Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

NAD c320bee to receiver


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic

#1 of 4 OFFLINE   Cagri

Cagri

    Second Unit



  • 415 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 18 2002

Posted October 18 2005 - 09:43 AM

Hi all. I have been using my HT setup since about 4 years and it stayed as an entry level setup as was... Only last evening I bought a NAD c320bee thinking it would improve my 2 ch listening, but right after buying it I realised that if I added that to my system through the receiver preouts, I would only be using its power amp section and the decoding would still be done by the receiver... So I went back to the store and bought a pair of used B&W L1 bookshelves. So I am running 2 sets of speakers now, my old Kefs for 2 channel and the new bookshelves on top of the Kefs... It didn't make a noticeable difference to my ears to have replaced the Kefs with B&Ws with movies, but NAD way overperformed my old receiver for music. My question is; could I have hooked the integrated to the receiver and still use the integrated amp as an "integrated" ? In other words was it unnecessary to add a second set of speakers ?
Thanks.
Too much debt...

#2 of 4 OFFLINE   John Garcia

John Garcia

    Executive Producer



  • 11,550 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 1999
  • Real Name:John
  • LocationNorCal

Posted October 18 2005 - 10:42 AM

You could use the main L&R pre-out from your receiver to the NAD to power the mains for movies and use another input on the NAD directly from your source to it for music listening. The only problem I can see is keeping your volume adusted correctly when switching between the two.
HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, Carnegie Acoustics CSB-1s + CSC-1, GR Research A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-105, PS4, PS3,URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100 Bluejeans Cable
System Two: Marantz PM7200, Pioneer FS52s, Panasonic BD79
(stolen) : Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G)

Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it’ll spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.” – Albert Einstein

 


#3 of 4 OFFLINE   FeisalK

FeisalK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,245 posts
  • Join Date: May 01 2003

Posted October 18 2005 - 04:13 PM

as John says if you use the C320BEE as an integrated you'd have a problem with maintaining the volume levels as you switch between the two.

if you connected the receiver pre-outs to the integrated amp's pre-in then the receiver would effectively be your preamp and youc an control the volume in one place. as you said, only using the power amp section of the integrated.

I suspect the better power section and power supply of the 2 channels isolated from the receiver is giving you the better sound

Quote:
It didn't make a noticeable difference to my ears to have replaced the Kefs with B&Ws

then it was not really necessary to add speakers Posted Image
>
DVD-A registry for hirez/surround audio
Bluray, DVD-Audio, DAD/HDAD, DualDisc, MVI

#4 of 4 OFFLINE   Cagri

Cagri

    Second Unit



  • 415 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 18 2002

Posted October 19 2005 - 06:47 AM

Quote:
then it was not really necessary to add speakers


I wasn't after sound improvement, actually what I was trying to say was replacing my old speakers with smaller bookshelves for movies did not cause any deterioration in the sound. I now have two different set ups for HT and music at same point in my room, bookshelves on Kefs. Maybe that was not necessary and I could have lived with my old floorstanders if I had done what John has suggested but I think I'll keep the B&W's as I have got them for a very reasonable price.
Too much debt...





Forum Nav Content I Follow