    Lead Actor

  • 9,632 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted December 11 2005 - 09:23 AM

The New Republic blasted it:


The article is not atypical of criticism of Spielberg in general.

#4 of 129 OFFLINE   MikeRS



  • 1,326 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2002

Posted December 11 2005 - 09:24 AM

David Ansen put it in his top ten of the year (#8)


Quotation of entire review deleted by moderator. See HTF Rule 10. - MR

#5 of 129 ONLINE   Tino



  • 6,263 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted December 11 2005 - 09:33 AM

Not everything. He loved King Kong. Posted Image
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#6 of 129 OFFLINE   MikeRS



  • 1,326 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2002

Posted December 11 2005 - 09:57 AM

Hollywood Reporter gave it high marks.

Quotation of entire review deleted by moderator. See HTF Rule 10. - MR

#7 of 129 OFFLINE   Chris Atkins

Chris Atkins


  • 3,887 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002

Posted December 11 2005 - 02:07 PM

And ROTS too. Posted Image

#8 of 129 OFFLINE   TheLongshot



  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted December 11 2005 - 04:15 PM

Jeff Wells didn't like it either. Jason

#9 of 129 OFFLINE   Kyle_D


    Second Unit

  • 403 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2004

Posted December 11 2005 - 04:25 PM

Not true. He said it was a perfectly good movie that was still hanging with him the day after he saw it. He just didn't think it was an Oscar contender and has been hilighting the negative responses in his blog.

#10 of 129 OFFLINE   MikeRS



  • 1,326 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2002

Posted December 12 2005 - 11:22 AM

Washington Area Film Critics gave Spielberg and Munich top honors. First critics group to do so.

Will it be the only one.....

#11 of 129 OFFLINE   BrettB



  • 3,024 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2001

Posted December 16 2005 - 06:50 AM

Here is a really good LA Times article.

Also, the official Munich website has been updated with a lot of new content including a short video (Steven Spielberg Newswrap) which has Spielberg discussing his motivations.

#12 of 129 OFFLINE   Mike Heenan

Mike Heenan

    Second Unit

  • 405 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 2001

Posted December 16 2005 - 11:01 AM

I'm interested to see whether he mentions the Lillehammer debacle or not... One thing I found hilarious is how the JDF is pretty much branding spielberg an anti semite for making the movie, which is kind of ironic.

#13 of 129 OFFLINE   Joe Wong

Joe Wong

    Second Unit

  • 292 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 08 1999

Posted December 18 2005 - 10:08 PM

Berardinelli's top film of 2005:



#14 of 129 OFFLINE   Chris Harvey

Chris Harvey

    Second Unit

  • 267 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2001

Posted December 21 2005 - 01:05 PM

FWIW, it's also David Edelstein's #1 and it's Ebert's #3.

#15 of 129 OFFLINE   MichaelBA


    Supporting Actor

  • 747 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 19 2005

Posted December 22 2005 - 02:29 PM

NPR report.
He's got the bit between his teeth... all right!

#16 of 129 OFFLINE   ZacharyTait



  • 2,187 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 10 2003

Posted December 22 2005 - 05:35 PM

I'm going home for Christmas so I can't even see this until Monday or Tuesday. Aargh!

#17 of 129 OFFLINE   JoshB


    Supporting Actor

  • 901 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 25 2001

Posted December 23 2005 - 08:36 PM

It's unfortunate that this is only out in 400 or so theaters this weekend. It will do pretty decent business, but likely not to reach the top 3 or maybe even 5 this weekend in totals. Hopefully they expand next weekend because this is my most anticipated film of the year! I asked for the book "Striking Back" (which came out this week) for Christmas so hopfully I will have that to hold me over.
"To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards out of men."

Operation Iraqi Freedom Campaign Veteran, 06-08.
Operation Iraqi Freedom Campaign Veteran, 09-10.

Operation Enduring Freedom Campaign Veteran, 12-13.

#18 of 129 OFFLINE   Kristian


    Supporting Actor

  • 946 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 16 2001

Posted December 24 2005 - 03:50 AM

Am I the only one who thought that the ADR work was a little rough on this film? There were times when the dialogue (particularly some lines spoken by Daniel Craig and Geoffrey Rush) didn't sound very natural or sync up very well. Maybe this was intentional on Spielberg's part to approximate that rough '70s feel, but it was a little jarring to me. As for the rest of the film... I'm a huge fan of Spielberg, but I do not feel that this ranks as one of his strongest films. That being said, I do want to spotlight two moments from the film that I found memorable:
In the scene where Avner is in the hospital holding his new baby girl, he says something to his wife to the effect of "Home for me has always been with you". She responds with a laugh, saying that it's a "corny line" and that she married a sentimentalist. Since Spielberg has been accused of being a sentimentalist, I think he chose this moment to poke a little fun at himself.
The final shot, with Avner walking away and the Twin Towers coming into view, is absolute perfection. It's an absolutely haunting image that makes the film far more than just a film about 1972-1973. I also love the way that the score swells up with this shot, after being mostly in the background during the rest of the film.

Film Lists: 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | Pre-2006 | 2009

#19 of 129 OFFLINE   Quentin



  • 2,646 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2002
  • Real Name:Quentin H
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted December 24 2005 - 04:35 AM

Technically, and as a thriller, this is a very good film. And, Bana is really exceptional. But, morally, politically, and philosophically, I am diametrically opposed to Spielberg's POV. I do not believe in the moral equivalence argument. I think it leads down a naive and dangerous road. But, that is all I will say regarding the subject due to forum rules. I would recommend seeing it with the very important caveat that it is likely nowhere near the truth of what the real men went through and that it presents an argument that you may not agree with.

#20 of 129 OFFLINE   Mike Heenan

Mike Heenan

    Second Unit

  • 405 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 2001

Posted December 24 2005 - 02:14 PM

Maybe not the other men involved in the 3 teams of kidon that did the assassinations, but this could have been the way the "real" Avner felt. Of course it remains to be seen whether Avner is a real person or not. It is interesting to hear the backlash on this book/movie, saying this isn't how it happened, etc, but it is pretty widely known that there were kidon teams sent out to kill the perpetrators of the Olympics massacre.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users