Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Decibel question


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 of 10 OFFLINE   Troy Swanson

Troy Swanson

    Extra



  • 18 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 2004

Posted May 16 2005 - 03:30 PM

I know decibels are a measure of a speakers effciency. Higher the number, less power required to achieve a desired SPL. When and how much makes a difference. I have a pair of Wharfedale diamond 8.1 bookshelves rated at 86 dB at 1 meter. I am looking at replacing them with a pair of Klipsch B-2s rated at 92 dB at 1 meter. How significant is 6 decibels from 86 to 92?

#2 of 10 OFFLINE   Wayne A. Pflughaupt

Wayne A. Pflughaupt

    Producer



  • 5,955 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 05 1999
  • Real Name:Wayne
  • LocationKaty, TX

Posted May 16 2005 - 04:50 PM

It’s roughly the equivalent of tripling your amplifier power. Regards, Wayne A. Pflughaupt
My Equipment List
“A nice mid-fi system,” according to an audiophile acquaintance.

My Tech / DIY Articles and Reviews

#3 of 10 OFFLINE   FeisalK

FeisalK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,245 posts
  • Join Date: May 01 2003

Posted May 16 2005 - 08:00 PM

Wayne, wouldn't it be like quadrupling?
>
DVD-A registry for hirez/surround audio
Bluray, DVD-Audio, DAD/HDAD, DualDisc, MVI

#4 of 10 OFFLINE   Chris Quinn

Chris Quinn

    Screenwriter



  • 1,127 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 2003

Posted May 17 2005 - 02:19 AM

Yes, it would take quadrupling the power. Every 3dB increase requires twice the watts.

#5 of 10 OFFLINE   Mark Seaton

Mark Seaton

    Supporting Actor



  • 600 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 10 1999

Posted May 17 2005 - 03:00 AM


While many mislabel sensitivity as efficiency. Efficiency is a clearly defined concept in most any science, commonly noted the percentage of input power which is converted to work. Efficiency should be listed as a percentage. Specifications for raw drivers sometimes list no(%) which is in fact the efficiency of the driver as calculated from its Thiel-Small parameters.

Sensitivity is a measure of output as a result of some input, or the input required to produce some output. Loudspeakers are commonly measured for senstivity as it relates to SPL produced at 1m from a 1W of input power. 1W into an 8 Ohm resistive load requires 2.83V across the driver. Real loudspeakers are not resistive loads. All loudspeakers are of course not 8 Ohms either. Many companies will list sensitivity without a referenced drive voltage for a 4 Ohm loudspeaker. This gives the 4 Ohm speaker an apparent 3dB gain in sensitivity.

Our amplifiers work by providing and maintaining a drive voltage and whatever current the loudspeaker demands until either the voltage or current limits of the amplifier are reached. Using the "nominal" 2.83V drive voltage gives us a reference for what we will hear when we sit two speakers side by side, and connect one, then the other; without changing the drive level (volume setting). In reality, the 4 Ohm nominal loudspeaker will be making the amplifier work harder with the same volume setting. In real use we have to look at how our amplifier performs at lower impedances to see how much of the improved sensitivity we can put to use. Some amplifiers will almost double their power into 4 Ohms relative to 8 Ohms. Some will be almost the same.

If you want to consider maximum calculated clean capabilties from a loudspeaker and amplifier based on its rated power into the nominal load of your loudspeaker, you need a more appropriate 1W sensitivity for your loudspeaker. 2.0V into a 4 Ohm load allows you to directly calculate from the 4 Ohm power rating of your amplifier. If you are given a 2.8V sensitivity for a 4 Ohm loudspeaker, you need to subtract 3dB to put this in proper perspective with the available power into 4 Ohms from your amplifier, or calculate for 1/2 the 4 Ohm power rating. Of course calculating this maximum output ignores whether or not your speaker will go up in smoke or be heavily distorting at this level. Those are separate, but equally important matters.

For those curious where the rule-of-thumb 3dB per doubling comes from, here's the equation for relative power increase:
relative change in dB = 10 * log(P/P-i)

Where P is the new power or rated power, and P-i is the initial power or can be 1W if that is your reference.

When looking at Voltage The equation changes to:
relative change in dB = 20 * log(V/Vi)

Hope that helps,
Mark Seaton
Seaton Sound, Inc.

#6 of 10 OFFLINE   Troy Swanson

Troy Swanson

    Extra



  • 18 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 2004

Posted May 18 2005 - 02:39 AM

Mark, I am still confused a little. her is my example Speaker set 1: 86 dB@ 2.83v/1 meter 6 ohms Speaker set 2: 92 dB@ 2.83v/1 meter 8 ohms Which would be more efficient, or do you need my Receiver specs to complete the story?

#7 of 10 OFFLINE   Jeremiah Dant

Jeremiah Dant

    Agent



  • 32 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 2005

Posted May 18 2005 - 03:28 AM

the one at 92db@ 1 watt would be more efficient. the speaker at 86 db@ 1 watt would require 4 times times the amount of power to reach the same volume as the 92db@1 watt. every 3 db requires double the power. here is another way to look at it. speaker 1 86 db = 1watt 89 db =2 watts 92 db = 4 watts speaker 2 92db= 1 watt
Klipsch rule. (Of course that my opinion, and you know what they say about them.) SEE MY SETUP

#8 of 10 OFFLINE   Greg Bright

Greg Bright

    Second Unit



  • 263 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000

Posted May 19 2005 - 12:43 PM

Troy, What this means, all (and I mean all) other things being equal, is that the Klipsch speakers will play louder and cleaner than the Wharfdales using the same amount of amplifier power. And that's what we all want. Right? Obvious answer: not necessarily.
"Aufersteh'n, ja aufersteh'n wirst du, Mein Herz, in einem Nu.
Was du geschlagen, Zu Gott wird es dich tragen!"

#9 of 10 OFFLINE   Troy Swanson

Troy Swanson

    Extra



  • 18 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 2004

Posted May 19 2005 - 02:22 PM

Thank you for the replies, I figured this was the case, it seems as though Klipsch has very high dB ratings, typically 4-6 dB higher. I have been comparing Monitor Audio, Boston acoustics, Polk, etc. and they all have a lower dB rating than Klipsch. I wanted to make sure before I purchase another pair of speakers.

#10 of 10 OFFLINE   Jeremiah Dant

Jeremiah Dant

    Agent



  • 32 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 2005

Posted May 19 2005 - 09:48 PM

that is what klipsch is know for. is playing loud and clean with lower power amp than most other speakers. On my system i can not even get my klipsch above half way on the knob before my ears feel like they are going to explode. I have a 100 watt per channel amp and klipsch KLF-20's with a rating of 100db @ 1 Watt @ 1 meter. Mine require almost 8 times less power then the other klipsch speakers you were talking about at 92db
Klipsch rule. (Of course that my opinion, and you know what they say about them.) SEE MY SETUP




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users