Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Did anyone see Katie Holmes on Letterman last night?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
102 replies to this topic

#21 of 103 OFFLINE   Jason Walstrom

Jason Walstrom

    Supporting Actor



  • 808 posts
  • Join Date: May 06 2003

Posted June 12 2005 - 04:28 AM

I do find it strange being that both movies look pretty good I have no idea why they'd need a publicity stunt like this. I don't think it's a stunt I just think the Press is doing what they do best, Hitting everyone over the head with a hammer pounding away till we are fast food flavored news consumers to the nth degree. I got nuthin'
Nowhere In Mulberry~The Weekly Podcast Commentary of Film, Television and Pop Culture! iTunes

#22 of 103 OFFLINE   John_Lee

John_Lee

    Supporting Actor



  • 966 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2000

Posted June 12 2005 - 02:55 PM

Quote:
I don't think it's a publicity stunt. Why even bother? Neither movie is gonna need any help.
Three words, The Last Samurai.

#23 of 103 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 22,312 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted June 12 2005 - 03:41 PM

The Last Samurai didn't have 'splosions, aliens, cool effects and SpeilbergPosted Image

#24 of 103 OFFLINE   Scott Hanson

Scott Hanson

    Screenwriter



  • 2,901 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 02 2001
  • Real Name:Scott

Posted June 12 2005 - 04:55 PM

I don't know what's more disturbing - this whole Holmes/Cruise thing...the fact that this thread got 22 replies so far (er, 23)...or the fact that I read every single one of them.

#25 of 103 OFFLINE   John Mansor

John Mansor

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 217 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 09 2003

Posted June 13 2005 - 01:07 AM

When does everyone think this relationship will end? Right after WotW is released? Or maybe a two month buffer? I can't see it lasting until 2006.

#26 of 103 OFFLINE   MikeM

MikeM

    Screenwriter



  • 1,207 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 23 1999

Posted June 13 2005 - 01:14 AM

The over/under is 6 months.

I'll take $50 on the under.

#27 of 103 OFFLINE   Clint B

Clint B

    Second Unit



  • 319 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 14 2001

Posted June 13 2005 - 12:34 PM

Supposedly, Katie's now converting to Scientology. I hope she's doing that because she really wants to, but one does wonder.

By the way, I'll take the under.

#28 of 103 OFFLINE   MikeM

MikeM

    Screenwriter



  • 1,207 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 23 1999

Posted June 13 2005 - 09:29 PM

If she coverts, then the over is a LOCK.

#29 of 103 OFFLINE   SarahG

SarahG

    Second Unit



  • 494 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 06 2003

Posted June 15 2005 - 06:23 AM

I'm anxious to see how this one turns out.
Fish are Friends, not Food!

#30 of 103 OFFLINE   Micheal

Micheal

    Screenwriter



  • 1,526 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 13 1999

Posted June 15 2005 - 07:48 AM

Quote:
and with Tom Cruise now hitting 40, I think he is pushing harder to stay on top.
42 and counting last time I heard.
BLAM!
Good... bad... I'm the guy with the gun.

#31 of 103 OFFLINE   Greg S

Greg S

    Supporting Actor



  • 991 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 13 2000

Posted June 15 2005 - 08:28 AM

Its going to "officially" go til 2006 BUT they won't attend the same New Years Eve Party which will essentially mark the beginning of the end for this "relationship", ie the tabloids will headline "Could it be over ... Tom and Katie are not together on New Years Eve!!"

BTW am I the only one who is having a hard time seeing Katie Holmes as anything but a young highschooler?? She doesn't seem like the right person to play older rolls than that -- I guess its just my brain in the way.

Greg

#32 of 103 OFFLINE   Thi Them

Thi Them

    Producer



  • 3,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 20 1999

Posted June 17 2005 - 04:02 AM

They are getting married. Yep, a big publicity stunt...

~T

#33 of 103 OFFLINE   Holadem

Holadem

    Lead Actor



  • 8,972 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted June 17 2005 - 04:11 AM

It's absurd to think that people would date in such a fashion as a publicity stunt.

Leaking rumors of dating and cryptically answering related inquiries? Yes.

Actually showing up on talk shows and proclaiming their love to the world just to sell a movie which needs no selling?

Come on... these people are well... people you know? Not everything they do must have some kind of ulterior motive.

--
H

#34 of 103 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer



  • 11,676 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • LocationVermont

Posted June 17 2005 - 04:21 AM

They are getting married. Yep, a big publicity stunt...

It works for J.Lo. on a regular basis.
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#35 of 103 OFFLINE   EricW

EricW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted June 17 2005 - 06:04 AM

it's hard to respect a star's right to privacy when they're so open about it. i mean Cruise proposes on the Eiffel Tower and the next day he delcares it to the world via a publicist or interview or something. then he talks about how tough it is being in the spotlight.

(having said that, there's no way this coupling is a publicity stunt i think)

i would much more respect the privacy of a reculsive star that likes to keep his personal life private (basically the other 99% of actors) like a Johnny Depp or Sean Penn or even Brad Pitt.
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#36 of 103 OFFLINE   Thi Them

Thi Them

    Producer



  • 3,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 20 1999

Posted June 17 2005 - 06:06 AM

I think Cruise is one of the few celebrities that accepts the spotlight and never complains about it.

~T

#37 of 103 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer



  • 5,227 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted June 17 2005 - 06:35 AM

Interesting Blind item from Page Six of today's NY Post

Quote:
WHICH top leading man interviewed three different starlets for the job of girlfriend/future wife before picking his new beloved? "Mark my words: They'll have a baby," said our source. "Maybe he or she will be conceived in a petri dish, but they'll procreate" .


I'm drawing a pretty big blank on who else this could be in reference to.
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#38 of 103 OFFLINE   John_Lee

John_Lee

    Supporting Actor



  • 966 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2000

Posted June 17 2005 - 10:47 AM

Interesting Blind item from Page Six of today's NY Post

If we're building on rampant speculation, I saw somewhere [actually a political site reporting this little nugget, so I won't go into where] that Tom had put the hard press on Jennifer Garner to be his arm candy before settling on Katie. Said Jennifer had to tell him firmly that she was sticking with Ben and to leave her alone and stop sending gifts.

#39 of 103 OFFLINE   Elizabeth S

Elizabeth S

    Producer



  • 4,467 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2001

Posted June 17 2005 - 11:07 AM

And another was supposedly Jessica Alba.

#40 of 103 OFFLINE   David_Blackwell

David_Blackwell

    Screenwriter



  • 1,435 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2004

Posted June 18 2005 - 03:36 PM

And I hear Katie is taking a year off from acting to be with Tom.
ENTERLINE MEDIA (entertainment articles and DVD/Movie/TV show reviews)





Forum Nav Content I Follow