Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Quantum Leap S3 - music changed!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#21 of 45 OFFLINE   Carlo S

Carlo S

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 111 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 14 2000

Posted May 08 2005 - 11:51 PM

Well after my problems I have had with the Knight Rider S2 box sets, I have been put off buying any further releases from Universal (well the R1 releases anyway that is). If anyone does get it do tell the condition of the DVDs. I Would really like to know.

#22 of 45 OFFLINE   Edward Schatz

Edward Schatz

    Second Unit



  • 415 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2003

Posted May 11 2005 - 11:49 AM

I enjoy how Universal placed "Music may differ from televised version" or something to that effect in small print on the back at the bottom. Only someone who cares would notice, which I guess is the right decision on Universal's part to sell it. If it had "MUSIC REPLACED" smacked on the front their sales would decrease. Regardless, I will not be buying this. Bah.
Edward

#23 of 45 OFFLINE   Gord Lacey

Gord Lacey

    Screenwriter



  • 2,447 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2001

Posted May 11 2005 - 03:26 PM

Edward, most companies are handling the "music replaced" situation with small disclaimers. I think the Married...With Children season 3 disclaimer was a lot bigger than normal. Gord
Want to see your favorite show on DVD?

#24 of 45 OFFLINE   Greg_S_H

Greg_S_H

    Executive Producer



  • 15,117 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2001
  • Real Name:Greg
  • LocationNorth Texas

Posted May 11 2005 - 03:37 PM

More from Al's Place:


Posted Image

#25 of 45 OFFLINE   Paul Sandhu

Paul Sandhu

    Supporting Actor



  • 528 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 21 2003

Posted May 11 2005 - 06:19 PM

I know it sucks that the music has been replaced.... but for me its better than nothing.

#26 of 45 OFFLINE   Edward Schatz

Edward Schatz

    Second Unit



  • 415 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2003

Posted May 11 2005 - 06:27 PM

I respectfully disagree. While it may be "better than nothing," buying it supports the practice in my opinion. You can spin it any way you want, not buying it gives them the sense people don't want it, therefore don't put out more, etc. I just won't give them my money for a half product.
Edward

#27 of 45 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader

    Screenwriter



  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted May 11 2005 - 09:25 PM

But what would happen if Universal did pay the money for the offending music? The price of the set would go up, and would most likely result in fewer sales. Perhaps all of the seasons wouldn't be released as a result. Meanwhile, having their (possibly - we can't really say as we don't know the full facts) outrageous demands for fees met by a major Hollywood studio, music rights owners would have no incentive to lower their asking price for future TV on DVD releases. In fact, their incentive would be to ask for more money next time. This the price of season sets would most likely go up again as a result. We do know that the rights owners of the Married with Children theme (Love and Marriage) were asking outrageous money to licence the music to Sony. After Sony paid the money for the first two seasons, they obviously thought they could get away with asking more for subsequent series. Especially as the music was "essential" - being the theme song. I'm glad Sony refused to pay. While I often see people claiming greed by the studios is the reason, I never see people claiming greed by the music holders. Submiting to music holder's greed will only result in an upward spiral of costs. Always look at the bigger picture.
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

#28 of 45 OFFLINE   Christian Preischl

Christian Preischl

    Screenwriter



  • 1,376 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2001

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:03 AM

The picture I'm seeing is that they even reduced the SRP by 10 bucks for season 3! I wonder how much music 10 bucks per set could have saved. Chris

