Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

The Downside to buying your first HD Widescreen TV...

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 of 12 OFFLINE   Adam Sanchez

Adam Sanchez

    Supporting Actor

  • 908 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 04 1999

Posted October 23 2005 - 08:11 PM

I can hardly stand to watch any channel besides the 5 or so I have in HD...(HD is so amazing... especially Discovery HD theater) And it sucks to go through my movie collection now and see the non-anamorphic DVDs I have. Ugh!

#2 of 12 OFFLINE   John Gido

John Gido

    Second Unit

  • 312 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 18 2001

Posted October 24 2005 - 02:47 AM

What sucks even more is owning your first widescreen HDTV (without built-in HDTV tuner) for over a year and your cable provider NOT yet offering HDTV in your area! Posted Image

I've been promised HDTV for over 8 months, all of the surrounding towns have HDTV, and I'm still at least 3 months away. Posted Image I keep hearing something about hardware upgrades not being complete. Posted Image

The only thing that has kept me from going to satellite/dish is having to outright buy the STB from the provider as HDTV is not included in their "4 rooms for free" promotions. Laying out almost $300 for a STB that the cable system provides for a minimal rental fee cannot be justified.
Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support
group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar.
-Drew Carey

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."-UnknownMy DVD Collection

#3 of 12 OFFLINE   JeremyErwin



  • 3,219 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 11 2001

Posted October 24 2005 - 03:00 AM

and looking at the phillipsburg entry at antennaweb, I can see that you live in a hdtv free zone. Well, not really. One Violet station.

#4 of 12 OFFLINE   John S

John S


  • 5,460 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2003

Posted October 24 2005 - 03:06 AM

It is the reason i am not paying for anything. I get lots of free OTA HD. Standard broadcast and cable NTSC for the most part is such a step down. Makes it hard for sure.

#5 of 12 OFFLINE   Jordan_E



  • 2,233 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2002

Posted October 24 2005 - 03:57 AM

But, another problem arises even when you receive a fair amount of HD channels: you want more! I grind my teeth every time I see that "available in high definition" when I tune in to TNT once in a while, or wish I had MONSTERS HD available on Dish. Between my cable and OTA receiver I am pretty much covered locally, but want MORE! Posted Image
And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...

#6 of 12 OFFLINE   Charlie Campisi

Charlie Campisi


  • 1,532 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2004

Posted October 24 2005 - 04:15 AM

You need to do some more homework. As long as you are in antenna range you should get the stb. Call directv directly instead of going through a big box store. They can give you credits to bring the price of the box down. You also can get them on ebay for $125 or so. The Hughes HD box I had could also be used without directv enabled to pull in OTA HD with an antenna, so even if you walked away from directv when cable became available, you'd still get utility out of the box. Not having HD because of the cost outlay is not a good reason. HD is here, and for a reasonable price.

#7 of 12 OFFLINE   Daman


    Second Unit

  • 402 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2004

Posted October 25 2005 - 03:31 AM

Adam, I recently got a plasma hdtv and the reception on even the standard def channels has been pretty good. I would recommend you asking your cable company to improve the signal and see if that helps. Do you use a settop box? If your unit has an option for cable card and your cable company provides it(mine does- comcast), try it out.. I get fantastic SD feed now, better than the STB i was running earlier through component feed.

#8 of 12 OFFLINE   Jerome Grate

Jerome Grate


  • 2,935 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 1999

Posted October 25 2005 - 04:07 AM

Sometimes you gotta lower your standards, and go for the best possible picture you can get. For me not enough HD channels are available, even through satellite, therefore you make SD channels look as good as possible. I-scan Pro for 120 bucks used, gives me 480p on all SD channels via satellite broadcast, better with it than without it. Next upscaling player to 1080i all DVD viewing. That got me satisfied until there's more channels available. Dish I think has a slew of channels HD but DirecTV is limited. Unfortunately Dish for me is impossible since there are so many trees and with me in the mountain makes it even tougher. Make the best out of it.
Listen Up People.., Rack Em and Pack Em.., We're Phantoms in 15.

#9 of 12 OFFLINE   Adam Sanchez

Adam Sanchez

    Supporting Actor

  • 908 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 04 1999

Posted October 25 2005 - 07:13 AM

I already got a Upscaling DVD player. It was the first thing I got to go with my TV so I could see somewhat what it could do. I got it before cable actually.

#10 of 12 OFFLINE   SteveKNJ


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 73 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 10 2003

Posted October 28 2005 - 05:46 AM

Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly is an "upscaling" DVD player. I will be ugrading to HDTV sometime over the next year, and one of the things I figured I'd need to replace is my DVD player. I have a 3 or 4 year old Sony, non progressive scan DVD player which I love, but I guess I will have to retire it once I go HDTV. How much do these upscallers cost? The one I get HAS to have the ability to remember where I left off on at least 5 of the DVDs I last watch as I very rarely have the time to watch a DVD in full the first time.

#11 of 12 OFFLINE   charlieGee



  • 4 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2005

Posted October 28 2005 - 08:44 AM

I'm not sure if this is the place to post this question. I am in very first stage of researching for a home theater. I know nothing of the differences between Plasma, LCD and DLP (is this correct?). I would greatly appreciate a beginners lesson on the differences and which is the best technology. Thanks in advance.

#12 of 12 OFFLINE   Chris Gerhard

Chris Gerhard


  • 1,275 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 08 2002
  • Real Name:Chris Gerhard

Posted October 28 2005 - 02:04 PM

A DVD player that has a chip that scales the 480i data on the DVD to a higher resolution (usually 720p or 1080i) which many believe, myself included, that some HDTVs will benefit from. A simple explanation is first the data has to be deinterlaced then by using digital processing the resolution is increased. There is of course no addition detail added but for reasons completely beyond my understanding the picture appears sharper. This of course is intended to make DVD look better and whether or not you believe it works on your HDTV is entirely up to you. It doesn't make DVD look like HDTV by any stretch of the imagination but for me offers a subtle improvement. There are expensive and inexpensive upscaling players ranging from about $100 to over $3000. Chris