-Not Logged In-

Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Films That Barely Got by with a PG-13

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
107 replies to this topic

#1 of 108 OFFLINE   WillG



  • 5,275 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 02:38 AM

I was having a discussion with my girlfriend about what some of the differences between what gets a film a PG-13 vs and R Rating. It led me to think of films that just seemed to squeak by with a PG-13, some of the "hardest" films that got by with the rating, films that I was surpried was only PG-13 instead of R or films which probably should have received an "R" according to MPAA standards but for some reason got away with the PG-13. A few off the top of my head. "As Good as it Gets" - Helen Hunt makes a refenence to "Fucking" in a sexual context. Should be an automatic "R" but I suppose it got by with the PG-13 because of the "Prestige" status of the film. "Minority Report" - The shot of the couple having sex during the spider scene seemed to me like it was really pushing the limits. True, the naughty parts were strategically covered, but still seemed risque. (I think Spielberg has been known to have receieved a little extra latitiude from the Ratings Board that most directors don't get) Of course "Titanic" for the sketch scene. Yes, it was tastefully done, but it seems like you see more than what would be considered PG-13 safe "Breif Nudity" Anyone have some other examples?
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#2 of 108 OFFLINE   Jesse Blough

Jesse Blough

    Second Unit

  • 251 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 25 2002

Posted August 28 2005 - 02:55 AM

I always thought Little Nicky should have been rated R.

I hate it when movies like that squeak by with a PG-13 and yet movies like Lost in Translation get a R rating. The way movies get rated is so messed up. Posted Image

#3 of 108 OFFLINE   Garrett Lundy

Garrett Lundy


  • 3,764 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 05 2002

Posted August 28 2005 - 03:45 AM

Beauty Shop was rated R, but then rerated Pg-13 on appeal with no changes in content. I'd never seen that happen before.
"Did you know that more people are murdered at 92 degrees Fahrenheit than any other temperature? I read an article once. Lower temperatures, people are easy-going, over 92 and it's too hot to move, but just 92, people get irritable."

#4 of 108 OFFLINE   Cory H.

Cory H.

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 191 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 22 2005

Posted August 28 2005 - 04:07 AM

I think it's best that LIT was R, so that fewer people saw it in theatres. Posted Image

Not that's even PG-13, I'm surprised "A Streetcar Named Desire" got away with PG, and Pal's "WOTW" a G! A PRIEST IS INCINERATED FOR PETE'S SAKE!

#5 of 108 OFFLINE   RyanAn



  • 1,523 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2004

Posted August 28 2005 - 05:45 AM

Cory, the first film ever to get a PG-13 rating was in 1984's Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Prior to that, films were G, PG, R, and X. Streetcar was not bad enough to elicit an R, so it is a good thing it got a PG. Ryan

#6 of 108 OFFLINE   Kevin Grey

Kevin Grey


  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: May 20 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 05:53 AM

Nope, it was Red Dawn. Temple of Doom, combined with that other Spielberg produced film of 1984 Gremlins, were what instigated enough outrage to get the PG-13 created, however. And my vote- "Woman in Red" which actually has full frontal female nudity.

#7 of 108 OFFLINE   RyanAn



  • 1,523 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2004

Posted August 28 2005 - 05:58 AM

D'oh! I'll give myself half a point. Ryan

#8 of 108 OFFLINE   Linda Thompson

Linda Thompson

    Supporting Actor

  • 966 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2004

Posted August 28 2005 - 06:24 AM

It's been a long time since I've watched "Kramer vs Kramer", but, didn't it have brief nudity (JoBeth Williams in a hallway, meeting Billy for the first time), as well as some semi-strong language, yet it was only rated PG?

#9 of 108 OFFLINE   WillG



  • 5,275 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 07:53 AM

Another oft mentioned film like that was "The Andromeda Strain" It has a G Rating but there is a shot of a bare chested female corpse, a scientist cuts into a dead man's wrist which releases powdered blood and there is a pretty realistic depection of a monkey dying from exposure to a virus, not to mention language that you would not expect to find in a G rated film. I believe that in the trailer there was a disclaimer warning that some scenes in the film might be too intense for younger viewers, but isn't that what PG is for? It does seem the ratings board was a lot more liberal concerning content in the 70s and 80s. It would be interesting to see what ratings many of the 70's and 80's PG movies would be rated R (or a very borderline PG-13) if submitted today. And in contrast, there were also films rated R back then that seem very tame by today's standards. With the exception of the bedroom scene with Michael and Appalonia, I think "The Godfather" today could have squeaked by with a PG-13. I remember watching that dumb movie where McCauley Culkin was evil..."The Good Son" I believe and wondering why that got an R rating, becuase McCauley uses the word "Fuck" (non-sexually)? that's the only thing in that movie which brings it remotely close to an R Rating. I guess all this really proves is how disjointed the ratings board is.
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#10 of 108 OFFLINE   DavidBC


