Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

another help with new receiver pick !!!


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
12 replies to this topic

#1 of 13 Joe*H

Joe*H

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 51 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 25 2004

Posted August 23 2005 - 05:44 PM

Guys I just can't decide between the following models, I have searched this entire board and for pros and cons about each, please someone help me decide between the following;

yamaha rx-v757
onkyo 702 refurb
harman kardon 430 refurb, maybe a 630
pioneer 1015

these are the units that are in my price range with the 630 pushing it to the limit only if its just blows the others away by a long shot, I have klipsch sf-3 front, sf-1 rears, mk v-1b sub and a def tech c-1 center, I am currently useing a yamaha 5740. I'm looking for something that will fill up my 15'x15' living room for movies and that will also rock when I play music. I have gone to the stores and listened to the receivers but I just can't decide someone please help.

#2 of 13 Arthur S

Arthur S

    Screenwriter

  • 2,572 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 1999

Posted August 24 2005 - 08:57 AM

Pioneer 1015 for $450 from Best Buy.

#3 of 13 John S

John S

    Producer

  • 5,460 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2003

Posted August 24 2005 - 09:20 AM

Yamaha 5890 under $500 from various sources as well. Of AVR's in this price range, I feel it has the most power.

#4 of 13 Rory Buszka

Rory Buszka

    Supporting Actor

  • 784 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2002

Posted August 24 2005 - 09:57 AM

However, they trumpet that power rating of 980 watts, but that rating comes from the number measured at 1kHz, and 0.7% THD, multiplied by 7. And Yamaha does not specify how they rate their receivers' power. The FTC says that in order for a reciever company to put out a specification that is labeled "All Channels Driven", all 7 channels need to be driven, but only one channel needs to be driven to its full rated output power. The rest of the channels can simply loaf along at 1/8 of that power. Harman/Kardon, on the other hand, builds much more robust receivers that can deliver their full rated output on all channels, simultaneously. When I worked at Fry's, that was something the H/K guys always told me to make a big deal of, and when it comes down to getting the performance you pay for, it is a big deal.
"It sounds like it's barfing out the bass." - Zach

#5 of 13 John S

John S

    Producer

  • 5,460 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2003

Posted August 24 2005 - 10:01 AM

I'm not going by the numbers on that one.

I am going from experiences with it in large difficult rooms. Seems to have some real muscle to it is all.

Holds reference levels better than say a Pioneer 1014/1015 in my experience is all and the pre/pro section is really robust.

#6 of 13 Rory Buszka

Rory Buszka

    Supporting Actor

  • 784 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2002

Posted August 24 2005 - 10:24 AM

Yeah. When I was at Fry's, a couple weeks before I left, the subwoofer switcher in one of the demo rooms crapped out, but when I told the AVR 435 that we were using that there was no subwoofer connected, it did a scary impression of a subwoofer from a set of JBL E80 mains. You should see those little 6" cones bounce! That's what has always sold me on H/K gear.

Oh, the rooms were all open at the back, so no pressurization and little to no 'room gain', either.
"It sounds like it's barfing out the bass." - Zach

#7 of 13 DavidCooper

DavidCooper

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 230 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 2004

Posted August 24 2005 - 10:45 AM

I would say take a look at the HK 435 as well. Very nice unit with a very nice EQ feature.

#8 of 13 Wayne Ernst

Wayne Ernst

    Screenwriter

  • 2,589 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2002

Posted August 24 2005 - 12:56 PM

You could also pick up the Panasonic XR55 and have a few hundred left over for some music or videos.
"My reality check ... just bounced"

#9 of 13 Rory Buszka

Rory Buszka

    Supporting Actor

  • 784 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2002

Posted August 24 2005 - 01:41 PM

While the Panasonic XR recievers are an interesting option in their price class, they won't even touch a good H/K. I think that our poster was looking for something in the range of quality of the H/K product.
"It sounds like it's barfing out the bass." - Zach

#10 of 13 Paul Mor

Paul Mor

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 82 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2004

Posted August 24 2005 - 03:02 PM

I got an H/K about a year and a half ago and have been very pleased. I had a Yamaha (I believe the model you mentioned) and while I did like it, I don't think it's as good as a comparably priced H/K. Before the Yamaha I had an Onkyo that I really liked, but again I like the H/K better. I will mention also, I think the Yamaha has more bells and whistles (DSP fields, etc), but not as much power.

#11 of 13 Joe*H

Joe*H

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 51 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 25 2004

Posted August 24 2005 - 06:24 PM

I not realy a bells and whistles guy, I dont mess with the delay's or the dsp fields. It sound like to me that the hk may be the one to go with being that everyone says it has the most power. Does the hk 430/630 have the eq feature stated above or is that just on the 435. thanks

#12 of 13 Victor Ferguson

Victor Ferguson

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 120 posts
  • Join Date: May 02 2005

Posted August 25 2005 - 08:29 AM

My vote is for the HK

#13 of 13 John S

John S

    Producer

  • 5,460 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2003

Posted August 25 2005 - 09:39 AM

My vote is also for the H/K 630.... Posted Image