Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Alice's Adventures in Wonderland - Which Version?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 of 5 OFFLINE   Fredric


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 71 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 08 2003

Posted May 11 2005 - 07:22 AM

There are a handful of public domain versions of this 1972 classic, starring Fiona Fullerton and an all-star British cast. Which one is the best one? Apparently all suffer in quality, but some are pan and scan, and some are scope. Which is the one to get?

The Frankenheimer Group

#2 of 5 OFFLINE   Anthony Neilson

Anthony Neilson


  • 1,020 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 2003
  • Real Name:Anthony
  • LocationLondon

Posted May 11 2005 - 09:15 AM

I know of two in R1 but both are pan and scan and absolutely horrible. The only one in OAR, as far as I know, is the recently released R2 edition, though it's a far from perfect transfer. Are you multi-region enabled ?
I've been going to bed early . . .

#3 of 5 OFFLINE   Radioman970



  • 5,904 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2006
  • Real Name:James Perry
  • LocationCould be anywhere

Posted August 02 2006 - 01:56 AM

I'm a huge fan of the film. I recommend this version at this point...


It's still p&s but the color is much better. The sound is awful. The levels are fine but it sounds as if it is warped especially during the musical moments.

I've heard the new R2 widescreen version is the best overall. If the R1 version of that one doesn't get here I'll buy the R2 and see for myself.
Silly Party Candidate: Tarquin Fin- tim- lim- bim- whin- bim- lim- bus- stop- F'tang- F'tang- Olè- Biscuitbarrel

#4 of 5 OFFLINE   Larry House

Larry House

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 127 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2003

Posted August 03 2006 - 01:49 AM

Does anyone know how this 1972 production became public domain? Seems odd for something so recent.

#5 of 5 OFFLINE   John Whittle

John Whittle

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 185 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 22 2004

Posted August 03 2006 - 04:21 AM

Originally Posted by Larry House
Does anyone know how this 1972 production became public domain? Seems odd for something so recent.
It probably isn't public domain, rather it's probably an orphan. The production company made three films listed in imdb in 1971-72. It probably went "out of business" and the rights to the films is in receivership. Since negatives carry tremendous entanglements as to re-run, residual, music, etc. the current owner may not be interested in preparing it for a commercial release and may not have the funds or desire to go after any company that does.

That's only a guess, but that's why people have to hire lawyers and and copyright research to clear a title before going into distribution.

I've worked on films that I doubt will ever show up since they're encumbered in legal liens, music rights clearances or various unpaid bills and payrolls which all would have to be settled before the film could be released to any venue.