#29 of 45 OFFLINE   Randy_Cre

Randy_Cre

    Agent



  • 46 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2004

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:07 AM

I keep hearing maybe they won't release the rest of the shows... I understand the logic for the "better than nothing" people. As someone who isn't buying these altered sets.... I frankly don't care if it means Universal doesn't release the rest of the series... If Universal does release the rest of the series, I wouldn't want the remaining seasons either because its pretty much guaranteed that Universal is going to be issuing more of the "better than nothing" altered sets. I'm a huge fan of QL, so the show was on my must buy list.... But I'm not going to spend money on sets that are going to piss me off every time it plays a scene with Muzak inserted into it. So if not buying these ruined sets means that Universal won't release more ruined sets... that's no great loss in my opinion. Conversely, supporting these releases pretty much ensures Universal (and maybe others) will continue the practice of replacing music (almost excessively as Universal has done replacing almost every thing not sung by a character). I really don't care who bears the majority of the blame, the studios or the rights holders. But they need to work it out if they want MY money. However, Universal's handling of Quantum Leap does not seem to have anything similiar to the Married with Children issue, where ONE song had issues because of an outrageous demand. QL's changes are widespred throughout the sets, so I can see why many are faulting Universal in this case rather than the positive attitude many had towards Columbia in the MWC situation.

#30 of 45 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader

    Screenwriter



  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:29 AM

Yes, but Christian have you asked why the RRP has been reduced by $10? Studios generally do do research on potential sales vs cost issues. Retail prices are not plucked out of a hat, they are carefully considered on a sales/financial return basis. Remember members of this forum have sometimes reported on being involved in such surveys, which contain everything from packaging preferences to prices. If Universal feel the need to drop the price of Quantum Leap S3, it could just as easily be because they hope it will improve sales rather then be bacause S2 had too many sales. As for Universal and music replacements, I don't think it is fair to single them out - especially when comparing it to Columbia and MWC. After all, Columbia also release Tour of Duty do they not? All of the studios releasing archive (and sometimes not so archived) TV content on DVD have resorted to subsituting music at some point or another. I also understand that the replaced music on QL S3 is way down on the number of subsitutions on S2.
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

#31 of 45 OFFLINE   Edward Schatz

Edward Schatz

    Second Unit



  • 415 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2003

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:50 AM

I would gladly let them take my money for the appropriate music. People did, after all, pay 100+ USD for Star Trek: TNG seasons and that had no music to license. $35 is nice, but I don't really care since I won't be buying it anyway.
Edward

#32 of 45 OFFLINE   Randy_Cre

Randy_Cre

    Agent



  • 46 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2004

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:54 AM

If I understand correctly, the rights holders increased their demands after agreeing to a different cost for the first two seasons. I could be wrong but my understanding of the MWC theme issue was that the studio balked at a higher demand when they opened discussions for season 3. (I wouldn't find this surprising, as I'm sure studios are reluctant to agree to a price for an entire series when so many shows never get beyond the 1st or 2nd season release.) I'm sure that other studios are doing the same, Universal being largely singled out because this is a QL thread. (Though Universal also removed Northern Exposure from my buy list by replacing music in that also, and I fear will follow the same pattern with Miami Vice.) Personally, I'm not lowering my expectations when it comes spending MY money. If QL sets are without substitution, like S1, then I'll buy those sets. Same goes for Northern Exposure. But music replacements = no sale for me (MWC included even if it is 'just' the theme song). ... I'd rather support 'un-authorized' versions intact, than 'authorized' versions that are butchered.

#33 of 45 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader

    Screenwriter



  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted May 12 2005 - 02:54 AM

Yes. But if rights holders see that the demand exists, what do you think that are going to do, en mass? They're all going to assume that they have studios over a barrel and demand more money (just like they did with Love and Marriage). Not all of the greed is coming from the studios. Giving in to outrageous demands now will only encourage more in the future.
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