    Second Unit

  • 401 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2005

Posted August 28 2005 - 08:08 AM

As Good As It Gets originally did recieve an R rating, according to James L. Brooks on the commentary. They appealed for a PG-13 and got it.
I don't care for modern films. All crashing cars and close-ups of people's feet.
-Lillian Gish

#11 of 108 OFFLINE   Kevin Grey

Kevin Grey


  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: May 20 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 08:48 AM

Eh, I think "The Godfather" had enough graphic violence in it to definitely still warrant an 'R'. Hell, the horse's head scene alone is probably enough.

#12 of 108 OFFLINE   WillG



  • 5,275 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 10:51 AM

Well, you might be right, but I still say the violence is rather tame even compared to stuff that makes it onto network television in many cases.
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#13 of 108 OFFLINE   James T

James T


  • 1,643 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 08 1999

Posted August 28 2005 - 11:08 AM

Highlander 3 is PG-13, but there's plenty of scenes that would have made it R. For example, there's the beheadings, but also a scene where the bad guy hooks up with a hooker, and also when Christopher Lambert gets it on with Debroah Unger with plenty of nudity. Army of Darkness would have to get my vote for movie that doesn't deserve an R rating.

#14 of 108 OFFLINE   WillG



  • 5,275 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted August 28 2005 - 12:31 PM

"Parenthood" is another one that just came to mind. There was some very frank sexuality discussions. A few thinly veiled allusions to oral sex. A Dildo used as a comic setpiece. Discussions and near visualizations of pornography and even drug references. It did really push the limits of PG-13.
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#15 of 108 OFFLINE   JeremySt



  • 1,777 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 19 2001

Posted August 28 2005 - 01:10 PM

edit... somebody beat me to it!

#16 of 108 OFFLINE   Ray H

Ray H


  • 3,481 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2002
  • Real Name:Ray
  • LocationNJ

Posted August 28 2005 - 03:05 PM

Doesn't "My Best Friend's Wedding" also get away with this? Also, I don't think The Frighteners deserved its R rating.
"Here's looking at you, kid."


#17 of 108 OFFLINE   JohnRice


    Lead Actor

  • 8,686 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2000
  • Real Name:John

Posted August 28 2005 - 03:12 PM

"Clever" comments like that are getting so old. While I'm at it Cory, your sig is... 1) In clear violation of HTF rules (size) 2) Spelled wrong. If I was going to make something that big, I'd make sure my spelling was right Red Dawn seemed to be pushing it for PG-13, but maybe they were testing out the rating. I always thought The Ring was pretty intense for a PG-13.

The Hybrid System

The Music Part: Emotiva XSP-1, Thiel CS 3.6, Emotiva XPA-2, Marantz SA8004, Emotiva ERC-3, SVS PB-12 Plus 2

The Surround Part: Sherbourn PT-7030, Thiel SCS3, Emotiva XPA-5, Polk & Emotiva Surrounds.

#18 of 108 OFFLINE   Ryan L. Bisasky

Ryan L. Bisasky

    Second Unit

  • 398 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 07 2005

Posted August 28 2005 - 03:57 PM

I thought the movie "meet the fockers" also really pushed the pg-13 rating also with some frank dialogue
Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of...

#19 of 108 OFFLINE   Grant H

Grant H


  • 2,844 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 24 2002

Posted August 29 2005 - 04:40 AM

The video release of Highlander 3 is R-rated. The theatrical release was supposedly tamer (I did not see it in theaters.)
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!

#20 of 108 OFFLINE   Paul McElligott

Paul McElligott


  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 2002

Posted August 29 2005 - 04:52 AM

If Roger Ebert were posting here, he would probably advise you against trying to see any logic in MPAA ratings. Down that road lies madness.

The R for Lost in Translation was especially baffling. Posted Image
R.I.P. DVDSpot

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users