#34 of 45 OFFLINE   Christian Preischl

Christian Preischl

    Screenwriter



  • 1,376 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2001

Posted May 12 2005 - 04:00 AM

Agreed. Music probably didn't have anything to do with it. As has been mentioned in another thread, season 2 releases of any show generally sell in significantly lower numbers than the first season. Third seasons are even worse. I guess that's why they dropped the price. They did the same with Magnum and Columbo (the latter was reduced by a whopping 20 bucks), even though those two shows don't have any music replaced... yet. There's three things that keep bothering me. Two in regards to QL especially, and one with music replacements in general. 1) With Quantum Leap you can't disregard the fact that Universal themselves admitted that a main reason (not the only one, mind you) for the music changes on season 2 were because they were surprised by the strong sales of season 1 (proving that people were willing to accept an SRP of 60$ for half a season!) and wanted to get the next season out as fast as possible. The fact that season 3's music suffers the same fate only tells me that sales were good enough for them to continue the way they did. And I'm sure the lower SRP will help, too. 2) There's the fact that the music changes on season 3 still exhibit the same lack of care as the previous one, namely replacing well known songs with crappy stock music probably taken out of Universal's own library. At least with the changes on other shows like Roswell and Married with Children and Dawson's Creek (up until season 5 when they started cutting) some care was taken when choosing the replacements. 3) Finally, I still don't understand how Warner can release almost all of their shows without any music changes (exceptions do apply of course), at similar prices. I know each show, heck each single episode of each show, is a different animal and you can't really compare e.g. Smallville to Northern Exposure (the number of sold items being the main difference)... but I still can't help but wonder. Chris

#35 of 45 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader

    Screenwriter



  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted May 12 2005 - 04:20 AM

Well Warner is also a music publisher itself (Universal isn't anymore), and most modern Warner shows are used to promote their musical properites. While this doesn't mean that there is no conflict of rights, potential conflict is obviously reduced. I can't really say anything about some of the archive Warner releases (but it appears Murphy Brown has most, if not all, of the Motown music intact. However, I note that there are currently no plans for more Murphy Brown releases - could the sales not have been high enough to justify the music licencing?) but its unfair to compare a modern show like Smallville to Northern Exposure. At the very least, Warner would have secured the music rights for internationsl home video sales on Smallville when the series was being filmed.
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

#36 of 45 OFFLINE   john mcfadden

john mcfadden

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 240 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 11 2003

Posted May 12 2005 - 03:58 PM

Sorry , but its been so long since ive seen alot of episodes the substitutions dont bother me , except for the loss of Georgia on my mind in season 2 , because that song is played at the end of the last episode . I remember crying at the end of the show , and that song is what did it .So i understand where everybody is on the not buying issue. I buy the sets for Sam and Al , the music does set the tone , but i can let it go for having the show in my collection . Hopefully that QL tv movie might happen sometime soon , with Scott Bacula being available .

#37 of 45 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,701 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted May 12 2005 - 08:14 PM

I didn't, and I quite frankly can't afford them at that price. Neither can my brother. That's two people that would have bought 17+ seasons of Star Trek that didn't.

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#38 of 45 OFFLINE   george kaplan

george kaplan

    Executive Producer



  • 13,064 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted May 13 2005 - 12:38 AM

Well I know a number of people who did buy (at least TNG) at that price, and certainly would not have if the episodes had been cut or censored, even if the price were much, much less.
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder

"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.

"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...

#39 of 45 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,701 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted May 13 2005 - 06:56 AM

I also would not buy cut or censored products. I don't consider music replacement to be the same thing. It's in its own catagory, and to me is not something that outright disqualifies a release. If Star Trek was priced at $50 a season and had music replaced, I'd still buy it. It would be different if it was one studio changing music while all the others got the original music for all their releases, but this is not the case. Every studio has had to replace music on TV product at some point. I've accepted it as a necessary evil for TV on DVD products. Like was said previously by another user, the enjoyment I get out of Quantum Leap and the two main characters overshadows any issue I have with music replacement. I know for some it is hard to enjoy a product they know has been altered, and I empathize, but I don't think it's a poor reflection on me that I can enjoy these products despite the restrictions due to music replacement.

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#40 of 45 OFFLINE   Paul Sandhu

Paul Sandhu

    Supporting Actor



  • 528 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 21 2003

Posted June 08 2005 - 08:28 PM

I am also enjoying this QL season. I just started the second disc. I forgot how good this show was.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users